There are some mechanism to commercialize the innovations that have been developed by academic scientists in universities, i.e. patenting, licensing, start-up creation, and university–industry partnerships. The start-up creations or university spin-offs (USOs) company is a very special start-up company that is founded by an academic inventor and the university with the aim to commercialize the technological innovation that created by the university. However, it is not always as smooth as expected. The market competitiveness of the USOs obviously has many challenges to be able to compete with the existing companies, analysis need to be done to get the right business step so the business strategy will be efficient. In this article, we discuss a real case study of a university spin-off that owned by Sebelas Maret University for Commercializing Battery Lithium. The aim of our research is twofold: first, to identify the gap in the literature of business strategy formulation between a conventional and USOs. Second, to propose a business strategy formulation for commercializing university-created technology, i.e. battery lithium as core business of a university spin-off as a case study. We conduct surveys, observation and FGD in order to collect the data and information to build the company objective and goals. The analytical tools to generate the solution of business strategy are SWOT analysis, IFE-EFE matrix, and QSPM model so the result will be the most attractive and suitable for the company. The result shows that the case study of USO company is classified on conservative continuous improvement phase so the suitable strategy for this company are product development and business strategy integration.

1.
Bulsara
H.P.
,
Gandhi
S.
,
Porey
P.D.
Techno-innovation to Techno – Entrepreneurship through Technology Business Incubation in India: An Exploratory Study
.
Asia Pacific Journal of Innovations and Entrepreneurship, Asian Association of Business Incubation
Vol
3
Issue i1
55
77
.
2.
Walker
K.
2012.
The Technopreneurship Process: Academic Entrepreneur University Spin-offs
.
RIThink
2012
Volume
2
11
22
.
3.
Albahari
A.
,
Pérez-Canto
S.. Barge-Gil.
,
Modrego
A.
2017.
Technology Parks versus Science Parks: Does the university make the difference?
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Volume
116
, March
2017
, Pages
13
28
.
4.
Narasimhalu
A.D.
2015.
Building Effective Bridges between Science Parks and Universities
.
World Technopolis Review
2015
4
2
10
.
5.
Okorie
N.N.
,
Kwa
D.Y.
,
Olusunle
S.O.O.
,
Akinyami
A.O.
,
Momoh
I.M.
2014.
Technopreneurship : An Urgent Need In The Material World for Sustainability in Nigeria
.
European Scientific Journal
October
2014
edition vol.
10
, No.
30
.
6.
Davenport
S.
,
Carr
A.
,
Bibby
D.
2002.
Leveraging talent: spin-off strategy at Industrial Research
.
RnD Management
Volume
32
, Issue
3
June
2002
Pages
241
254
.
7.
Pratiwi
A.
,
Sutopo
W.
,
Zakaria
R.
,
Rasli
A.
2016.
Formulating Strategy Through QSPM Based on SWOT Framework: A Case Study Spin-Off Company in Malaysia
.
Abasyn Journal of Social Sciences – Special Issue: AIC
2016
212
222
.
8.
Perez
M.P.
,
Sanchez
A.M.
2003.
The development of university spin-offs: early dynamics of technology transfer and networking
.
Technovation
23
(
2003
)
823
831
.
9.
Link
,
A. N.
, &
Scott
,
J. T.
2005
.
Opening the ivory tower’s door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of U.S. university spin-off companies
.
Research Policy
,
34
,
7
,
1106
1112
.
10.
Sutopo
W.
,
Astuti R.W.
,
Yuniaristanto
.
2017
.
The Schemes Funding Analysis for Technology Commercialization: A Case Study
.
Jurnal Metris
18
(
2017
)
7
16
.
11.
Sørheim
R.
,
Widding
L.O.
,
Oust
M.
,
Madsen
O.
2010
.
Funding of University Spin-Off Companies: A Conceptual Approach to Financing Challenges
.
Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development
April 2010.
12.
Benneworth
P.
,
Charles
D.
2005.
University spin-off policies and economic development in Less successful regions: Learning from two decades of policy practice
.
Journal European Planning Studies
Vol.
13
2005
Issue
4
: Regional Innovation Policy.
13.
Sternberg
R.
2013.
Success factors of university-spin-offs: Regional government support programs versus regional environment
.
Technovation
34
(
2014
)
137
148
.
14.
Astuti
R.W.
Proposal of Science and Technology Parks Sebelas Maret University : Development of Li-Ion Battery based on LiFePO4 Nanopartikel for Nation Energy Sustainability
(
2015
).
15.
Kusuma
C.
,
Sutopo W.
,
Yuniaristanto
,
Hadiyono
S.
,
Nizam
M.
2015.
Incubation Scheme of the University Spin Off to Commercialize the Invention in Sebelas Maret University
.
Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists
2015
Vol
II
.
16.
Atikah
N.
,
Al Ghabid
A.H.
,
Sutopo
W.
,
Purwanto
A.
,
Nizam
M.
2014
.
Technical Feasibility for Technology Commercialization of Battery Lithium Ion
.
2014 IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
308
314
.
17.
Pazos
D.R.
,
López
S.F.
,
González
L.O.
,
Sandiás
A.R.
2011
.
A resource-based view of university spin-off activity: New evidence from the Spanish case
.
Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa
21
(
2012
)
255
265
.
18.
Bigliardi
B.
,
Galati
F.
,
Verbano
C.
2013.
Evaluating Performance of University Spin-Off Companies: Lessons from Italy
.
J. Technol. Manag. Innov.
2013
, Volume
8
, Issue
2
178
188
.
19.
Saghaei
M.
,
Fazayeli
L.
,
Shojaee
M.R.
2012
.
Strategic Planning for a Lubricant Manufacturing Company
.
Australian Journal of Business and Management Research
Vol.
1
No.
10
18
24
.
20.
Setyorini
H.
,
Effendi
M.
,
Santoso
I.
2016
.
Marketing Strategy Analysis Using SWOT Matrix and QSPM (Case Study: WS Restaurant Soekarno Hatta Malang
).
Industria: Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Agroindustri
Volume
5
Nomor
1
:
46
53
.
21.
David
M.E.
,
David
Fred R.
, &
David
Forest R.
2016
.
The quantitative strategic planning matrix: a new marketing tool
,
Journal of Strategic Marketing.
22.
David
F.R
2013
.
Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases.
14th Ed.
New Jersey
:
Pearson
.
23.
Lee
E.
,
Staelin
R.
2014
.
Vertical Strategic Interaction: Implications for Channel Pricing Strategy
.
Marketing Science/
Vol.
16
, No.
3
, 1997 pp
185
207
.
24.
Mohr
J.
,
Nevin
J.R.
1990.
Communication Strategies in Marketing Channels: A Theoretical Perspective
.
Journal of Marketing
, October
1990
:
36
51
.
25.
Soosay
C.A.
,
Hyland
P.W.
,
Ferrer
M.
2008.
Supply chain collaboration: capabilities for continuous innovation
.
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
13/
2
(
2008
)
160
169
.
This content is only available via PDF.