Brassica juncea cv. bianhachi big flesh sweet mustard had the flat bone and thick flesh, the flesh was sweet, mouth fragrance, the less fiber, and with high quality characteristic. Moreover, the market demand for this variety is large and popular with gourmets and restaurants. In this research, we try to obtain cytological parameters on ’bianhachi big flesh sweet mustard’. The experiment results showed that the maximum chromosome length was measured 4.72 µm and max arm ratio was determined 2.25, relative length ranged between 3.08% to 8.29%. There are four types of relative length, including short (S), medium short (M1), medium long (M2) and long (L) chromosomes. In addition, the maximum centromeric index was measured in 44.60%, centromere type were submetacentric chromosomes (sm) and metacentric chromosomes (m). Karyotype asymmetry index was 61.561%, and the karyotype formula was 2n=2x=36=24m+12sm. The karyotype characteristics was type 2B according to Stebbins’s classification criteria. According to the above information, we can drawn a conclusion that ’bianhachi big flesh sweet mustard’ is a relatively primitive mustard variety. The findings revealed its karyotypic characteristics of ’bianhachi big flesh sweet mustard’ from the cytogenetic aspects. The results also provided the basis and reference for the inheritance and breeding, identification and development of mustard germplasm resources.

1.
Wang
J.L.
,
He
Y.
, and
Zhang
Y.Q.
, et al 
A study on origin, evolution and spread of Brassica in china
.
Zhongguo Nongxue Tongbao.
Vol.
22
(
2006
) No.
8
, p.
489
494
2.
Wang
X.R.
,
Tang
H.R.
,
Duan
J.
, et al 
A comparative study on karyotypes of 28 taxa in Rubus sect. Idaeobatus and sect. Malachobatus (Rosaceae) from China
.
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
, Vol.
46
(
2008
) No.
4
, p.
505
515
.
3.
Li
M.X.
, and
Chen
R.Y.
A suggestion on the standardization of karyotype analysis in plants
.
Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research.
Vol.
3
(
1985
) No.
4
, p.
297
302
.
4.
Levan
A.
,
Fradga
K.
, and
Sandberg
A.A.
Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes
.
Hereditas.
Vol.
52
(
1964
) No.
2
, p.
201
220
.
5.
Arano
H.
The karyotypes and the speciations in subfamily Carduoideae (Compositae) of Japan
.
Japanese Journal of Botany.
Vol.
19
(
1965
) No.
3
, p.
31
67
.
6.
Stebbins
G.L.
 Chromosomal evolution in higher plants.
Edward Arnold Ltd. Press
,
London
,
1971
, p.
87
123
.
7.
Tong
N.K.
Observation on karyotype and chromosome behavior of different varieties of mustard
.
Journal of Southwest Agricultural University.
Vol.
13
(
1991
) No.
3
, p.
321
324
8.
Song
J.J
,
Zhang
D.H.
and
Shao
S.M.
Karyotype of several Brassica vegetables cultivated in Chaoshan area
.
Journal of Shantou University (Natural Science)
. Vol.
16
(
2001
) No.
1
, p.
1001
4217
.
9.
Du
W.
,
Chen
Q.X.
, and
Mo
H.
, et al 
Study on somatic chromosome karyotypes of Xinjiang wild rape, B.Campestris, B.Nigra, and B. Juncea
.
Journal of August 1st Agricultural College.
Vol.
16
(
1993
) No.
4
, p.
26
31
.
This content is only available via PDF.