Brassica juncea was one of the important leaf vegetables which had important edible value, and was popular with consumers. Brassica juncea cv. four seasons shuidong sweet crisp mustard had characteristics of flesh crispy, tasted sweet and delicious. And have high resistance to disease, rain and heat. It also have advantages of not easy to bolting in the growth process, high yield, and can be planted throughout the year. Therefor it had been widely cultivated in many places of China. In this study, we measured and calculated seven chromosome parameters of ’four seasons shuidong sweet crisp mustard’: chromosome length, relative length index, relative length type, arm ratio, centromere index and centromere type. Chromosomal analysis was carried out. The experiment results showed that the karyotype formula was 2n=36=24m+12sm and the maximum chromosome length was measured 3.70 µm and max arm ratio was determined 2.39, relative length ranged between 3.28% to 7.84%. There are four types of relative length, including long (L), medium long (M2), medium short (M1) and short (S) chromosomes. In addition, the maximum centromeric index was measured in 45.82%, centromere type were metacentric (m) and submetacentric chromosomes (sm), while the number of m was more than sm. Karyotype asymmetry index was 62.04%, and the karyotype characteristics was type 2B according to Stebbins’s classification criteria. According to the above information, we can drawn a conclusion that ’four seasons shuidong sweet crisp mustard’ is a relatively primitive mustard variety. The findings revealed its karyotypic characteristics of ’four seasons shuidong sweet crisp mustard’ from the cytogenetic aspects.

1.
Wang
J.L.
,
He
Y.
, and
Zhang
Y.Q.
, et al 
A study on origin, evolution and spread of Brassica in china
.
Zhongguo Nongxue Tongbao.
Vol.
22
(
2006
) No.
8
, p.
489
494
2.
Wang
X.R.
,
Tang
H.R.
,
Duan
J.
, et al 
A comparative study on karyotypes of 28 taxa in Rubus sect. Idaeobatus and sect. Malachobatus (Rosaceae) from China
.
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
, Vol.
46
(
2008
) No.
4
, p.
505
515
.
3.
Li
M.X.
, and
Chen
R.Y.
A suggestion on the standardization of karyotype analysis in plants
.
Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research.
Vol.
3
(
1985
) No.
4
, p.
297
302
.
4.
Levan
A.
,
Fradga
K.
, and
Sandberg
A.A.
Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes
.
Hereditas.
Vol.
52
(
1964
) No.
2
, p.
201
220
.
5.
Arano
H.
The karyotypes and the speciations in subfamily Carduoideae (Compositae) of Japan
.
Japanese Journal of Botany.
Vol.
19
(
1965
) No.
3
, p.
31
67
.
6.
Stebbins
G.L.
 Chromosomal evolution in higher plants.
Edward Arnold Ltd. Press
,
London
,
1971
, p.
87
123
.
7.
Fang
P.
,
Chen
F.B.
, and
Yao
Q.L.
, et al 
karyotype analysis on three types of leaf mustard (Brassica juncea)
.
Journal of changjiang vegetables.
Vol.
12
(
2014
), p.
13
17
.
8.
Xu
D.M.
,
Chen
F.B.
, and
Jiang
Q.Q.
, et al 
karyotype analysis of three types of tuber mustard (Brassica juncea)
.
Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences.
Vol.
43
(
2014
) No.
3
, p.
111
115
.
9.
Du
W.
,
Chen
Q.X.
, and
Mo
H.
, et al 
Study on somatic chromosome karyotypes of xinjiang wild rape, B. Campestris, B. Nigra, and B. Juncea
.
Journal of August 1st Agricultural College.
Vol.
16
(
1993
) No.
4
, p.
26
31
.