Ultrasonic Rayleigh waves can be employed for the detection of surface breaking defects such as rolling contact fatigue and stress corrosion cracking. Electromagnetic Acoustic Transducers (EMATs) are well suited to this technique as they can directly generate Rayleigh waves within the sample without the requirement for wedges, and they are robust and inexpensive compared to laser ultrasonics. Three different EMAT coil types have been developed, and these are compared to assess their ability to detect and characterize small (down to 0.5 mm depth, 1 mm diameter) surface breaking defects in aluminium. These designs are: a pair of linear meander coils used in a pseudo-pulse-echo mode, a pair of focused meander coils also used in pseudo-pulse-echo mode, and a pair of focused racetrack coils used in pitch-catch mode. The linear meander coils are able to detect most of the defects tested, but have a much lower signal to noise ratio and give limited sizing information. The focused meander coils and the focused racetrack coils can detect all defects tested, but have the advantage that they can also characterize the defect sizes on the sample surface, and have a stronger sensitivity at their focal point. Measurements using all three EMAT designs are presented and compared for high resolution imaging of surface-breaking defects.

1.
M.
Hirao
and
H.
Ogi
,
EMATs for Science and Industry: Noncontacting Ultrasonic Measurements
(
Kluwer Academic Publishers
,
Boston
,
2003
).
2.
S.
Dixon
and
X.
Jian
,
Applied Physics Letters
89
, p.
193503
(
2006
).
3.
R. S.
Edwards
,
S.
Dixon
, and
X.
Jian
,
Ultrasonics
44
,
93
98
(
2006
).
4.
J. W.
Ringsberg
,
International Journal of Fatigue
23
,
575
586
(
2001
).
5.
W. A. K.
Deutsch
,
A.
Cheng
, and
J. D.
Achenbach
,
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
2A
,
333
340
(
1983
).
6.
S.
Dixon
,
T.
Harrison
,
Y.
Fan
, and
P. A.
Petcher
,
Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics
45
, p.
175103
(
2012
).
7.
T.
Stratoudaki
,
J. A.
Hernandez
,
M.
Clark
, and
M. G.
Somekh
,
Measurement Science & Technology
18
,
843
851
(
2007
).
8.
H.
Ogi
,
M.
Hirao
, and
T.
Ohtani
,
Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
46
,
341
346
(
1999
).
9.
T.
Takishita
,
K.
Ashida
,
N.
Nakamura
,
H.
Ogi
, and
M.
Hirao
,
Japanese Journal of Applied Physicsl
54
, p.
07HC04
(
2015
).
10.
American Society for Testing and Materials
:
Standard practice for ultrasonic examinations using electromagnetic acoustic transducer (EMAT) techniques, Designation: E 1816 - 96
(
1996
).
11.
M. H.
Rosli
,
B.
Dutton
, and
R. S.
Edwards
,
NDT&E International
49
,
1
9
(
2012
).
12.
J. P.
Morrison
,
S.
Dixon
,
M. D. G.
Potter
, and
X.
Jian
,
Ultrasonics
44
,
1401
1404
(
2006
).
13.
C. B.
Thring
,
Y.
Fan
, and
R. S.
Edwards
,
Non-Destructive Testing and Evaluation International
81
,
20
27
(
2016
).
This content is only available via PDF.