Current methodologies in designing robotic exoskeletons for upper limb therapy simplify the complex requirements of the human anatomy. As a result, such devices tend to compromise safety and biocompatibility with the intended user. However, a new design methodology uses biological analogues as inspiration to address these technical issues. This approach follows that of biomimetics, a design principle that uses the extraction and transfer of useful information from natural morphologies and processes to solve technical design issues. In this study, a biomimetic approach in the design of a 5-degree-of-freedom robotic exoskeleton for upper limb therapy was performed. A review of biomimetics was first discussed along with its current contribution to the design of rehabilitation robots. With a proposed methodological framework, the design for an upper limb robotic exoskeleton was generated using CATIA software. The design was inspired by the morphology of the bones and the muscle force transmission of the upper limbs. Finally, a full design assembly presented had integrated features extracted from the biological analogue. The successful execution of a biomimetic design methodology made a case in providing safer and more biocompatible robots for rehabilitation.

1.
W.H.
Chang
and
Y.H.
Kim
,
J Stroke
,
174
181
(
2013
)
2.
A.
Frisoli
,
C.
Procopio
,
C.
Chisari
,
I.
Creatini
,
L.
Bonfiglio
,
M.
Bergamasco
,
B.
Rossi
and M.C.
J NeuroEngineering Rehabil
9
(
36
) (
2012
).
3.
N.
Yozbatiran
,
J.
Berliner
,
M.K.
O’Malley
,
A.U.
Pehlivan
,
Z.
Kadivar
,
C.
Boake
and
G.E.
Francisco
,
J Rehabil Med.
44
,
186
188
(
2012
).
4.
R.
Bogue
,
Industrial Robot
,
421
427
(
2009
).
5.
Z.
Xu
and
E.
Todorov
,
IEEE ICRA
(
2016
).
6.
R.
Gopura
and
K.
Kiguchi
,
IEEE ICRR
(
2011
).
7.
J.M.
Beynus
.
Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature
(NY:
Harper Perennial
,
New York
,
2002
).
8.
Y.
Bar-Cohen
,
Biomimetics – using nature to inspire human innovation
(
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
,
2006
), pp.
1
12
.
9.
H.
Cheong
,
G.
Hallihan
and
L.H.
Shu
,
Design Computing and Cognition’
12
,
21
39
(
2014
).
10.
J.
Sartori
,
U.
Pal
and
A.
Chakrabarti
,
AI EDAM
24
(Special Issue
04
),
483
506
(
2010
).
11.
V.
Vakili
and
L.H.
Shu
, “
Towards biomimetic concept generation
” in the
ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences DTM, Proceedings of DETC’01
(
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
,
2001
).
12.
E.C.
Martinez-Villalpando
,
J.
Weber
,
G.
Elliot
and
H.
Herr
,
IMECE2008-67705
(
2008
).
13.
J.
Klein
,
S.J.
Spencer
,
J.
Allington
,
K.
Minakata
,
E.T.
Wolbrecht
,
R.
Smith
,
J.E.
Bobrow
and
D.J.
Reinkensmeyer
, “
Biomimetic orthosis for the neurorehabilitation of the elbow and shoulder (BONES
)” in the
2nd Biennial IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Conference Proceedings
, (
Scottsdale, AZ, USA
,
2008
)
14.
A.B.W.
Miranda
,
A.Y.
Yasutomi
,
C.
Souit
and
A.
Forner-Cordero
, “
Bioinspired mechanical design of an upper limb exoskeleton for rehabilitation and motor control assessment
” in the
4th IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, Conference Proceedings
. (
Rome, Italy
,
2012
).
15.
J.Y.
Rho
,
L.
Kuhn-Spearing
and
P.
Ziopous
,
Medical Engineering and Physics
20
,
92
102
(
1998
).
16.
S.N.
Roderick
and
C.R.
Carignan
, “
An approach to designing software safety systems for rehabilitation robots
” the
2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Conference Proceedings
. (
Chicago, IL, USA
,
2005
)
This content is only available via PDF.