Colorectal cancer emerges as one of the leading public health issues in Indonesia, which currently ranked third as the most common cancer with a 10 % mortality rate. The aberrant activation of Hedgehog signalling pathway is one of the mechanisms that can happen during colorectal cancer formation, which involving Smoothened (Smo) protein, a G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) that plays an imperative role when this signalling pathway is mutated, leading into the massive growth of cancer stem cells. In this research, the Smo protein was employed against 41,399 flavonoid ligands through pharmacophore-based virtual screening and molecular docking simulation in order to find the most potential flavonoid compound as Smo protein inhibitor. All flavonoid compounds were subjected to computational toxicity and druglikeness predictions before they underwent screening and docking simulations. The result showed that the pharmacophore feature of Smo binding site was contained of three pharmacophore points; one H-donor feature, one H-acceptor feature, and one-aromatic feature, according to the vismodegib binding mode. In the end, about six flavonoid ligands were chosen as the best flavonoid compounds due to their molecular interactions and binding affinities in the binding site of Smo protein, with 3-methyl-4-oxo-2-phenyl-N-(tetrahydro-2-furanylmethyl)-4H-chromene-8-carboxamide, a modified-flavone compound, was chosen as the best flavonoid ligand to inhibit Smo protein by having ΔGbinding and RMSD values of −10.6934 kcal/mol and 0.9838 Å, respectively.

1.
R. L.
Siegel
 et al.,
CA Cancer J. Clin.
67
,
177
193
(
2017
).
2.
3.
J.
Bogaert
and
H.
Prenen
,
Ann. Gastroenterol.
27
,
9
14
(
2014
).
4.
M.
Abdullah
,
A. W.
Sudoyo
,
A. R.
,
Utomo
,
A.
Fauzi
and
A. A.
Rani
,
Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed. Bench.
5
,
71
78
(
2012
).
5.
S.
Widjaja
and
H.
Yo
,
Ann. Oncol.
27
,
86
101
(
2016
).
6.
E. R.
Fearon
and
B. A.
Vogelstein
,
Cell
61
,
759
767
(
1990
).
7.
B.
Leggett
and
V.
Whitehall
,
Gastroenterology
138
,
2088
2100
(
2010
).
8.
K. W.
Jasperson
,
T. M.
Tuohy
,
D. W.
Neklason
and
R. W.
Burt
,
Gastroenterology
138
,
2044
2058
(
2010
).
9.
D.
Smith
 et al.,
Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl.
88
,
185
190
(
2006
).
10.
J. H.
Rubenstein
 et al.,
Gastroenterology
149
,
777
782
(
2015
).
11.
E.
Petricci
and
F.
Manetti
,
Curr. Med. Chem.
22
,
4058
4090
(
2015
).
12.
P. W.
Ingham
,
Y.
Nakano
and
C.
Seger
,
Nat. Rev. Genet.
12
,
393
406
(
2011
).
13.
P.
Kogerman
 et al.,
Nat. Cell Biol.
1
,
312
319
(
1999
).
14.
S.-Y.
Lee
 et al.,
Oncol. Rep.
17
,
1051
1055
(
2007
).
15.
R. L.
Yauch
 et al.,
Science
326
,
572
574
(
2009
).
16.
A. N.
Panche
,
A. D.
Diwan
and
S. R.
Chandra
,
J. Nutr. Sci.
5
,
e47
(
2016
).
17.
F.
Ghirga
,
M.
Mori
and
P.
Infante
,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
28
,
3131
3140
(
2018
).
18.
S.
Vilar
,
G.
Cozza
and
S.
Moro
,
Curr. Top. Med. Chem.
8
,
1555
1572
(
2008
).
19.
A. A.
Parikesit
,
B.
Ardiansah
,
D. M.
Handayani
,
U. S. F.
Tambunan
and
D.
Kerami
,
IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.
107
,
012053
(
2016
).
20.
R. P.
Putra
,
A. H.
Alkaff
,
M. A. F
Nasution
,
A. C. B.
Kantale
and
U. S. F.
Tambunan
,
Int. J. GEOMATE Spec. Issue Sci. Eng. Environ.
15
,
78
84
(
2018
).
21.
U. S. F.
Tambunan
,
A. A.
Parikesit
,
M. A. F.
Nasution
,
A.
Hapsari
and
D.
Kerami
,
Iran. J. Pharm. Res.
16
,
1115
1129
(
2017
).
22.
M. A. F.
Nasution
,
R. N.
Aini
and
U. S. F.
Tambunan
,
IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng.
188
,
1
10
(
2017
).
23.
P. W.
Rose
 et al.,
Nucleic Acids Res.
45
,
D271
D281
(
2017
).
24.
E. F. X.
Byrne
 et al.,
Nature
535
,
517
522
(
2016
).
25.
T.
Sander
,
J.
Freyss
,
M.
Von Korff
and
C.
Rufener
,
J. Chem. Inf. Model.
55
,
460
473
(
2015
).
26.
U. S. F.
Tambunan
and
M. A. F.
Nasution
,
AIP Conference Proceedings
1862
,
030091
(
2017
).
This content is only available via PDF.