The inadequate facilities and limited access to public transport reflect many people using private vehicles, in particular, motorcycle. The motorcycle is most widely used in Indonesia, recently, including Aceh Province. As a result, the number of motorcycle ownership is increasing significantly. The increasing number of motorcycles leads to complex traffic problems. Several factors tend to affect the trip generation of the motorcyclist, i.e., the social demographics of individuals and families, accessibility, etc. This study aims to analyze the characteristics of motorcyclists for non-mandatory activities, i.e. activities other than to work and school. It also aims to determine the dominant factors that affect their trips through trip generation models. The required data consist of primary data and secondary data. Primary data consists of a home interview survey that collects individual’s daily trips. It is conducted by distributing the questionnaires to 400 families residing in Lhokseumawe City. Modeling the trip generation of the motorcyclist is done by multiple linear regression analysis. Parameters calibration uses OLS (Ordinary Least Square) method. The results showed that the dominant variables that affect the trip generation of motorcyclist for non-mandatory activities are license ownership, housewife, school-age children, middle-income household, and lower education level. It can be concluded that some factors affecting trip generation to non-work activities were female motorcyclists from the middle-income household with lower education level. As their status is mostly as the housewife, escorting children to non-school activities seems to the mother’s task, instead of the father. It is clear that, most female ride motorcycle for doing household tasks. However, it should be noted that the use of the motorcycle in long-term does not suit for sustainable transportation.

1.
D. A.
Badoe
, and
G. N.
Steuart
,
Transportation Planning and Technology
20
,
267
290
(
1997
).
2.
Koppelman
,
F.S.
, and
Pas
,
E.I.
,
Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory
,
Utrecht, Netherlands
,
1984
, pp.
513
529
.
3.
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
,
Trip Generation Analysis
(
Government Printing Office
,
Washington, D.C
.,
1975
).
4.
M. J.
Bruton
,
Introduction to Transportation Planning
(
Hutchinson
,
London
,
1995
).
5.
E.
Sheppard
, “Modeling and Predicting Aggregate Flows,” in
S.
Hanson
, (ed).
The Geography of Urban Transportation
(
The Guilford Press
,
New York
,
1995
).
6.
H. S.
Levinson
, “Urban Travel Characteristics,” in
J. E.
Baerdwald
, (ed).
Transportation and Traffic Engineering Handbook
, (
Prentice-Hall
,
New Jersey
,
1976
).
7.
R.
Anggraini
,
T. A.
Arentze
, and
H. J. P.
Timmermans
,
Transportation Research Record
2135
,
17
24
(
2009
).
8.
T. A.
Arentze
, and
H. J. P.
Timmermans
,
ALBATROSS, EIRASS
,
2000
.
9.
T. A.
Arentze
, and
H. J. P.
Timmermans
,
ALBATROSS Version 2, EIRASS
,
2005
.
10.
R.
Anggraini
,
T. A.
Arentze
, and
H. J. P.
Timmermans
,
Proceedings the 8th International DDSS Conference, Eindhoven University of Technology
,
2006
.
11.
R.
Anggraini
, “
Household Activity-Travel Behavior: Implementation of Within-Household Interactions
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Eindhoven University of Technology
,
Netherlands
,
2009
.
12.
R.
Anggraini
,
T. A.
Arentze
, and
H. J. P.
Timmermans
,
European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
8
,
301
109
(
2008
).
13.
R.
Anggraini
,
T. A.
Arentze
, and
H. J. P.
Timmermans
,
Transportmetrica
8
(
3
),
209
224
(
2012
).
14.
S.
Sugiarto
,
T.
Miwa
,
T.
Morikawa
,
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
103
:
36
53
(
2017
).
15.
S.
Sugiarto
,
T.
Miwa
,
T.
Morikawa
,
Int. J. Transp. Res
, (
2016
). Available at Online first
16.
S.
Sugiarto
,
T.
Miwa
,
H.
Sato
,
T.
Morikawa
,
Journal of Urban Planning and Development (ASCE)
143
(
2
),
1
12
(
2017
).
This content is only available via PDF.