Conventional prosthesis fabrication is highly depends on the hand creativity of laboratory technologist. The development in 3D printing technology offers a great help in fabricating affordable and fast yet esthetically acceptable prostheses. This study was conducted to discover the potential of 3D printed moulds for indirect silicone elastomer based nasal prosthesis fabrication. Moulds were designed using computer aided design (CAD) software (Solidworks, USA) and converted into the standard tessellation language (STL) file. Three moulds with layer thickness of 0.1, 0.2 and 0.3mm were printed utilizing polymer filament based 3D printer (Makerbot Replicator 2X, Makerbot, USA). Another one mould was printed utilizing liquid resin based 3D printer (Objet 30 Scholar, Stratasys, USA) as control. The printed moulds were then used to fabricate maxillofacial silicone specimens (n=10)/mould. Surface profilometer (Surfcom Flex, Accretech, Japan), digital microscope (KH77000, Hirox, USA) and scanning electron microscope (Quanta FEG 450, Fei, USA) were used to measure the surface roughness as well as the topological properties of fabricated silicone. Statistical analysis of One-Way ANOVA was employed to compare the surface roughness of the fabricated silicone elastomer. Result obtained demonstrated significant differences in surface roughness of the fabricated silicone (p<0.01). Further post hoc analysis also revealed significant differences in silicone fabricated using different 3D printed moulds (p<0.01). A 3D printed mould was successfully prepared and characterized. With surface topography that could be enhanced, inexpensive and rapid mould fabrication techniques, polymer filament based 3D printer is potential for indirect silicone elastomer based nasal prosthesis fabrication.

1.
L.E
Vickery
,
G.
Latchford
,
J.
Hewison
,
Head & Neck.
25
,
289
296
(
2003
)
2.
S.
Khalaf
,
Z.
Ariffin
,
A.
Hussein
,
F.
Reza
,
J. Prosthodont.
00
,
1
5
(
2014
)
3.
P.E.
Harris
,
S.
Hoyer
,
T.J
Lindquist
,
C.M.
Standford
,
J. Prosthet. Dent.
92
,
35
38
(
2004
)
4.
N.A.
Mohamed
and
Z.A.
Rajion
,
J. Teknol.
76
,
63
68
(
2015
)
5.
A.M.
Abdullah
,
D.
Mohamad
,
T.N.A.T
Rahim
,
H.Md.
Akil
,
Z.A.
Rajion
,
J. Teknol.
76
,
75
79
(
2015
)
6.
S.
Khalaf
,
Z.
Ariffin
,
A.
Hussein
,
F.
Reza
,
W. J. Med. Sci
11
,
161
165
(
2014
)
This content is only available via PDF.