It has been suggested that the stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) are generated due to coherent reflections of forward-traveling waves. In this paper, the emissions were simulated by a two-dimensional hydrodynamic cochlea model with parameters based on real dimensions of the human cochlea. Simulations were done using a low-level pure tone at frequencies between 0.5 and 1.3 kHz, and 3 and 6 kHz. In agreement with animal experimental data, the ratio between the simulated SFOAE group delays and group delays estimated from the basilar membrane transfer functions were between 1 and 2. In agreement with the coherent reflection filtering theory, the SFOAE delay was affected by the frequency selectivity of the cochlear filters. However, the simulated results gave different tuning ratios for two models differing only in tuning of their cochlear filters.

1.
Kemp
DT
(
1978
)
Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system
.
J Acoust Soc Am
64
:
1386
1391
2.
Zweig
G
,
Shera
CA
(
1995
)
The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions
.
J Acoust Soc Am
98
(
4
):
2018
2047
3.
Shera
CA
,
Guinan
JJ
 Jr
(
2003
)
Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: A test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning
.
J Acoust Soc Am
113
(
5
):
2762
2772
4.
Glasberg
BR
,
Moore
BCJ
(
1990
)
Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data
.
Hear Res
47
:
103
138
5.
Shera
CA
,
Guinan
JJ
 Jr
,
Oxenham
AJ
(
2002
)
Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements
.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
99
(
5
):
3318
3323
6.
Siegel
JH
,
Cerka
AJ
,
Recio-Spinoso
A
,
Temchin
AN
,
van Dijk
P
,
Ruggero
MA
(
2005
)
Delays of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and cochlear vibrations contradict the theory of coherent reflection filtering
.
J Acoust Soc Am
118
(
4
):
2434
2443
7.
Shera
CA
,
Tubis
A
,
Talmadge
CL
(
2008
)
Testing coherent reflection in chinchilla: Auditory-nerve responses predict stimulus-frequency emissions
.
J Acoust Soc Am
124
(
1
):
381
395
8.
Manley
GA
,
van Dijk
P.
(
2016
)
Frequency selectivity of the human cochlea: Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions
.
Hear Res
336
:
53
62
9.
Lopez-Poveda
EA
,
Eustaquio-Martin
,
A
(
2013
)
On the controversy about the sharpness of human cochlear tuning
.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol
14
:
673
686
.
10.
Shera
CA
,
Guinan
JJ
 Jr
,
Oxenham
AJ
(
2010
)
Otoacoustic Estimation of Cochlear Tuning: Validation in the Chinchilla
.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol
11
:
343
365
.
11.
Nobili
R
,
Vetešník
A
,
Turicchia
L
,
Mammano
F
(
2003
)
Otoacoustic emissions from residual oscillations of the cochlear basilar membrane in a human ear model
.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol
4
:
478
494
12.
Mammano
F
,
Nobili
R
(
1993
)
Biophysics of the cochlea: Linear approximation
.
J Acoust Soc Am
93
(
6
):
3320
3332
13.
Nobili
R
,
Mammano
F.
(
1996
)
Biophysics of the cochlea. II: Stationary nonlinear phenomenology
.
J Acoust Soc Am
99
(
4
):
2244
2255
14.
Epp
B
,
Verhey
JL
,
Mauermann
,
M
(
2010
)
Modeling cochlear dynamics: Interrelation between cochlea mechanics and psychoacoustics
.
J Acoust Soc Am
128
(
4
):
1870
1883
15.
Talmadge
CL
,
Tubis
A
,
Long
GR
,
Piskorski
P
(
1998
)
Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures
.
J Acoust Soc Am
104
(
3
):
1517
1543
16.
Puria
S
(
2003
)
Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: Implications for otoacoustic emissions
.
113
(
5
),
2773
2789
17.
Kemp
DT
,
Chum
RA
(
1980
) Observations on the generator mechanism of stimulus frequency acoustic emissions Two tone suppression. In
Psychophysical Physiological and Behavioural Studies in Hearing
, edited by
G.V.D.
Brink
and
F.A.
Bilsen
,
Delft University Press
,
Delft
, pp.
34
42
18.
Kalluri
R
,
Shera
CA
(
2007
)
Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing
.
J Acoust Soc Am
122
(
6
):
3562
3575
.
19.
Cleveland
WS
(
1993
)
Visualizing Data
.
Hobart
,
Summit, NJ
This content is only available via PDF.