Resilient modulus characteristics of peat soil are generally very low with high potential of deformation and low bearing capacity. The efforts to improve the peat subgrade resilient modulus characteristics is required, one among them is by adding the geopolymer additive. Geopolymer was made as an alternative to replace portland cement binder in the concrete mix in order to promote environmentally friendly, low shrinkage value, low creep value, and fire resistant material. The use of geopolymer to improve the mechanical properties of peat as a road construction subgrade, hence it becomes important to identify the effect of geopolymer addition on the resilient modulus characteristics of peat soil. This study investigated the addition of 0% - 20% geopolymer content on peat soil derived from Ogan Komering Ilir, South Sumatera Province. Resilient modulus measurement was performed by using cyclic triaxial test to determine the resilience modulus model as a function of deviator stresses and radial stresses. The test results showed that an increase in radial stresses did not necessarily lead to an increase in modulus resilient, and on the contrary, an increase in deviator stresses led to a decrease in modulus resilient. The addition of geopolymer in peat soil provided an insignificant effect on the increase of resilient modulus value.

1.
M. G.
Palomo
, (
1999
).
Alkali-activated fly ashes A cement for the future
.
Cement and Concrete Research
,
1323
1329
.
2.
S. G. Nuno
Cristelo
, (
2012
).
Soil stabilisation using alkaline activation of fly ash for self-compacting rammed earth construction
.
Construction Building and Materials
,
727
735
.
3.
M.
Ahmaruzzaman
, (
2010
).
A review on the utilization of fly ash
.
Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
,
327
363
.
4.
P. N. P.
Sargent
, (
2013
).
The use of alkali activated waste binders in enhancing the mechanical properties and durability of soft alluvial soils
.
Engineering Geology
,
96
108
.
5.
J. S.
Trivedi
,
S.
Nair
,
C.
Iyyunni
, (
2013
).
Optimum Utilization of Fly Ash for Stabilization of Subgrade Soil using Genetic Algorithm
.
Procedia Engineering
,
250
258
.
6.
P. M.
Kolay
,
M.P.
Pui
, (
2010
).
Peat Stabilization using Gypsum and Fly Ash
.
UNIMAS E-Journal of Civil Engineering
,
1
5
.
7.
S.
Boobathiraja
,
P.
Balamurugan
,
M.
Dhansheer
, &
A.
Adhikari
, (
2014
).
Study on Strength of Peat Soil Stabilised with Cement and Other Pozzolanic Materials
.
International Journal of Civil Engineering Research
,
431
438
.
8.
R. B.
Malla
&
S.
Joshi
, (
2007
).
Resilient Modulus Prediction Models Based on nalysis of LTPP Data for Subgrade Soils and Experimental Verification
.
Journal of Transportation Engineering
,
491
504
.
9.
R. F.
Pezo
, (
1993
).
A general method of reporting resilient modulus tests of soils–A pavement engineer’s point of view
.
Washington DC
:
72nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board
.
10.
R. P.
Long
, (
1999
).
Resilient Modulus of Subgrade
.
Connecticut
:
University of Connecticut
.
11.
M.
Pradipta
, (
2015
).
Effect of Mixing Results Selulotik Potential Microorganisms on Strength of Material Land Peat As stockpile
.
Depok
:
Universitas Indonesia
.
12.
PT
Adhimix
. (
2014
).
Jakarta
13.
AASHTO
. (
1993
).
Design of Pavement Structures
.
Washington DC
:
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
.
14.
AASHTO
. (
2003
).
Standard method of test for determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregate materials
. In
A. T307-99, Design of Pavement Structures
.
Washington DC
.
This content is only available via PDF.