The Next-CSP project aims at improving the performances of central receiver Solar Thermal Electric (STE) plants through the development and integration of a new technology based on high temperature (800°C) particles used as both heat transfer fluid and storage medium.

The objective of the present paper is to define the best combined cycle configuration by exploring various design options where Turbine Exhaust Temperature (TET) and compressor outlet temperature vary. Regarding the Dense Particle Suspension Heat eXchanger (DPS-HX) train that provides the heat input to the gas turbine’s working air, a particular attention is paid to the particle-side layout.

A decent net cycle efficiency can be achieved by a two-reheat topping cycle with a TET of 600°C, with equal expansion ratios and a 3 pressure-reheat Rankine cycle at 160-20-3 bars / 585 / 575°C. Further increasing the low pressure (LP) turbine expansion ratio would result in a less bulky and cheaper LP DPS-HX, at the expense of cycle efficiency. Adjusting the HP and IP pressure ratios can simplify the particle-side layout of the DPS-HX train, again at the expense of efficiency (at least 0.5% pt).

With a two-reheat topping cycle, the particles cannot be expected to enter the receiver at a temperature far below 600°C. The impact of that high receiver inlet temperature and of the resulting moderate storage density on the plant’s efficiency and economics should be discussed further. Similarly, a detailed techno-economic optimization of the DPS-HX train should be performed in order to define the optimal pressure drops and temperature differences.

1.
IRENA
, “
Concentrating Solar Power
”, in
Renewable Energy Technologies: Cost Analysis Series
,
2012
2.
K.
Lovegrove
and
W.
Stein
,
Concentrating Solar Power Technology: Principles, Developments and Applications
(
Woodhead
,
Oxford
,
2012
)
3.
J.
Baeyens
and
H.
Zhang
, “
Next-CSP Deliverable 1.1 – Report on particle selection for solar heat capture and storage
”, April
2017
4.
R.
Gicquel
,
Systèmes Energétiques
(
Les presses de l’Ecole des Mines
,
Paris
,
2009
)
5.
J. H.
Peterseim
and
A.
Veeraragavan
, “
Solar Towers with Supercritical Steam Parameters - is the Efficiency Gain worth the Effort?
”,
Energy Procedia
69
(
2009
), pp.
1123
1132
6.
J.
Dyreby
,
S.
Klein
,
G.
Nellis
, and
D.
Reindl
, “
Design Considerations for Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Brayton Cycles With Recompression
”,
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
136
(
2014
)
7.
N.
Fraidenraich
,
J. M.
Gordon
, and
C.
Tiba
, “
Optimization of gas-turbine combined cycles for solar energy and alternative-fuel power generation
”,
Solar Energy
48
(
1992
), pp.
301
307
8.
K. A.
Al-attab
and
Z. A.
Zainal
, “
Externally fired gas turbine technology: A review
”,
Applied Energy
138
(
2015
), pp.
474
487
9.
C.
Andreades
,
R. O.
Scarlat
,
L.
Dempsey
, and
P.
Peterson
, “
Reheat-Air Brayton Combined Cycle Power Conversion Design and Performance Under Nominal Ambient Conditions
”,
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
136
(
2014
)
10.
C.
Andreades
,
L.
Dempsey
, and
P. F.
Peterson
, “
Reheat Air-Brayton Combined Cycle Power Conversion Off-Nominal and Transient Performance
”,
Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
136
(
2014
)
11.
M.
Puppe
 et al., “
Hybrid High Solar Share Gas Turbine Systems with Innovative Gas Turbine Cycles
”,
Energy Procedia
69
(
2015
), pp.
1393
1403
12.
F.
Siros
and
G. Fernández
Campos
, “Optimisation of a Low-TIT Combined Cycle Gas Turbine With Application to New Generation Solar Thermal Power Plants”,
ASME Turbo Expo Proceedings
(
ASME
,
Charlotte, North Carolina
,
2017
)
This content is only available via PDF.