From the solid waste of palm oil, i.e. empty fruit bunch (EFB), sugar can be produced through the hydrolysis process by using hydrochloric acid (HCl). The acid must be separated from the sugar to yield pure sugar and to reduce the processing costs by recovering and recycling the hydrochloric acid. Electrodialysis (ED) which is a membrane separation characterized by an electrical field orthogonal to the membrane, is a feasible method for acid recovery. Since, it has the capability of separated ionic chemicals from nonionic chemicals in process or waste streams to achieve product purity. Optimum operating conditions are very important for the electrodialysis process to ensure maximum ED performances. The Nernst-Planck derived relationship is used to build the dynamic model which contains of set ordinary differential equations (ODE). The dynamic optimization problem is solved using a direct method, i.e. orthogonal collocation (OC), control vector parameterization (CVP) and multiple shooting (MS). The economic function which is intended to minimize energy consumption for achieving 99% of acid recovery is considered as objective function. The performances of those direct-based dynamic optimization techniques which are the accuracy and the efficiency in optimal computation are compared and analyzed. The accuracy in searching optimal solution is based on the minimum energy consumption and maximum acid recovery obtained. While, the efficiency of the dynamic optimization’s computation is evaluated by CPU time consumed. The optimization results shows that the control trajectories obtained from OC able to generate the lowest energy consumption with maximum acid recovery at the acceptable CPU time.

1.
A.
Ideris
, “
Palm Oil Empty Fruit Bunch Hydrolysis: Process and Optimization Studies
”, Thesis,
University of Science Malaysia
,
2005
.
2.
G.
Cifuentes
,
N.
Guajardo
,
J.
Hernandez
, “
Recovery of Hydrochloric Acid from Ion Exchange Processes by Reactive Electrodialysis
Journal of the Chilean Chemical Society
60
,
2711
2715
(
2015
)
3.
L.
Karimi
,
A.
Ghassemi
,
H. Z.
Sabzi
, “
Quantitative studies of electrodialysis performance
”,
Desalination
445
,
159
169
(
2018
).
4.
A. J.
Ward
,
K.
Arola
,
E. T.
Brewster
,
C. M.
Mehta
,
D. J.
Batstone
, “
Nutrient recovery from wastewater through pilot scale electrodialysis
”,
Water Research
135
,
57
65
(
2018
).
5.
F. S.
Rohman
,
N.
Aziz
, “
Optimization of batch electrodialysis for hydrochloric acid recovery using orthogonal collocation method
”,
Desalination
275
,
37
49
(
2011
).
6.
B.
Srinivasan
,
S.
Palanki
, and
D.
Bonvin
, ”
Dynamic optimization of batch processes I. Characterization of nominal solution
”,
Computers and Chemical Engineering
27
,
1
26
(
2003
).
7.
B.
Houska
,
H.J.
Ferreau
, and
M.
Diehl
, “
ACADO toolkit—An open-source framework for automatic control and dynamic optimization
”,
Optimal Control Applications Methods
32
,
298
312
(
2011
).
8.
Y.
Tanaka
, “
Mass transport and energy consumption in ion-exchange membrane electrodialysis of seawater
”,
Journal of Membrane Science
215
,
265
279
(
2003
).
9.
H.
Wesselingh
,
G.
Kraaijevald
,
V.
Sumberova
,
S.
Kuindersma
, “
Modeling electrodialysis using the Maxwell-Stefan description
”,
Chemical Engineering Journal
57
,
163
176
(
1995
).
10.
R.P.
Buck
, “
Kinetics of bulk and interfacial ionic motion: microscopic bases and limits of the Nernst–Planck equation applied to membrane systems
”,
Journal of Membrane Science
17
,
1
62
(
1984
).
11.
F. S.
Rohman
,
M. R.
Othman
,
N.
Aziz
, “
Modeling of batch electrodialysis for hydrochloric acid recovery
Chemical Engineering Journal
162
,
466
479
(
2010
)
12.
H.J.
Lee
,
S.H.
Moon
and
S.P.
Tsai
, “
Effects of pulsed electric fields on membrane fouling in electrodialysis of NaCl solution
”,
Separation and Purification Technology
27
,
89
95
(
2002
)
13.
M.
Cizniar
,
M.
Fikar
,
M.A.
Latifi
, “
Dynamic Optimization of Processes
”, Diploma Work, pnSlovak Technical University in
Bratislava
,
2005
.
14.
J. E.
Cuthrell
and
L.T.
Biegler
, “
On the optimization of differential-algebraic process systems
AIChE J.
33
,
1257
1270
(
1987
).
15.
E.
Balsa-Canto
,
D.
Henriques
,
A.
Gábor
,
J. R.
Banga
, “
AMIGO2, a toolbox for dynamic modeling, optimization and control in systems biology
Bioinformatics
32
,
3357
3359
(
2016
).
16.
V. S.
Vassiliadis
,
R. W. H.
Sargent
, and
C. C.
Pantelides
, “
Solution of a class of multistage dynamic optimization problems. 1. problems without path constraints, 2. problems with path constraints
”.
Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research
33
,
2111
2122
, 2123–2133(
1994
).
17.
H.
Bock
,
K.
Plitt
, “
A multiple shooting algorithm for direct solution of optimal control problems
”, in:
Proceedings of the 9th IFAC World Congress Budapest
,
Pergamon
,
Oxford
,
1984
.
18.
T. F.
Edgar
,
D. M.
Himmelblau
, and
L. S.
Lasdon
, “
Optimization of Chemical Processes
”.
McGraw-Hill
,
New York, USA
,
2001
.
19.
M.
Fidaelo
and
M.
Moresi
, “
Optimal strategy to model the electrodialytic recovery of a strong electrolyte
”,
Journal of Membrane Science
260
,
90
111
(
2005
).
20.
A.
Mesbah
,
J.
Landlust
,
A.E.M.
Huesman
,
H.J.M.
Kramer
,
P. J.
Jansens
,
P. M. J.
Van den Hof
, “
A model-based control framework for industrial batch crystallization processes
”,
Chemical Engineering Research and Design
88
,
1223
1233
(
2010
).
This content is only available via PDF.