The present study investigates Indonesian fourth-graders low performance in dealing with fractions in TIMSS 2015. Furthermore, the present study also explores possible reasons for this low performance. The data for this study was drawn from TIMSS 2015 data which included test results and responses to Teacher Questionnaire. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data. Indonesian textbooks were also analyzed to portrait a broader scope of possible reasons for students’ low performance. The analysis of TIMSS test result reveals that Indonesian students, in comparison to students from other countries, had low understanding of the basic concepts of fractions. From the Teacher Questionnaire it was found that a possible reason for this low understanding was the Indonesian curriculum for third grade which gave low emphasis on the basic concepts of fractions and introduced operations of fractions rather early. Furthermore, the result of textbook analysis shows that Indonesian textbooks restricted only to one definition of fractions, i.e. fractions as parts of wholes. This finding might also explain Indonesian fourth graders’ low understanding of fractions.

1.
I. V. S.
Mullis
and
M. O.
Martin
, Editors, “TIMSS 2015 Assessment Framework”,
TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center
,
Chestnut Hill
, (
2013
).
2.
J. A.
Van de Walle
,
K. S.
Karp
, and
J. M.
Bay-Williams
, “Elementary and Middle School Mathematics. Teaching developmentally”,
Pearson, New Jersey
, (
2013
).
3.
IEA
, “TIMSS 2011 User Guide for the International Database. Released Items. Mathematics – Fourth Grade”,
TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center
,
Chestnut Hill
, (
2013
).
4.
T.
Husén
, Editor, “
International Study of Achievement in Mathematics: A Comparison of Twelve Countries (Vol. II)
”,
John Wiley & Sons
,
New York
, (
1967
).
5.
Herman
,
J. L.
,
Klein
,
D. C. D.
, &
Abedi
,
J.
(
2000
).
Assessing students’ opportunity to learn: Teacher and student perspectives
.
Educational Measurement: Issue and Practice
,
19
(
4
),
16
24
.
6.
McDonnell
,
L. M.
(
1995
).
Opportunity to learn as a research concept and a policy instrument
.
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
,
17
(
3
),
305
322
.
7.
D. J.
Brewer
and
C.
Stacz
, “
Enhancing Opportunity to Learn Measures in NCES Data
,
CA
:
RAND, Santa Monica
, (
1996
).
8.
G. A.
Valverde
,
L. J.
Bianchi
,
R. G.
Wolfe
,
W. H.
Schmid
, and
R. T.
Houang
, “According to the Book. Using TIMSS to Investigate the Translation of Policy into Practice through the World of Textbooks”,
Kluwer Academic Publishers
,
Dordrecht
, (
2002
).
9.
J.
Tornroos
, “
Mathematics Textbooks, Opportunity to Learn and Student Achievement
”,
Studies in Educational Evaluation
, vol.
31
, vol. 4, (
2005
), pp.
315
327
.
10.
Y. P.
Xin
, “
Word Problem Solving Tasks in Textbooks and Their Relation to Student Performance
”,
Journal of Educational Research
, vol.
100
, no.
6
, (
2007
), pp.
347
359
.
11.
A.
Wijaya
,
M.
Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen
, and
M.
Doorman
, “
Opportunity-to-Learn Context-based Tasks Provided by Mathematics Textbooks
”,
Educational Studies in Mathematics
, vol.
89
, no.
1
, (
2015
), pp.
41
65
.
12.
D. M.
Clarke
,
A.
Roche
, and
A.
Mitchell
, “
Ten Practical Tips for Making Fractions Come Alive and Make Sense
”,
Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School
, vol.
13
, no.
7
, (
2008
), pp.
373
380
This content is only available via PDF.