For most high explosives, the ability to accelerate material to some terminal velocity scales with the ratio of material-mass to charge-mass (M/C) according to the Gurney model. In planar geometry, the Gurney model accurately estimates the terminal velocity of the driven material until M/C is reduced to 0.2 or lower. Below this value, gasdynamic departures from the assumptions of the model result in under-prediction of the material terminal velocity. In the present study, a modified Gurney model was used to predict the scaling of flyer velocity with M/C for explosives heavily diluted with either low density (3M K1 glass microballoons—GMBs), or high density (steel beads) diluent. The modified model accounted for explosive energy being transferred to accelerate the diluent. The model was compared with a series of flyer experiments propelled using either Poly(methyl methacrylate)-gelled nitromethane (96% NM/4% PMMA) diluted with 10% GMBs by mass or diethylenetriamine-sensitized liquid nitromethane saturating a packed bed of steel particles. Both grazing and normally incident detonations of the test mixtures were used to propel the flyers. The Gurney model accurately predicted the terminal velocity for the gelled NM/GMB mixture although it did not account for the contribution from the detonation shock nor the initiating slapper plate. The model failed to predict flyer velocity for the NM/steel mixture. The propulsive efficiency of this mixture increased with M/C relative to the baseline explosive so that the model under-predicted velocity for small M/C but over-predicted for large M/C.

1.
R. W.
Gurney
, “
The initial velocities of fragments from bombs, shell and grenades
,” Tech. Rep. BRL-405 (US Army Ballistic Research Laboratory,
1943
).
2.
W. P.
Walters
and
J. A.
Zukas
,
Fundamentals of Shaped Charges
(
Wiley-Interscience
,
New York, NY
,
1989
).
3.
J. E.
Kennedy
, in
Explosive Effects and Applications
, edited by
J. A.
Zukas
and
W. P.
Walters
(
Springer New York
,
New York, NY
,
1998
), pp.
221
257
.
4.
B. M.
Dobratz
, “
LNLL explosives handbook - properties of chemical explosives and explosive simulants
,” Tech. Rep. UCRL-52997 (
Lawrence Livermore National Lab
,
1982
).
5.
N. E.
Hoskin
,
J. W. S.
Allan
,
A.
Bailey
,
J. W.
Lethaby
, and
I. C.
Skidmore
, “
The motion of plates and cylinders driven by detonation waves at tangential incidence
,” in
4ᵗʰ International Symposium on Detonation
(
Office of Naval Research
,
White Oak, MD
,
1965
), pp.
14
26
.
6.
D. J.
Butz
,
J. E.
Backofen
, and
J. A.
Petrousky
,
J.
Ballistics
6
,
1304
1322
(
1982
).
7.
J.
Loiseau
,
W.
Georges
, and
A. J.
Higgins
,
Propellants, Explosives, Pyrotechnics
41
,
655
664
(
2016
).
8.
J. E.
Kennedy
, “
Gurney energy of explosives: Estimation of the velocity and impulse imparted to driven metal
,” Tech. Rep. SC-RR-70-90 (
Sandia National Laboratories
,
1970
).
9.
A. D.
Solem
and
B. H.
Singleton
, “
Rapid expansion of metal cylinders under explosive loading i: Studies of initial expansions with rotating mirror camera
,” Tech. Rep. NAVORD 2768 (
U.S Naval Ordnance Laboratory
,
1953
).
10.
S. J.
Jacobs
, “
The gurney formula: Variations on a theme by lagrange
,” Tech. Rep. NOLTR 74-86 (
Naval Ordnance Laboratory
,
1974
).
11.
L. L.
Davis
and
L. G.
Hill
,
AIP Conference Proceedings
620
,
165
16824
–29 June (
2002
).
12.
C. L.
Mader
,
J. D.
Kershner
, and
G. H.
Pimbley
,
Journal of Energetic Materials
1
,
293
324
(
1983
).
13.
J.
Loiseau
,
W.
Georges
,
A. J.
Higgins
, and
D. L.
Frost
,
Shock Waves
(Accepted August
2017
).
14.
P. C.
Souers
,
R.
Garza
,
H.
Hornig
,
L.
Lauderbach
,
C.
Owens
, and
P.
Vitello
,
Propellants, Explosives, Py-rotechnics
36
,
9
15
(
2011
).
This content is only available via PDF.