This research describes the implementation of Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) assessment on physics learning at Senior High School which covers the understanding of physics teachers related to HOTS, the implementation of HOTS asessment, and the media employed to administrate HOTS assessment. The research subjects were physics teachers from 30 senior high schools in Special Region of Yogyakarta. The subjects were selected randomly by considering the level of school. The data were collected by using questionaires, observation form, dan interview guidelines. The data collected were analyzed using quantitative descriptive analysis. The four categorical data (polytomous) were analyzed using the percentation of each category and supported by the interview report. The result of the research indicated that, in general, the HOTS understanding of physics teachers were low. It was considered to be low and very low, with the score respectively 9.77% and 76.44%. There were 13.79% teachers included in high level, but no one considered to have very high level of understanding (See Figure 1). Figure 2 shows that the implementation of HOTS assessment was in very low and low level with the score respectively 29.06% and 62.07%. There were 8.87% included in high level and no one in very high level. Therefore, the implementation of HOTS assessment were considered to be low. The assessment media used were paper and pencil test (PPT), Computer Based Test (CBT), and Computer Adaptive Test (CAT). Figure 3 shows that most of teachers were using PPT, rarely use CBT and nearly never use CAT.

1.
Barak
,
M.
, &
Dori
,
Y. J.
, “
Enhancing undergraduate students’ chemistry understanding through project-based learning in an IT environment
”,
Science Education
89
,
117
139
(
2005
).
2.
Liliasari
, “
Peningkatan Mutu Guru dalam Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi melalui Model Pembelajaran Kapita Selekta Kimia Sekolah Lanjutan
”,
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains
3
,
174
181
(
2003
).
3.
Jensen
,
J. L.
,
McDaniel
,
M. A.
,
Woodard
,
S. M.
, &
Kummer
,
T. A
,
2014
,
Teaching to the Test or Testing to Teach: Exams Requiring Higher Order Thinking Skills Encourage Greater Conceptual Understanding
,
Educational Psychology Review
26
,
307
329
(2014).
4.
Siswoyo
&
Sunaryo
, “
High Order Thinking Skills: Analisis Soal dan Implementasinya dalam Pembelajaran Fisika di Sekolah Menengah Atas
”,
Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika
3
,
11
20
(
2017
).
5.
Pratama
,
N.S
&
Istiyono
.
E.
,
Studi Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Higher Order Thinking (Hots) Pada Kelas X Di SMA Negeri Kota Yogyakarta
(
Seminar Nasional Fisika dan Pendidikan Fisika
,
Surakarta
,
2015
) p.
104
112
6.
Barnett
,
J.E
&
Francis
,
A.L.
, “
Using higher order thinking questions to foster critical thinking: a classroom study
”,
Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychologgy
4
,
25
28
(
2012
).
7.
Brookhart
,
S.M.
,
How to assess higher order thinking skills in your classroom
(
ASCD
,
Alexandria
,
12
(
2010
)
8.
Djemari
Mardapi
.,
Pengukuran penilaian & evaluasi pendidikan
, (
Mitra Cendikia Offset Yogyakarta
,
110
(
2012
)
9.
Conklin
,
W.
, “
Higher order thinking skills to develop 21st century learners
”,
Journal of Education and Practice
8
,
108
121
(
2012
).
10.
Susanti
,
E.
,
Kusumah
,
Y.S.
,
Sabandar
,
J.
, &
Darhim
., “
Computer-assisted realistic mathematics education for enhancing students’ higher order thinking skills (experimental study in junior high school in Palembang, Indonesia
)”,
Jurnal of Education and Practice
5
,
51
58
(
2004
).
11.
Heong
,
Y.M.
,
Othman
,
W.B.
&
Yunos
,
J.M.
, “
The level of Marzano higher order thinking skills among technical education students
”,
International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity
11
,
121
125
(
2011
).
12.
Magyar
,
Andrea
,
Comparing the Measurement Effectiveness of Computer-Based Linear and Adaptive Test
.
University of Szeged
,
Szeged
,
10
(
2015
).
13.
Brookhart
,
S. M.
,
How to Assess Higher Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom.
(
ASCD
,
Alexandria
,
14
(
2010
)
14.
Tajudin
,
Nor’ain
Mohd.
&
Chinnappan
Mohan
., “
The Link between Higher Order Thinking Skills, Representation and Concepts in Enhancing TIMSS Tasks
”,
International Journal of Instruction
9
,
199
214
(
2016
).
15.
FitzPatrick
Beverly
&
Schulz
Henry
., “
Do Curriculum Outcomes and Assessment Activities in Science Encourage Higher Order Thinking?
”,
Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education
15
,
305
329
(
2015
).
16.
Saido
,
Gulistan
Mohammed.
,
Siraj
,
Saedah.
,
Bin
Nordin
,
Abu
Bakar.
,
Al
Amedy
,
Omed
Saadallah
., “
Higher Order Thinking Skills Among Secondary School Students in Science Learning
”,
The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science
3
,
13
20
(
2015
).
17.
Nuh
,
Mohamad
.,
Act No. 152 about The Academic And Competency Qualification Standard of Educators
(
The Indonesia Ministry of Education and Culture
,
Jakarta
,
2014
) p.
5
6
.
18.
Krathwohl
,
D. R.
&
Anderson
,
L. W.
,
A taxonomy for learning, teaching, andassessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives
.
Longman
,
New York
,
30
(
2001
)
19.
Baswedan
,
Anies
.,
Act No. 21 About The Content Standard for Primary and Secondary Education
(
The Indonesia Ministry of Education and Culture
,
Jakarta
,
2016
) p.
2
20.
Istiyono
,
Edi
., “
Pengembangan Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika (PysTHOTS) Peserta didik SMA
”,
Jurnal Pendidikan dan Evaluasi Pendidikan
18
,
1
12
(
2014
).
21.
Bodmann
and
Robinson
, “
Speed amd Performance Differences among Computer-Based and Paper-Pencil Tests
”,
Journal of Educational Computing Research
31
,
51
60
(
2004
).
This content is only available via PDF.