Reduced product lifecycle and increasing demand for electronic devices have resulted in the generation of huge volumes of electronic waste (e-waste). E-wastes contain high concentrations of toxic heavy metals, which have detrimental effects on health and the environment. However, e-wastes also contain significant concentrations of precious metals such as gold, silver and palladium, which can be a major driving force for recycling of urban waste. Cyanogenic bacteria such as Chromobacterium violaceum generate cyanide as a secondary metabolite which mobilizes gold into solution via a soluble gold-cyanide complex. However, compared to conventional technology for metal recovery, this approach is not effective, owing largely to the low concentration of lixiviants produced by the bacteria. To overcome the challenges of bioleaching of gold from e-waste, several strategies were adopted to enhance gold recovery rates. These included (i) pretreatment of e-waste to remove competing metal ions, (ii) mutation to adapt the bacteria to high pH environment, (iii) metabolic engineering to produce higher cyanide lixiviant, and (iv) spent medium leaching with adjusted initial pH. Compared to 7.1 % recovery by the wild type bacteria, these strategies achieved gold recoveries of 11.3%, 22.5%, 30% and 30% respectively at 0.5% w/v pulp density respectively. Bioleached gold was finally mineralized and precipitated as gold nanoparticles using the bacterium Delftia acidovorans. This study demonstrates the potential for enhancement of biocyanide production and gold recovery from electronic waste through different strategies, and extraction of solid gold from bioleached leachate.

1.
E. Y.
Sum
,
JOM
43
(
4
),
53
61
(
1991
).
2.
B. R.
Babu
,
A. K.
Parande
and
C. A.
Basha
,
Waste Management & Research
25
(
4
),
307
318
(
2007
).
3.
G.
Natarajan
and
Y.-P.
Ting
,
Bioresource Technology
152
,
80
85
(
2014
).
4.
S. B.
Tay
,
G.
Natarajan
,
M. N.
bin Abdul Rahim
,
H. T.
Tan
,
M. C. M.
Chung
,
Y. P.
Ting
and
W. S.
Yew
,
Scientific Reports
3
(
2013
).
5.
K. M. M.
Aung
and
Y.-P.
Ting
,
Journal of Biotechnology
116
(
2
),
159
170
(
2005
).
6.
H.
Brandl
,
S.
Lehmann
,
M. A.
Faramarzi
and
D.
Martinelli
,
Hydrometallurgy
94
(
1
),
14
17
(
2008
).
7.
W.
Krebs
,
C.
Brombacher
,
P. P.
Bosshard
,
R.
Bachofen
and
H.
Brandl
,
FEMS Microbiology Reviews
20
(
3-4
),
605
617
(
1997
).
8.
D. E.
Rawlings
,
Annual Reviews in Microbiology
56
(
1
),
65
91
(
2002
).
9.
W. H.
Dresher
,
CWD: INNOVATIONS
, May issue, p.
10
(
2004
).
10.
J.-K.
Wen
,
B.-W.
Chen
,
H.
Shang
and
G.-C.
Zhang
,
Rare Metals
35
(
6
),
433
442
(
2016
).
11.
C. J.
Knowles
and
A. W.
Bunch
,
Advances in Microbial Physiology
27
,
73
111
(
1986
).
12.
M. A.
Faramarzi
,
M.
Stagars
,
E.
Pensini
,
W.
Krebs
and
H.
Brandl
,
Journal of Biotechnology
113
(
1
),
321
326
(
2004
).
13.
S.
Das
,
B.
Dong
and
Y. P.
Ting
,
Advanced Materials Research
1130
,
668
672
(
2015
).
14.
G.
Natarajan
and
Y.-P.
Ting
,
Chemosphere
136
,
232
238
(
2015
).
This content is only available via PDF.