Representative defect standards are essential for the validation and calibration of new and existing inspection techniques. However, commonly used methods of simulating delaminations in carbon-fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites do not accurately represent the behavior of the real-world defects for several widely-used NDE techniques. For instance, it is common practice to create a delamination standard by inserting Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in between ply layers. However, PTFE can transmit more ultrasonic energy than actual delaminations, leading to an unrealistic representation of the defect inspection. PTFE can also deform/wrinkle during the curing process and has a thermal effusivity two orders of magnitude higher than air (almost equal to that of a CFRP). It is therefore not effective in simulating a delamination for thermography. Currently there is also no standard practice for producing or representing a known porosity in composites. This paper presents a novel method of creating delamination and porosity standards using aerogel. Insertion of thin sheets of solid aerogel between ply layers during layup is shown to produce air-gap-like delaminations creating realistic ultrasonic and thermographic inspection responses. Furthermore, it is shown that depositing controlled amounts of aerogel powder can represent porosity. Micrograph data verifies the structural integrity of the aerogel through the composite curing process. This paper presents data from multiple NDE methods, including X-ray computed tomography, immersion ultrasound, and flash thermography to the effectiveness of aerogel as a delamination and porosity simulant.

1.
R.
Rrakash
, “
Non-destructive Testing of Composites
,”
Composites
,
11
:
4
, pp
217
224
, ISSN , (
1980
) .
2.
W.N
Reynolds
, “
Nondestructive testing (NDT) of fibre-reinforced composite materials
,”
Materials & Design
,
5
,
6
, pp.
256
270
(
1984
)ISSN , .
3.
R.D.
Adams
,
P.
Cawley
, “
A review of defect types and nondestructive testing techniques for composites and bonded joints
,”
NDT International
,
21
,
4
, pp.
208
222
, ISSN , (
1988
).
4.
Smith
,
R. A.
Composite defects and their detection
.”
Materials science and engineering
3
:
103
143
, (
2009
).
5.
Daniel
,
Isaac
M.
,
Ishai
,
O.
“Engineering mechanics of composite materials.”
3
. p.
277
.
New York
:
Oxford university press
, (
1994
).
6.
Le Cahain
,
Y. M.
,
Noden
,
J.
, and
Hallett
,
S. R.
Effect of insert material on artificial delamination performance in composite laminates
.”
Journal of Composite Materials
,
49
(
21
),
2589
2597
, (
2015
).
7.
Castellini
,
P.
and
F.
Cannella
. “Experimental model of a delamination within a composite panel: A numerical study.”
Universita Politencnica delle Marche
,
Italy
, (
2005
).
8.
Waddell
,
Michael
C.
Comparison of Artificial Delamination Methods for use with Nondestructive Testing
.” (
2013
).
9.
Sundaravalli
,
S.
,
M. C.
Majumder
, and
G. K.
Vijayaraghavan
. “
Numerical Analysis of Defects in FML using Through-Transmission Mode of Active Thermography
.”
Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology
,
3.3
:
437
447
, (
2012
).
10.
Saad
,
Messiha
T.
,
Sandi G.
Miller
, and
Torrence
Marunda
. “
Thermal Characterization of IM7/8552-1 Carbon-Epoxy Composites
.”
ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition
.
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
,
8B
(
Heat Transfer and Thermal Engineering
),
8
pp., (
2014
).
12.
Adams
,
R. D.
, and
P. D. R. D.
Cawley
. “
A review of defect types and nondestructive testing techniques for composites and bonded joints
.”
NDT International
,
21
.
4
208
222
, (
1988
).
13.
Aerogel.org, “
What is Aerogel?
Aerogel.org. (
2017
). http://www.aerogel.org/?p=3
14.
Birt
,
E. A.
, and
R. A.
Smith
. “
A review of NDE methods for porosity measurement in fibre-reinforced polymer composites
.”
Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring
46
.
11681
686
, (
2004
).
15.
Mayr
,
G.
,
Hendorfer
,
G.
,
Plank
,
B.
,
Sekelja
,
J.
Active thermography as a quantitative method for non-destructive evaluation of porous carbon fiber reinforced polymers
.”
NDT & E International
,
44
.
7
:
537
543
, (
2011
).
16.
Kastner
,
J.
,
Plank
,
B.
,
Salaberger
,
D.
,
Sekelja
,
J.
Defect and porosity determination of fibre reinforced polymers by X-ray computed tomography
.”
2nd International Symposium on NDT in Aerospace
. pp
1
12
, (
2010
).
This content is only available via PDF.