The United States has a major deficit in the proportion of women earning degrees in physics, peaking around 20%. To promote excellence and maximize creativity, additional efforts to diversify the physics community must be implemented. Challenges to improving the proportion of female physicists include microaggressions, active discouragement, poor advising or mentoring, inadequate acknowledgement of achievements, sexual harassment, and many others. The latest research on gender bias suggests two main underlying psychological themes that explain much of the behavioral bias: implicit (unconscious) bias and stereotype threat. To ensure that excellence is not compromised, we need to guarantee that our entire population has access to adequate resources and the necessary support structures for success. To fully understand women in physics, we must also examine the many obstacles that women of various identities face in efforts to navigate their academic and professional careers. These identities may be related not only to gender but also to race, ethnicity, language, religion, social class, or sexuality. Increasing women’s participation in physics requires increased access to high school physics courses, funding opportunities to attend college, availability of research opportunities, and access to and support from professional societies. These approaches will enhance the culture in physics, leading to gender equity, social equity, and improved social justice for many people.

1.
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics
, Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2017, Special report NSF 17-310 (
National Science Foundation
,
Arlington, VA
,
2017
), https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17310/.
2.
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics
,
Science and Engineering Degrees: 1966–2012
, NSF 15-326, (
National Science Foundation
,
Arlington, VA
,
2015
), https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2015/nsf15326/.
3.
R. S.
Barthelemy
,
M.
McCormick
, and
C.
Henderson
,
Gender discrimination in physics and astronomy: Graduate student experiences of sexism and gender microaggressions
,
Physical Review Physics Education Research
12
,
020119
(
2016
).
4.
S.
Traweek
,
Beamtimes and Lifetimes
(
Harvard University Press
,
Cambridge
,
1988
).
5.
D.
Solórzano
,
M.
Ceja
, and
T.
Yosso
,
Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students
,
Journal of Negro Education
69
(
1–2
),
60
73
(
2000
).
6.
D. W.
Sue
,
Microaggressions in Everyday Life: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation
(
John Wiley & Sons
,
Hoboken, NJ
,
2010
).
7.
K.
Rosa
and
F. M.
Mensah
,
Educational pathways of Black women physicists: Stories of experiencing and overcoming obstacles in life
,
Physical Review Physics Education Research
12
,
020113
(
2016
).
8.
A.
Johnson
,
M.
Ong
,
L.
Ko
,
J.
Smith
, and
A.
Hodari
,
Common challenges faced by women of color in physics, and actions faculty can take to minimize those challenges
,
The Physics Teacher
55
(
6
),
356
(
2017
).
9.
M.
Ong
,
J. M.
Smith
, and
L. T.
Ko
,
Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success
,
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
,
55
(
2
),
206
245
(
2018
).
10.
D. I.
Miller
,
A. H.
Eagly
, and
M. C.
Linn
,
Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations
,
Journal of Educational Psychology
107
,
631
(
2015
).
11.
K.
Dutt
,
D. L.
Pfaff
,
A. F.
Bernstein
,
J. S.
Dillard
, and
C. J.
Block
,
Gender differences in recommendation letters for postdoctoral fellowships in geoscience
,
Nature Geoscience
9
,
805
808
(
2016
).
12.
G. C.
Marchand
and
G.
Taasoobshirazi
,
Stereotype threat and women’s performance in physics
,
International Journal of Science Education
35
,
3050
3061
(
2013
).
13.
P. M.
Gonzales
,
H.
Blanton
, and
K. J.
Williams
,
The effects of stereotype threat and double-minority status on the test performance of Latino women
,
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
28
,
659
670
(
2002
).
14.
G.
Anzaldúa
,
Borderlands/La frontera
, 2nd ed. (
Aunt Lute Books
,
San Francisco
,
1999
).
15.
P. H.
Collins
,
Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas
,
Annual Review of Sociology
41
,
1
20
(
2015
).
16.
C.
Moraga
and
G.
Anzaldúa
, This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color (
SUNY Press
,
Albany, NY
,
2015
).
17.
P. H.
Collins
,
Gender, Black feminism, and Black political economy
,
Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
568
,
41
53
(
2000
).
18.
B.
Guy-Sheftall
, Words of Fire: An Anthology of African-American Feminist Thought (
The New Press
,
New York
,
1995
).
19.
A.
Lorde
,
Sister Outsider
(
The Crossing Press
,
Freedom, CA
,
1984
).
20.
M. B.
Zinn
and
B. T.
Dill
,
Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism, Feminist Studies
22
,
321
331
(
1996
).
21.
Timothy J.
Atherton
,
Ramón S.
Barthelemy
,
Wouter
Deconinck
,
Michael L.
Falk
,
Savannah
Garmon
,
Elena
Long
,
Monica
Plisch
,
Elizabeth H.
Simmons
, and
Kyle
Reeves
,
LGBT Climate in Physics: Building an Inclusive Community
(
American Physical Society
,
College Park, MD
,
2016
).
22.
U.
Treisman
,
Studying students studying calculus: A look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college
,
The College Mathematics Journal
23
,
362
372
(
1992
).
23.
R.
Fullilove
and
U.
Treisman
,
Mathematics achievement among African American undergraduates at the University of California, Berkeley: An evaluation of the Mathematics Workshop Program
,
The Journal of Negro Education
59
,
463
478
(
1990
).
24.
A.
Jamieson
,
L.
Jamieson
, and
A.
Johnson
,
Application of non-programming focused Treisman-style workshops in introductory computer science
,
SIGCSE 12: Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
,
Raleigh, NC
, February 29–March 03,
2012
),
271
276
.
25.
S. R.
Mills
,
Academic Excellence Workshops in Chemistry and Physics
, Ph.D. thesis,
The Claremont Graduate University
,
1999
.
26.
S.-J.
Leslie
,
A.
Cimpian
,
M.
Meyer
, and
E.
Freeland
,
Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines
,
Science
347
,
262
265
(
2015
).
27.
Andrew Trotman, Microsoft Corporation
, Why Europe’s girls aren’t studying STEM, DOI (
2017
).
Andrew Trotman, “Why don’t European girls like science or technology?
Microsoft News Centre Europe, Microsoft Corporation
, March 1,
2017
, https://news.microsoft.com/europe/features/dont-european-girls-like-science-technology/.
28.
NASA Summer of Innovation: Excellence in Summer Learning Benchmarking Study
,
Booz Allen Hamilton
,
2011
, https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/soi_2011_benchmarking_study.pdf.
This content is only available via PDF.