CSP power plants have great potential to substantially contribute to world energy supply. To set this free, cost reductions are required for future projects. Heliostat field layout optimization offers a great opportunity to improve field efficiency. Field efficiency primarily depends on the positions of the heliostats around the tower, commonly known as the heliostat field layout. Heliostat shape also influences efficiency. Improvements to optical efficiency results in electricity cost reduction without adding any extra technical complexity. Due to computational challenges heliostat fields are often arranged in patterns. The mathematical models of the radial staggered or spiral patterns are based on two parameters and thus lead to uniform patterns. Optical efficiencies of a heliostat field do not change uniformly with the distance to the tower, they even differ in the northern and southern field. A fixed pattern is not optimal in many parts of the heliostat field, especially when used as large scaled heliostat field. In this paper, two methods are described which allow to modify field density suitable to inconsistent field efficiencies. A new software for large scale heliostat field evaluation is presented, it allows for fast optimizations of several parameters for pattern modification routines. It was used to design a heliostat field with 23,000 heliostats, which is currently planned for a site in South Africa.

1.
E.
Carrizosa
,
C.
Domínguez-Bravo
,
E.
Fernández-Cara
, and
M.
Quero
,
‘A Global Optimization Approach to the Design of Solar Power Plants
’, 08-May-2014.
2.
B. L.
Kistler
, ‘A User’s Manual for DELSOL3: A Computer Code for Calculating the Optical Performance and Optimal System Design for Solar Thermal Central Receiver Plants’,
Sandia National Laboratories
,
Albuquerque
, SAND86-8018, Nov. 1986.
3.
C.
Noone
,
M.
Torrilhon
, and
A.
Mitsos
,
‘Heliostat Field Optimization: A New Computationally Efficient Model and Biomimetic Layout
’, pp.
792
803
, Feb-2012.
4.
pmorales,
‘Crescent Dunes — SolarReserve
’. [Online]. Available: http://www.solarreserve.com/en/global-projects/csp/crescent-dunes. [Accessed: 14-Jul-2016].
5.
S. L.
Lutchman
,
A. A.
Groenwold
,
P.
Gauché
, and
S.
Bode
,
‘On Using a Gradient-based Method for Heliostat Field Layout Optimization
’,
Energy Procedia
, vol.
49
, pp.
1429
1438
, Jan.
2014
.
6.
M.
Balz
,
‘Stellio Heliostat - Development, Construction and Testing of a Clever Heliostat
’,
presented at the SolarPACES2015
,
Cape Town
.
7.
Maolong
Zhang
,
L.
Yang
,
C.
Xu
, and
Y.
Yang
,
‘Comparing Study of Biomimetic Spiral and Radial Staggered Layouts of the Heliostat Field
’. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876610215003343. [Accessed: 20-Jan-2017].
8.
‘Parallel Programming and Computing Platform | CUDA | NVIDIA | NVIDIA’. [Online]. Available: http://www.nvidia.com/object/cuda_home_new.html. [Accessed: 14-Jul-2016].
9.
Solar Energy Services | Tietronix Software
’. [Online]. Available: http://www.tietronix.com/solar-energy-services. [Accessed: 14-Jul-2016].
10.
H.
Vogel
,
‘A better way to construct the sunflower head
’,
Math. Biosci.
, vol.
44
, no.
3
, pp.
179
189
, Jun.
1979
.
11.
F.
Arbes
,
G.
Weinrebe
, and
M.
Wöhrbach
, ‘
Heliostat field cost reduction by “slope drive” optimization
’, in
SolarPACES Annual Conference 2015
,
Cape Town, South Africa
,
2016
, vol.
1734
, p.
160002
.
12.
R.
Buck
,
‘Heliostat Field Layout Using Non-Restricted Optimization
’, in
ResearchGate
,
2012
.
This content is only available via PDF.