Monitoring the gap between the pressure tube (PT) and the calandria tube (CT) in CANDU® fuel channels is essential, as contact between the two tubes can lead to delayed hydride cracking of the pressure tube. Multifrequency transmit-receive eddy current non-destructive evaluation is used to determine this gap, as this method has different depths of penetration and variable sensitivity to noise, unlike single frequency eddy current non-destructive evaluation. An Analytical model based on the Dodd and Deeds solutions, and a second model that accounts for normal and lossy self-inductances, and a non-coaxial pickup coil, are examined for representing the response of an eddy current transmit-receive probe when considering factors that affect the gap response, such as pressure tube wall thickness and pressure tube resistivity. The multifrequency model data was analyzed using principal components analysis (PCA), a statistical method used to reduce the data set into a data set of fewer variables. The results of the PCA of the analytical models were then compared to PCA performed on a previously obtained experimental data set. The models gave similar results under variable PT wall thickness conditions, but the non-coaxial coil model, which accounts for self-inductive losses, performed significantly better than the Dodd and Deeds model under variable resistivity conditions.

1.
D.
Horn
and
R.
Roiha
, “
Multifrequency Analysis of Eddy Current Data
,” in
NDT (WCNDT)
, Aug.
2004
.
2.
S.
Shokralla
,
J. E.
Morelli
and
T. W.
Krause
, “
Principal Component Analysis of Multifrequency Eddy Current Data Used to Measure Pressure Tube to Calandria Tube Gap
,”
IEEE Sensors Journal
,
16
(
9
),
3147
3154
(May
2016
).
3.
S.
Shokralla
and
T. W.
Krause
, “
Methods for Evaluation of Accuracy with Multiple Essential Parameters for Eddy Current Measurements of Pressure Tube to Calandria Tube Gap in Candu® Reactors
,”
CINDE Journal
,
35
(
1
),
5
8
(Jan./Feb.
2014
).
4.
E. G.
Price
, “
Highlights of the Metallurgical Behaviour of CANDU Pressure Tubes
,”
AECL
,
Chalk River, Ontario
, [Online]. Available: http://www.iaea.org/inis/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/16/042/16042645.pdf. [Accessed 31 August 2016].
5.
C. V.
Dodd
and
W. E.
Deeds
, “
Analytical Solutions to Eddy-current Probe-coil Problems
,”
Journal of Applied Physics
,
39
(
6
),
2829
2839
, (
1968
).
6.
D.
Desjardins
,
T. W.
Krause
and
L.
Clapham
, “
Transient Response of a Driver-pickup Coil Probe in Transient Eddy Current Testing
,”
NDT&E International
,
75
,
8
14
(
2015
).
7.
M. S.
Luloff
,
D.
Desjardins
,
J.
Morelli
and
T. W.
Krause
, “
Solutions for a Transmit-Receive Eddy Current Probe Above a Layered Planar Conductive Structure
,”
NDT&E International
(to be published),
2016
.
8.
T. P.
Theodoulidis
, “
Model of Ferrite-cored Probes for Eddy Current Nondestructive Evaluation
,”
Journal of Applied Physics
,
93
(
5
),
3071
3078
(
2003
).
9.
I. T.
Jollife
,
Principal Component Analysis (Statistics)
,
New York, NY, USA
:
Springer
,
2002
.
10.
J. M.
Lattin
,
J. D.
Carroll
and
P. E.
Green
,
Analyzing Multivariate Data
,
Pacific Grove, CA, USA
:
Brooks/Cole
,
2003
.
11.
Y. H.
Kim
,
S. J.
Song
,
J. S.
Hur
,
E. L.
Kim
,
C. J.
Yim
,
Y. H.
Choi
,
S. C.
Kang
and
M. K.
Song
, “
Inversion of Eddy Current Test Signals Obtained from Steam Generator Tubes
,”
Key Engineering Materials
,
297-300
,
2219
2224
(
2005
).
12.
J. A.
Buck
,
P. R.
Underhill
,
J.
Morelli
and
T. W.
Krause
, “Analysis of Pulsed Eddy Current Data using Regression Models for Steam Generator Tube Support Structure Inspection,” in
Review of Progress of Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation
, eds.
D.E.
Chimenti
and
L.J.
Bond
, (
American Institute of Physics
1706,
Melville NY
)
35
, 090005_1(
10
pp) (
2016
).
13.
A.
Sophian
,
G. Y.
Tian
,
D.
Taylor
and
J.
Rudlin
, “
A Feature Extraction Technique Based on Principal Component Analysis for Pulsed Eddy Current NDT
,”
NDT&E International
,
36
(
1
),
37
41
(
2003
).
14.
V. K.
Babbar
,
P. R.
Underhill
,
C.
Stott
and
T. W.
Krause
, “
Finite Element Modeling of Second Layer Crack Detection in Aircraft Bolt Holes with Ferrous Fasteners Present
,”
NDT&E International
,
65
,
64
71
(
2014
).
15.
C.
Stott
,
P. R.
Underhill
,
V. K.
Babbar
and
T. W.
Krause
, “
Pulsed Eddy Current Detection of Cracks in Multilayer Aluminum Lap Joints
,”
IEEE Sensors Journal
,
15
(
2
),
956
962
(
2015
).
16.
M.
Pan
,
Y.
He
,
G.
Tian
,
D.
Chen
and
F.
Luo
, “
PEC Frequency Band Selection for Locating Defects in Two-layer Aircraft Structures with Air Gap Variations
,”
IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement
,
62
(
10
),
2849
2856
(
2013
).
17.
Y.
He
,
M.
Pan
,
D.
Chen
and
F.
Luo
, “
PEC Defect Automated Classification in Aircraft Multi-ply Structures with Interlayer Gaps and Lift-offs
,”
NDT&E International
,
53
,
39
46
(
2013
).
18.
S.
Shokralla
,
T. W.
Krause
and
J.
Morelli
, “
Surface Profiling with High Density Eddy Current Non-destrive Examination Data
,”
NDT&E International
,
62
,
153
159
(
2014
).
19.
V. S.
Cecco
,
G. V.
Drunen
and
S. P.
Sullivan
,
Eddy Current Testing Manual on Eddy Current Method
,
Chalk River, ON, Canada
:
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited
(
1981
).
20.
Y.
Lu
,
J. R.
Bowler
and
T. P.
Theodoulidis
, “
An Analytical Model of a Ferrite-cored Inductor used as an Eddy Current Probe
,”
Journal of Applied Physics
,
111
,
103907
(
2012
).
21.
MathWorks
, “
Principal Component Analysis of Raw Data
,” [Online]. Available: http://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/pca.html. [Accessed 18 August 2016].
This content is only available via PDF.