This study investigated the mechanism of how POFA mitigated the ASR expansion. Two types of POFA; the UPOFA and GPOFA with different fineness were used to replace the cement at 20% and 40% and their effects on the mortar bar expansion, calcium hydroxide, alkali dilution, and calcium concentration were investigated. The results showed that UPOFA has a significant ability to mitigate the ASR, even at a lower level of replacement (20%) compared to GPOFA. The mechanism of UPOFA in mitigating the ASR expansion was through a reduction in the calcium hydroxide content, which produced low calcium concentration within the mortar pore solution. Low pore solution alkalinity signified that UPOFA had good alkali dilution effect. Meanwhile, a higher dosage of GPOFA was required to mitigate the ASR expansion. An increase in the pore solution alkalinity of GPOFA mortar indicated higher penetration of alkalis from the NaOH solution, which reduced the alkali dilution effect. However, this was compensated by the increase in the cement dilution effect at higher GPOFA replacement, which controlled the mortar bar expansion below the ASTM limit.

1.
M.
Kawamura
and
K.
Iwahori
,
Cement and Concrete Composites
26
,
47
56
(
2004
).
2.
A. S. M. A.
Awal
and
M. W.
Hussin
,
Cement and Concrete Composites
19
,
367
372
(
1997
).
3.
H.
Asrah
,
A. K.
Mirasa
and
A.
Mannan
,
International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
2
,
60
66
(
2015
).
4.
J.
Lindgård
,
Ö.
Andiç-çak
,
I.
Fernandes
,
T. F.
Rønning
and
M. D. A.
Thomas
,
Cement and Concrete Research
42
,
223
243
(
2012
).
5.
H.
Du
and
K. H.
Tan
,
Cement and Concrete Composites
35
,
118
126
(
2013
).
6.
J.
Duchesne
and
M. A.
Berube
,
Advanced Cement Based Materials
2
,
43
52
(
1995
).
7.
J. A. D.
Ujil
and
N.
Kaptijn
,
Heron
47
,
125
139
(
2002
).
8.
T.
Ayub
,
N.
Shafiq
and
S. U.
Khan
,
International Journal of Civil, Architectural Science and Engineering
7
,
273
284
(
2013
).
9.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
,
ASTM C1260-14: Standard test method for potential alkali reactivity of aggregates (Mortar-Bar method)
,
ASTM
,
Pennsylvania
,
2014
.
10.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
,
ASTM C109/109M-16a: Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2-in. or [50-mm] cube specimens)
,
ASTM
,
Pennsylvania
,
2016
.
11.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
,
ASTM C1567-13: Standard test method for determining the potential alkali-silica reactivity of combinations of cementitious materials and aggregate (accelerated Mortar-Bar method)
,
ASTM
,
Pennsylvania
,
2013
.
12.
M. A.
Bérubé
,
J.
Duchesne
,
J. F.
Dorion
and
M.
Rivest
,
Cement and Concrete Research
32
,
1215
1227
(
2002
).
13.
H.
Asrah
,
A. K.
Mirasa
,
N.
Bolong
,
A.
Mannan
and
M.
Madi
,
Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences
12
,
4820
4825
(
2017
).
14.
K.
Afshinnia
and
P. R.
Rangaraju
,
Construction and Building Materials
81
,
257
267
(
2015
).
15.
H.
Wang
and
J. E.
Gillott
,
Cement and Concrete Research
21
,
647
654
(
1991
).
16.
S.
Kandasamy
and
M. H.
Shehata
,
Cement and Concrete Composites
49
,
92
99
(
2014
).
17.
F.
Bektas
and
K.
Wang
,
Cement and Concrete Composites
34
,
273
278
(
2012
).
18.
T.
Ichikawa
and
M.
Miura
,
Cement and Concrete Research
37
,
1291
1297
(
2007
).
19.
W.
Tangchirapat
,
S.
Khamklai
and
C.
Jaturapitakkul
,
Materials and Design
41
,
150
157
(
2012
).
This content is only available via PDF.