There is still uncertainty concerning processes and conditions inside the cylinder during gas injection in injection foam molding. Apart from static solubility and its measurement, determination of dynamic solubility is of great interest for the operator in order not to overload the melt. Our development of a novel measurement method makes the detection of the ultimate limit of solvable amount of gas at certain process conditions prior to production possible, using the compression modulus of the gas-polymer-solution in a MuCell®-process. The method is based on the fact that the compressibility of a polymer-gas-solution beyond its solubility limit (i.e. under presence of a second, discrete gas phase) drops sharply. Based on three different versions of a polypropylene homopolymer dynamic solubility measurements at different pressures were carried out. Depending on material formulation and process conditions dynamic solubility limits between 0.6 wt% and 3.6 wt% nitrogen were measured. For verification of the obtained results, ultrasonic measurements were conducted simultaneously. Excellent agreement between the two methods was observed. For the whole test procedure, a measurement flange was used. However, it could be shown that the compression modulus can also be determined without any additional equipment. This simple yet innovative method yields new insights in terms of process limits and conditions inside the barrel. Future developments should include the fully-automatic self-adjustment of the machine.

1.
F.
Johannaber
and
W.
Michaeli
,
Handbuch Spritzgießen
,
Munich
:
Carl Hanser Verlag
,
2004
, p.
397
.
2.
V.
Altstädt
and
A.
Mantey
, „Historie des Schaumspritzgießen“ in
Thermoplast-Schaumspritzgießen
,
Munich
:
Carl Hanser Verlag
,
2011
, pp.
7
13
.
3.
A.
Kramschuster
,
R.
Cavitt
,
D.
Ermer
,
Z.
Chen
and
L.-S.
Turng
,
Polymer Engineering and Science
45
, pp.
1408
1418
(
2005
).
4.
S.
Wong
,
J. W. S.
Lee
,
H. E.
Naguib
and
C. B.
Park
,
Macromolecular Materials and Engineering
293
, pp.
605
613
(
2008
).
5.
K.
Hikita
,
JSAE Review
23
, pp.
239
244
(
2002
).
6.
S.-T.
Lee
, “History and Trends of Polymeric Foams: From Process/Product to Performance/Regulation” in
Polymeric Foams
, edited by
S.-T.
Lee
and
D.
Scholz
,
Boca Raton
:
CRC Press
,
2009
, pp.
1
40
.
7.
J.
Xu
,
Microcellular Injection Molding
,
New Jersey
:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
,
2010
, p.
2
3
.
8.
X.
Xu
and
C. B.
Park
“Injection Foam Molding” in
Injection Molding
, edited by
M. R.
Kamal
,
A. I.
Isayev
and
S.-J.
Liu
,
Munich
:
Carl Hanser Verlag
,
2009
, pp.
273
308
.
9.
Y.
Sato
,
T.
Takikawa
,
S.
Takishima
and
H.
Masuoka
,
Journal of Supercritical Fluids
19
, pp.
187
198
(
2001
).
10.
B.
Wong
,
Z.
Zhang
and
Y. P.
Handa
,
Journal of Polymer Science: Part B: Polymer Physics
36
, pp.
2025
2032
(
1998
).
11.
S.
Takishima
,
K.
Nakamura
,
M.
Sasaki
and
H.
Masuoka
,
Journal of The Japan Petroleum Institute
33
, pp.
332
336
(
1990
).
12.
J.
Comyn
,
Polymer Permeability
,
London
:
Chapman & Hall
, p.
7
.
13.
Y.
Sato
,
K.
Fujiwara
,
T.
Takikawa
,
Sumarno
,
S.
Takishima
and
H.
Masuoka
,
Fluid Phase Equilibria
162
, pp.
261
276
(
1999
).
14.
S.T.
Lee
, „Introduction: Polymeric Foams, Mechanisms, and Materials“ in
Polymeric Foams: Mechanisms and Materials
, edited by
S.T.
Lee
and
N.S.
Ramesh
,
Boca Raton
:
CRC Press
,
2004
.
15.
C.
Lee
,
S.
Himanshu
and
K.
Roland
,
Polymer Engineering and Science
41
, pp.
990
997
(
2001
).
16.
I. C.
Sanchez
and
R. H.
Lacombe
,
The Journal of Physical Chemistry
80
, pp.
2352
2362
(
1976
).
17.
I. C.
Sanchez
and
R. H.
Lacombe
,
Macromolecules
11
, pp.
1145
1156
(
1978
).
18.
G.
Li
,
F.
Gunkel
,
J.
Wang
,
C. B.
Park
and
V.
Altstädt
,
Journal of Applied Polymer Science
103
, pp.
2945
2953
(
2007
).