The turbidity and precipitation affect seriously sensory quality of chaenomeles juice and wine. In order to reduce the harmful effects of turbid chaenomeles juice on fermentation and to ensure the sensory quality of fruit wine, pectinase was used to clarify chaenomeles juice in this experiment. The gradient of pectinase dosage was designed into 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45 mg/L. The optimum dosage of pectinase selected was used for clarifying chaenomeles juice. chemical clarification method (bentonite and chitosan) was employed to clarify and stabilize the raw wine, improve its appearance and reduce the risk of diseases in the storage process, by designing the gradient of bentonite dosage, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3 g/L to select the most suitable amount of bentonite, whereas the gradient of chitosan for 1.2, 1.5, 1.8, 2.1, 2.4 and 2.7 g/L to the same effect. The optimum dosage of bentonite and chitosan were applied to chaenomeles wine to analyze and compare the clarifying effect of both two to wine, while the clarification indexes, such as anthocyanin content, turbidity, chroma and light transmittance were determined. The best dosage of pectinase was selected as 35 mg/L, the color 2.425, the light transmittance 54.7% and the best clarification effect of chaenomeles juice was obtained after clarifying 5 h. The best clarifying effect was obtained under the light permeability 29.3% and turbidity 90.04 NTU in chaenomeles wine through the best bentonite dosage of 1.0 g/L after clarifiing 12 h. While the best dosage of chitosan to clarify the chaenomeles wine was 1.8 g/L, which made the light permeability 9.80% and the turbidity 199.2 NTU after 12 h. The chaenomeles juice treated with 35 mg/L pectinase had higher the clarification efficiency and effect, and the color remained intact. While the clarifying effect of 1.0 g/L bentonite solution on chaenomeles liquor was better than that of 1.8 g/L chitosan treatment.

1.
O. S.
Lukanin
,
S. M.
Gunko
,
M. T.
Bryk
and
R. R.
Nigmatullin
,
J. Food Eng.
60
,
275
280
(
2003
).
2.
A.
Mierczynska-Vasilev
and
P. A.
Smith
,
Aus. J. Grape Wine R.
21
,
615
626
(
2015
).
3.
J. C.
Lin
,
L. H.
Zhu
,
Z. P.
Wan
,
Z. M.
Huang
and
G. Q.
Chen
,
Food Sci.
12
,
074
(
2006
).
4.
S. C.
Van Sluyter
,
J. M.
McRae
,
R. J.
Falconer
,
P. A.
Smith
,
A.
Bacic
,
E. J.
Waters
and
M.
Marangon
,
J. Agr. Food Chem.
63
,
4020
4030
(
2015
).
5.
K.
Jeyaram
, “
Studies on the selection of suitable yeast cultures and standardization of fermentation conditions for wine making from Banana, Papaya and Grapes
” Ph.D. thesis,
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University
,
2002
.
6.
X.
Zhang
,
H.
Wu
and
C.
Wang
,
Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering
,
29
,
267
276
(
2013
).
7.
M.
Rinaudo
,
Prog. Polym. Sci.
31
,
603
632
(
2006
).
8.
V.
Rungsardthong
,
N.
Wongvuttanakul
,
N.
Kongpien
and
P.
Chotiwaranon
,
Process Biochem.
41
,
589
593
(
2006
).
9.
J.
Oszmianski
,
M.
Wolniak
,
A.
Wojdylo
and
I.
Wawer
,
J. Sci. Food Agr.
87
,
573
579
(
2007
).
10.
L.
Tran
,
S. H.
Ching
and
C. U.S.
Turner
, Patent Application No. 14/648,292 (
2015
).
11.
A. L.
Fudge
,
M.
Schiettecatte
,
R.
Ristic
,
Y.
Hayasaka
and
K. L.
Wilkinson
,
Aust. J. Grape Wine R.
18
,
302
307
(
2012
).
12.
M.
Esti
,
I.
Benucci
,
C.
Lombardelli
,
K.
Liburdi
and
A. M. V.
Garzillo
,
Food Bioprod. Process.
91
,
595
598
(
2013
).
13.
I.
Benucci
,
C.
Lombardelli
,
K.
Liburdi
,
G.
Acciaro
,
M.
Zappino
and
M.
Esti
,
J. Food Sci. Tech.
53
,
1130
1139
(
2016
).
14.
H. Mine
Kurtbay
,
Z.
Bekçi
,
M.
Merdivan
and
K.
Yurdakoç
,
J. Agr. Food Chem.
56
,
2541
2545
(
2008
).
15.
A.
Patras
,
N. P.
Brunton
,
C.
O’Donnell
and
B. K.
Tiwari
,
Trends Food Sci. Tech.
21
,
3
11
(
2010
).
16.
C. L.
Luchese
,
N.
Sperotto
,
J. C.
Spada
and
I. C.
Tessaro
,
Int. J. Biol. Macromol.
104
,
11
18
(
2017
).
17.
D.
Lemlioglu-Austin
,
N. D.
Turner
,
C. M.
McDonough
and
L. W.
Rooney
,
Molecules
,
17
,
11124
11138
(
2012
).
18.
Y.
Xu
,
S.
Purton
and
F.
Baganz
,
Bioresource Technol.
129
,
296
301
(
2013
).
19.
O.
Tastan
and
T.
Baysal
,
Food Chem.
180
,
211
218
(
2015
).
20.
L. T.
Cesar
,
M.
de Freitas Cabral
,
G. A.
Maia
,
R. W.
de Figueiredo
,
M. R. A.
de Miranda
,
P. H. M.
de Sousa
,
I. M.
Brasil
and
C. L.
Gomes
,
J. Food Sci. Tech.
51
,
3293
3300
(
2014
).
21.
M.
Cerreti
,
K.
Liburdi
,
I.
Benucci
,
S. E.
Spinelli
,
C.
Lombardelli
and
M.
Esti
,
LWT-Food Sci. Technol.
82
,
58
65
(
2017
).
22.
L.
Zhang
, “
The effects of high pressure processing, browning additives, and storage period on the inactivation of polyphenol oxidase in nine varieties of pawpaw (Asimina Triloba L.) pulp
” MS thesis,
Ohio University
,
2016
.
23.
L.
Sánchez-González
,
C.
Pastor
,
M.
Vargas
,
A.
Chiralt
,
C.
González-Martínez
and
M.
Cháfer
,
Postharvest Biol. Tec.
60
,
57
63
(
2011
).
This content is only available via PDF.