We are developing, the first of its type, a portable active interrogation system for special nuclear materials (SNMs) detection such as U-235 and Pu-239. The system is based on the recently developed technique, threshold energy neutron analysis (TENA) method. Mandatory aspects for the neutron generator to be used for on-site inspection as well as for container screening at ports of entry is intense neutron as 5×107 n/s neutron yield in a very compact configuration such as ∼25 cm diameter, 60 cm height, and lightweight ∼30 kg. The criteria mentioned above are matching the neutron generator based on the D-D fusion reaction from Inertial Electrostatic Confinement (IEC) fusion device. Two prototypes of the DD-IEC fusion device, with 17 cm anode diameter, have been designed, fabricated and tested. The anode of the first device was made from stainless steel, while titanium was chosen to build the second version. The cathode for both versions was made from molybdenum with 6 cm diameter. High voltage and current are required to achieve the target neutron yield from the compact configuration. To cope with that, we used a developed technique called a multistage feedthrough method to enable applying higher voltage and current, up to 120 kV and 300 mA, in a compact configuration. The neutron production rate (NPR) achieved from the 1st prototype was ∼2.8×107 n/s by applying 70 kV and 150 mA, and from the 2nd prototype was 8.9×107 n/s, by applying 75 kV and 70 mA current, which exceeds the target NPR designed for the SNMs interrogation system. The technical developments and challenges to construct and operate the prototypes of the DD-IEC fusion device are discussed together with the experimental results for the NPR measurements.

1.
Y.
Takahashi
,
T.
Misawa
,
T.
Yagi
,
C.H.
Pyeon
,
M.
Kimura
,
K.
Masuda
,
H.
Ohgaki
,
Proceedings of Nuclear Physics and Gamma-ray Sources for Nuclear Security and Nonproliferation
,
Tokai, Japan
, January, pp.
341
346
(
2014
).
2.
R.P.
Taleyarkhan
,
J.
Lapinskas
,
Y.
Xu
,
Nuclear Engineering and Design
, Vol.
238
, pp.
1820
1827
(
2008
).
3.
H.
Ohgaki
,
I.
Daito
,
H.
Zen
,
T.
Kii
,
K.
Masuda
,
T.
Misawa
,
R.
Hajima
,
T.
Hayakawa
,
T.
Shizuma
,
M.
Kando
, and
S.
Fujimoto
, “
Nondestructive Inspection System for Special Nuclear Material Using Inertial Electrostatic Confinement Fusion Neutrons and Laser Compton Scattering Gamma-Rays
”,
IEEE Transaction on Nuclear Science
, Vol.
64
, No.
7
, pp.
1635
1649
, (
2017
).
4.
Lavrent’ev’s
proposed forwarded to the CPSU Central Committee
” on Joly 29. 1950
Physics-Uspekhi
, Vol
44
,
862
, (
2001
).
5.
P.T.
Farnsworth
: “
Electric discharge device for producing interactions between nuclei
”: U.S. Patent 3258402A (
1966
).
6.
R.L.
Hirsch
, “
Inertial-electrostatic confinement of ionized fusion gases
,”
Journal of Applied Physics
, Vol.
38
, No.
11
, pp.
4522
4534
(
1967
).
7.
R.L.
Hirsch
,
Phys Fluids
, ”
Experimental Studies of deep, Negative, Electrostatic Potential Well in Spherical Geometry
,” Vol.
11
, pp.
2486
2490
, (
1968
).
8.
J. H.
Nadler
,
G.H.
Miley
,
Y.B.
Gu
,
T.
Hochberg
, “
Characterization of an inertial-electrostatic confinement glow discharge (IECGD) neutron generator
,”
Fusion Technology
, Vol.
21
, pp.
1639
1643
(
1991
).
9.
G. H.
Miley
,
J.
Nadler
,
T.
Hochberg
,
Y.
Gu
,
O.
Barnouin
,
J.
Lovberg
, “
Inertial Electrostatic Confinement: An Approach to Burning Advanced Fuels
,”
Fusion Science and Tech.
19
, pp.
840
845
, (
1991
).
10.
K.
Yoshikawa
,
K.
Takiyama
,
T.
Koyama
,
K.
Teruya
,
K.
Masuda
,
Y.
Yamamoto
,
T.
Toku
,
T.
Kii
,
H.
Hashimoto
,
N.
Inoue
,
M.
Ohnishi
, and
H.
Horiike
, “
Measurements of strongly localized potential well profiles in an inertial electrostatic fusion neutron source
,”
Nuclear Fusion
, Vol.
41
, No.
6
, pp.
717
720
, (
2001
).
11.
S. Krupakar
Murali
,
B.B.
Cipiti
,
J.F.
Santarius
, and
G.L.
Kulcinski
, “
Study of Fusion Regimes in an Inertial Electrostatic Confinement Device Using the New Eclipse Disk Diagnostic
,”
Physics of Plasmas
13
,
053111
(
2006
).
12.
R.
Bawden-Reid
,
J.
Khachan
,
J.P.
Wulfkuhler
, and
M.
Tajmar
, “
Evidence for surface fusion in inertial electrostatic confinement devices
,”
Physics of Plasmas
25
,
112702
(
2018
).
13.
N.
Buzabaruah
,
S. R.
Mohanty
, and
E.
Hotta
, “
A study on neutron emission from a cylindrical inertial electrostatic confinement device
,”
Nuclear instrument and methods in physics research A
,
911
, pp.
66
73
, (
2018
).
14.
K.
Yoshikawa
,
K.
Masuda
,
H.
Toku
,
K.
Nagasaki
,
T.
Mizutani
,
T.
Takamatsu
,
M.
Imoto
,
Y.
Yamamoto
,
M.
Ohnishi
,
H.
Osawa
,
E.
Hotta
,
T.
Kohno
,
A.
Okino
,
M.
Watanabe
,
K.
Yamauchi
,
M.
Yuura
,
S.
Shiroya
,
T.
Misawa
, and
T.
Mori
, “
Research and Development of Landmine Detection System compact Fusion neutrons source
”,
Fusion Science and Technology
, Vol.
47
, pp.
1224
1228
, May (
2005
).
15.
K.
Masuda
,
Y.
Yamagaki
,
T.
Kajiwara
,
J.
Kipritidis
: “
Numerical study of ion recirculation in an improved spherical inertial electrostatic confinement fusion scheme by use of a multistage high-voltage feedthrough
,”
Fusion Science and Technology
, Vol.
60
, No.
2
, pp.
625
629
(
2011
).
16.
M.
Bakr
,
K.
Masuda
, and
M.
Yoshida
, “
Improvement of the Neutron Production Rate of IEC Fusion Device by the Fusion Reaction on the Chamber Inner Surface
,” submitted to
Journal of Fusion Science and Technology.
This content is only available via PDF.