The purpose of this research is to describe the results of higher order thinking skills in physics (PhysHOTS) measurement including: (1) percentage of PhysHOTS level and (2) percentage of the domination of response in the category of students in each analyzing, evaluating, and creating skill. There were 404 10th grade students in Bantul District as the respondents of this research. The instrument used for measurement was PhysReMChoTHOTS. It was divided into two sets consisting of 44 items and including 8 anchor items stated valid by a Physicist, Physics Education Expert, and Physics Education Measurement Expert. The instrument was fit to PCM. The reliability coefficient of this test is 0.71, while the difficulty index of the items ranges from -0.61 to 0.51. The results of the measurement show that: (1) The percentage of each category of PhysHOTS for the 10th grade students in Bantul District for the very low, low, medium, high, and very high category is 4.75 %, 40.30 %, 33.45 %, 19.50 %, and 2.00 %, respectively; and (2) The order in analyzing skills, starts from the weakest, is attributing, differentiating and organizing. The order in evaluating skills, starts from the weakest, is critiquing and checking. Meanwhile, the order in creating skills, starts from the weakest, is producing, planning, and generating.

1.
Mendikbud
.
Permendikbud RI no. 22 tahun 2016 tentang Standar Proses
.
Jakarta
,
2016
2.
Jensen
,
J. L
, et al. 
Teaching to the Test or Testing to Teach: Exams Requiring Higher Order Thinking Skills Encourage Greater Conceptual Understanding
.
Educational Psychology Review
,
1
24
(
2014
).
3.
Madhuri
G.V.
,
Kantamreddi
,
S.S.N.
, &
Goteti
L.N.S.
Promoting higher order thinking skills using inquiry-based learning
.
European Journal of Engineering Education
37
(
2
),
117
123
(
2013
).
4.
Saido
,
G.M.
, et al. 
Higher Order Thinking Skills Among Secondary School Students in Science Learning
.
The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science
,
3
(
3
)
13
20
(
2015
).
5.
Brookhart
,
M.S.
, &
Nitko
A.J.
Assesment and Garding in Classroom
. (
New Jersey
:
Pearson Education, Inc
.
2008
).
6.
Widhiarso
,
W.
Aplikasi Teori Respon Item untuk Pemodelan Respons Menipu pada Skala Kepribadian
.
Laporan Hasil Penelitian UGM
,
2010
.
7.
Mardapi
,
D.
Pengukuran Penilaian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan
(
Yogyakarta
:
Nuha Medika
,
2012
).
8.
Anderson
,
L.W.
, and
Krathwohl
,
D.R.
A Taxonomy of Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
(
New York
:
Longman
,
2001
).
9.
Hassan
,
S.R.
,
Rosli
,
R.
, &
Zakaria
,
E.
,
The Use of i-Think Map and Questioning to Promote Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Mathematics
.
Creative Education
,
7
,
1069
1078
(
2016
).
10.
Ostini
,
R.
, &
Nering
,
M. L.
Polytomous Item Response Theory Models
. (
New Delhi
:
Sage Publications
,
2006
).
11.
Hambleton
,
R.K.
&
Swaminathan
,
H.
Item Respoonse Theory
. (
Boston, MA
:
Kluwer Inc.
,
1985
).
12.
Sumintono
,
B.
, &
Widhiarso
,
W.
Rasch Model MetodePengukuranModern Dalam Ilmu-Ilmu Social
. (
Cimahi
:
Trim Komunikata publishing House
,
2009
).
13.
Ramos
,
J.L.S.
,
Dolipas
,
B.B.
, &
Villamor
,
B.B.
Higher Order Thinking Skills and Academic Performance in Physics of College Students: A Regression Analysis
.
International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research
,
48
60
(
2013
).
14.
Brookhart
,
S. M.
How to Assess Higher Order Thinking Skills in Your Classroom
(
Alexandria
:
ASCD
,
2010
).
15.
Schraw
,
G
, and
Robinson
,
D.H.
,
Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills
. (
New York
:
Information Age Publishing, Inc.
,
2011
).
16.
Adams
,
R. J.
&
Khoo
,
S. T.
,
Quest: The interactive test analysis system version 2.1
. (
Victoria
:
The Australian Council for Educational Reearch
,
1996
).
This content is only available via PDF.