In order to nondestructively characterize the interface roughness of coatings effectively, the ultrasonic reflection coefficient amplitude spectrum (URCAS) involving interface roughness was derived based on the phase-screen approximation theory. The interface roughness was determined by a two-parameter inversion combined with a cross-correlation algorithm. For homogeneous coatings, the effects of ultrasonic wavelength λ, beam coverage, and shape variations of the coating on the roughness measurements were analyzed through numerical calculation. A series of simulations indicated that measurement errors were less than 10% when the relationship between interface roughness and wavelength satisfied Rq=1.5%λ∼11%λ approximately. Ultrasonic experiments were carried out on standard roughness specimens utilizing water immersion, flat transducers. The roughness Rq of the standard roughness specimens were 8.5 µm, 14.2 µm, and 28.6 µm measured by confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM), respectively. Experimental results show that the roughness of standard roughness specimens obtained by the proposed ultrasonic measurement are in good agreement with the CLSM observations, and the relative errors are less than 8.5%.

1.
D D.
Sukmana
and
I
Ihara
, “
Quantitative evaluation of two kinds of surface roughness parameters using air-coupled ultrasound
,” in
Japanese Journal of Applied Physics
,
46
(
7S
),
4508
(
2007
).
2.
X F
Zhang
,
K S
Zhou
,
J B
Song
, et al, “
Effect of bond coating surface roughness on properties of high temperature oxidation and mechanical properties in thermal barrier coatings
,”
Journal of The Chinese Ceramic Society
.
41
(
12
),
1674
1678
(
2013
).
3.
P J
Hou
,
H G
Wang
,
B L
Zha
, et al, “
Numerical simulation for effect of interface roughness on residual stress of double-layer thermal barrier coatings
,”
Hot Working Technology
,
07
,
82
85
(
2007
).
4.
W
Zheng
,
P
Li
and
Y K
Wang
, “
Effects of interface roughness on distribution of residual stress in thermally-growth oxide layer
,”
Hot Working Technology
,
10
,
152
153
(
2013
).
5.
W X
Zhang
,
X L
Fan
, and
T J
Wang
, “
The surface cracking behavior in air plasma sprayed thermal barrier coating system incorporating interface roughness effect
,”
Applied Surface Science
,
258
(
2
),
811
817
(
2011
).
6.
Z Y
Ma
,
Y
Zhao
,
Z B
Luo
, et al, “
Ultrasonic characterization of thermally grown oxide in thermal barrier coating by reflection coefficient amplitude spectrum
,”
Ultrasonics
,
54
(
4
),
1005
1009
(
2014
).
7.
Z
Wang
,
T T
Guo
,
Y S
Zhou
, et al, “
Measuring methods of non-contact surface roughness
,”
Mechanical Engineer
,
04
,
66
67
(
2009
).
8.
B
Liu
,
Q B
Feng
, and
C F
Kuang
, “
Survey of measurement methods for surface roughness
,”
Optical Instruments
,
05
,
54
58
(
2004
).
9.
S L
Roux
,
F
Deschaux
,
T
Cutard
, et al, “
Quantitative assessment of the interfacial roughness in multi-layered materials using image analysis: Application to oxidation in ceramic-based materials
,”
Journal of the European Ceramic Society
,
09
,
027
(
2014
).
10.
S M
Feng
,
H Y
Zhao
,
M Z
Huang
, et al, “
Method of calculating interfacial roughness of multilayers for soft X-Ray
,”
Acta Optica Sinica
.
08
,
980
983
(
2003
).
11.
P B
Nagy
, and
J H
Rose
, “
Surface roughness and the ultrasonic detection of subsurface scatterers
,”
Journal of applied physics
,
73
(
2
),
566
580
(
1993
).
12.
N
Garcia
, and
E
Stoll
, “
Monte Carlo calculation for electromagnetic-wave scattering from random rough surfaces
,”
Physical Review Letters
,
52
(
20
),
1798
1801
(
1984
).
13.
C
Lu
,
G H
Wu
, and
G W
Ma
, “
Improved pulsed ultrasonic spectroscopy for adhesive surface roughness measurement of aerial titanium alloy plates
,”
Journal of Test and Measurement Technology
,
01
,
59
65
(
2008
).
14.
Z Y
Ma
,
Z B
Luo
, and
L
Lin
, “
Characterization of ultrasonic longitudinal velocity evolution in TBCs with different porosity and void morphology based on random void model
,”
Journal of Materials Engineering
,
4
,
86
90
(
2014
).
This content is only available via PDF.