This study presents a modified friction ratio range for soil classification i.e. gravel, sand, silt & clay and peat, using CPT data in Western Central Java. The CPT data was obtained solely from Soil Mechanic Laboratory of Jenderal Soedirman University that covers more than 300 sites within the study area. About 197 data were produced from data filtering process. IDW method was employed to interpolated friction ratio values in a regular grid point for soil classification map generation. Soil classification map was generated and presented using QGIS software. In addition, soil classification map with respect to modified friction ratio range was validated using 10% of total measurements. The result shows that silt and clay dominate soil type in the study area, which is in agreement with two popular methods namely Begemann and Vos. However, the modified friction ratio range produces 85% similarity with laboratory measurements whereby Begemann and Vos method yields 70% similarity. In addition, modified friction ratio range can effectively distinguish fine and coarse grains, thus useful for soil classification and subsequently for landslide analysis. Therefore, modified friction ratio range proposed in this study can be used to identify soil type for mountainous tropical region.

1.
H. Z.
Abidin
,
H.
Andreas
,
M. Gamal
,
Surono
and
M.
Hendrasto
,
J. Eng. Tech. Sci.
36
(
2
),
109
123
(
2004
).
2.
A.
Verruijt
,
Soil mechanics
(
Delft
:
Delft University of Technology
,
2001
).
3.
A. O.
Mohamed
and
O. A.
El Fatih
,
J. Build. Road Res.
5
(August),
37
46
(
2003
).
4.
S. S.
De Dalal
and
R. B.
Sahu
,
Indian Geotech. J.
41
(
4
),
206
214
(
2011
).
5.
A. A.
Shahri
,
A.
Malehmir
and
C.
Juhlin
,
Eng. Geology
189
,
32
47
(
2015
).
6.
H. K. S.
Begemann
, ‘
The friction jacket cone as an aid in determining the soil profile
.’, in
6th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering
. (
Montreal
,
1965
), pp.
17
20
.
7.
B. J.
Douglas
and
R. S.
Olsen
Soil classification using electric cone penetrometer
’, in
Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing and Experience, Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE. St. Louis, Missouri
, (
Missouri
,
1981
), pp.
209
227
.
8.
J. D.
Vos
, ‘
The Pratical Use of CPT in soil Profiling
’, in
The Second European Symposium on Penetration Testing, EOSPT-2
. (
Amsterdam
,
1982
), pp.
933
939
.
9.
P. K.
Robertson
,
Canadian Geotech. J.
27
(
1
),
151
158
(
1990
).
10.
B. H.
Fellenius
and
A.
Eslami
, ‘
Soil Profile Interpreted from CPTu Data
’, in
Geotechnical Engineering Conference
,
November 27 - 30, 2000
. (
Bangkok
,
2000
), pp.
1
19
.
11.
R.
Schimmer
, ‘
A remote sensing and GIS method for detecting land surface areas covered y copper mill tailings
’, in
Pecora 17 - The Future of Land Imaging Going Operational
. (
Denver, Colorado
,
2008
), pp.
1
13
.
12.
S.
Maryati
,
H.
Shimada
,
T.
Sasaoka
,
A.
Hamanaka
,
K.
Matsui
and
H.
Nagawa
,
J. Geographic Inf. Sys.
4
(
1
),
62
70
(
2012
).
13.
S. M.
Ahmadi
,
A.
Jafarirad
and
N.
Nezafati
,
J. Geographic Inf. Sys.
,
7
(December),
677
691
(
2015
).
14.
D.
Shepard
, ‘
A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly space data
’, in
Proceedings of the 23rd National Conference ACM
, (
1968
), p.
1968
.
15.
Yanto
,
B. Livneh
and
B.
Rajagopalan
,
Sci. Data
,
4
,
170072
(
2017
).
This content is only available via PDF.