Students need to be equipped with the 21st century skills/capabilities to ensure their competitiveness in the knowledge era. So, it is imperative that education at school should be changed in order to fulfill the need. However, there is not any specified approach on how to educate young students for the 21st century capabilities. Regardless the impediment for ts exist, we need to construct an innovative instruction that can develop the students’ 21st century skills by incorporating the skills needed, based on contemporary theory of learning, necessary context of learning and appropriate assessment in a chemistry subject matter. This paper discuss the feasible skills to be promoted through chemistry course. Those skills/capabilities are scientific literacy, higher order thinking, communicationand collaboration and curiosity. The promoted are called the 21st century scientific literacy skills in which it emphasis on scientific literacy and embedded the other 21st century skills into the innovative chemistry instruction. The elements involve in the instruction such as inquiry and constructivist approach, nature of science, contemporary/socioscientific issues, critical thinking (higher order thinking).

1.
World Economic Forum, New Vision for Education Unlocking the Potential of Technology
. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_NewVisionforEducation_Report2015.pdf (Retrived 1st August 2017) (
2015
).
2.
Metiri Group and NCRE
,
EnGauge 21st Century Skills: Literacy in the Digital Age
(
North Central Regional Educational Laboratory
,
Chicago
,
2003
).
3.
P. L.
Peterson
,
E.
Fennema
,
T. P.
Carpenter
, and
M.
Loef
,
Cogn. & Inst.
6
,
1
40
(
1989
).
4.
V.
Boix-Mansilla
and
A.
Jackson
,
Educating for Global Competence: Preparing our Youth to Engage in the World
(
The Asia Society
,
New York
,
2005
)
5.
A.
Schleicher
,
Preparing Teachers and Developing School Leaders for the 21st Century: Lessons from Around the World
.
OECD Publishing
.
10.1787/9789264xxxxxx-en
Retrieved 02/17-12 (
2012
).
6.
N. G.
Lederman
,
Sci.& Chil.
,
Nature of science and its fundamental important to the vision of the next generation science standars
. pp.
8
10
(
2014
).
7.
H.
Fives
,
W.
Huebner
,
A. S.
Birnbaum
, and
M.
Nicoloch
.
Sci. Edu.
98
,
549
580
(
2014
).
8.
W. M.
Roth
and
S.
Lee
,
Sci. Edu, Science.
88
,
263
291
(
2004
).
9.
A.
Hofstein
,
I.
Eilks
, and
R.
Bybee
,
Intl. Jou. of Sci. and Math. Edu.
9
,
1459
1483
(
2011
).
10.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
.
OECD Database.
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
. Retrieved August 1, 2017. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/(2009).
11.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)
. “PISA 2015 Science Framework”, in
PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework:Science, Reading, Mathematics and Financial Literacy
, (
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2016
).
12.
J.
Holbrook
and
M.
Rannikmae
,
Int. J. Env.& Sci. Ed.
4
,
275
288
(
2009
)
13.
National Science Teachers Association
,
Science-technology-society: Science education for the 1980s
(
An NSTA position statement
)(Author,
Washington, DC
,
1982
).
14.
R.
Driver
,
J.
Leach
,
R.
Millar
, and
P.
Scott
,
Young peoples’s images of science
. (
Open University Press Buckingham
,
UK
,
1996
)
15.
N. G.
Lederman
, “Syntax of Nature of Science within Inquiry and Science Instruction” in
Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science
, edited by
B.
Flick
and
N.G.
Lederman
(
Springer
,
Dordrecht, Netherlands
,
2006
), pp.
301
317
.
16.
D.
Hodson
, Nature of Science in the Science Curriculum: Origin, Development, Implications and Shifting Emphasis.
Dalam Mattews
,
M.R
(Eds).
International Handbook of Research in History, Phylosiphy and Science Teaching
. (
Springer
,
New York
,
2014
), pp.
911
970
.
17.
N. G.
Lederman
, “Nature of science: Past, present, and future” in
handbook of research in science education
, edited by
S.K.
Abell
and
N.G.
Lederman
(
Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers
,
Mahwah, New Jersey
,
2007
), pp.
831
879
.
18.
F.
Abd-El-Khalick
and
S.
BouJaoude
.
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
34
,
673
699
(
1997
).
19.
N. G.
Lederman
,
F.
Abd-El-Khalick
,
R. L.
Bell
, and
R. S.
Schwartz
,
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
39
,
497
521
(
2002
).
20.
J.
Osborne
,
S.
Collins
,
M.
Ratcliffe
,
R.
Millar
, and
R.
Duschl
,
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
40
,
692
720
(
2003
).
21.
F.
Abd-El-Khalick
and
N. G.
Lederman
,
Int. J. Sci. Edu.
22
,
665
701
(
2001
).
22.
R.
Khishfe
,
J. Res. Sci.
49
,
489
514
(
2012
).
23.
T.
Sadler
,
Sci. Edu.
13
,
39
48
(
2004
).
24.
C.
Redecker
,
K.
Ala-Mutka
,
M.
Leis
,
M.
Leendertse
,
Y.
Punie
,
G.
Gijsbers
,
P.
Kirschner
,
S.
Stoyanov
, and
B.
Hoogveld
,
The Future of Learning: Preparing for Change
.
Luxembourg
,
Publications Office of the European Union
. http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC66836.pdf (Accessed 5 April 2014), (
2011
).
25.
Trilling
,
B.
and
Fadel
,
C.
(
2009
). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times.
San Francisco, Calif.
,
Jossey-Bass/ John Wiley & Sons, Inc
. https://yasamboyuogrenme. wikispaces.com/file/view/21st+CENTURY+SKILLS.pdf (Accessed 20 May 2014) (2006).
26.
R. H.
Ennis
,
Critical thinking: What is it?
edited by
H. A.
Alexander
,
Philosophy of Education Society
,
Urbana IL
,
1993
), pp.
76
80
.
27.
P. A.
Facione
,
Critical thinking: What is it and why it count
(
California Academic Press
,
Millbrae, CA
,
2013
).
28.
R. J.
Marzano
,
D.
Pickering
, and
J.
McTighe
,
Assessing student outcomes: Performance assessment using the dimensions of learning model
(
ASCD
,
Alexandria
,
1993
).
29.
S. M.
Brookhart
,
How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom
(
ASCD
,
Alexandria USA
,
2010
).
30.
R. W.
Bybee
,
The Teaching of Science: 21st-Century Perspectives
(
NSTA press
,
Arlington Virginia
,
2010
).
31.
P. J.
Silvia
,
Exploring the psychology of interest
.
New York, USA
:
Oxford university Press, New York
,
2006
)
32.
D. L.
Zeidler
and
B. H.
Nichols
,
J. E. Sci. Ed.
21
,
49
58
(
2009
).
This content is only available via PDF.