The use of bulldozer in construction projects determines a vast number of diesel consumption, emissions and the portion of total cost of the project. Construction equipment operators need a method that can be utilized to predict and quantify not only the cost, but also the diesel consumption and emissions of construction projects, particularly for bulldozer’s activities. The main purpose of this paper is to propose an E3, the predicting tool for the economic, energy, and environmental impact of the use of bulldozer. The tool was developed by using the productivity rate model of bulldozer to the US EPA’s NONROAD model. The results show that the bulldozer’s productivity model can be used as the platform for predicting the total cost and diesel consumption that will be required and the total expected emissions for the project.

1.
EPA
,
Emission reduction incentives for off-road diesel equipment used in the port and construction sectors
.
Washington D.C
.:
Office of Transportation and Air Quality
(
2005
).
2.
P.
Lewis
, and
A.
Hajji
,
Comparison of two models for estimating equipment productivity for a sustainability quantification tool
.
Paper presented at the ICSDEC 2012
Developing the Frontier of Sustainable Design, Engineering, and Construction
,
Fort Worth, TX
(
2012
).
3.
B.
Heidari
and
C. M.
Linsey
,
Real-time emissions from construction equipment compared with model predictions
.
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
,
65
(
2
),
115
125
(
2015
).
4.
L.
Devi
,
Pinky
, and
S.
Palaniappan
,
A study on energy use for excavation and transport of soil during building construction
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
164
,
543
556
(
2017
).
5.
X.
Hu
and
C.
Liu
,
Energy productivity and total-factor productivity in the Australian construction industry
.
Architectural Science Review
,
59
(
5
),
432
444
(
2016
).
6.
P.
Lewis
,
H.
Fitriani
, and
I.
Arocho
,
Engine variable impact analysis of diesel consumption and emissions for heavy-duty diesel maintenance equipment
.
Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
,
2482
,
8
15
(
2015
).
7.
W.
Rasdorf
,
P.
Lewis
,
I.
Arocho
, and
J.
Hummer
,
Characterizing air pollutant emissions for highway construction projects
.
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment
,
4
(
3
),
315
328
(
2015
).
8.
S.H.
Jassim
,
Hassanean
,
W.
Lu
, and
T.
Olofsson
,
A practical method for assessing the energy consumption and CO2 emissions of mass haulers
.
Energies
9
(
10
),
802
(
2016
).
9.
S.H.
Jassim
,
Hassanean
,
W.
Lu
, and
T.
Olofsson
,
Predicting Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions of Excavators in Earthwork Operations: An Artificial Neural Network Model
.
Sustainability
9
(
7
),
1257
(
2017
).
10.
J.
Krantz
,
W.
Lu
,
T.
Johansson
, and
T.
Olofsson
,
Analysis of alternative road construction staging approaches to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
Journal of Cleaner Production
143
,
980
988
(
2017
).
11.
P.
Lewis
and
W.
Rasdorf
,
Fuel Use and Pollutant Emissions Taxonomy for Heavy Duty Diesel Construction Equipment
.
Journal of Management in Engineering
,
33
(
2
) (
2017
).
12.
R.C.
Ahn
,
P.
Lewis
,
M.
Golparvar-Fard
, and
S.
Lee
,
Integrated framework for estimating, benchmarking, and monitoring pollutant emissions of construction operations
.
Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
,
139
(
12
) (
2013
).
13.
A.
Hajji
,
Estimating the emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX) and particulate matter (PM) from diesel construction equipment by using the productivity model. World Journal of Science
,
Technology and Sustainable Development
,
10
(
3
),
212
228
(
2013
).
14.
A.
Hajji
,
The use of construction equipment productivity rate model for estimating diesel consumption and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions - Case study: bulldozer, excavator and dump truck
.
International Journal of Sustainable Engineering
,
8
(
2
),
111
121
(
2015
).
15.
RS
Means
,
RSMeans heavy construction cost data
(
RSMeans
,
Kingston, MA
,
2010
)
16.
EPA
,
Exhaust and Crankcase Emission Factors for Nonroad Engine Modeling - Compression Ignition
.
EPA- 420-R-10-018, NR-009d.
US Environmental Protection Agency, Inc.
,
Ann Arbor, MI
(
2010
).
17.
EPA
,
Median Life, Annual Activity, and Load Factor Values for Nonroad Engine Emissions Modeling
.
EPA- 420-R-10-016, NR-005d.
US Environmental Protection Agency, Inc.
,
Ann Arbor, MI
(
2010
).
18.
W.
Rasdorf
,
P.
Lewis
, &
C.
Frey
,
Estimating Productivity Emission Rates and Cost Emission Rates of Diesel Construction Equipment
.
Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Innovation in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction
,
University Park, PA
(
2010
).
This content is only available via PDF.