Malaysian honey and propolis extracts were investigated for their antifungal properties against pathogens implicated in denture stomatitis. Each of the honey and aqueous extracts propolis at net preparation, 1:1 and 1:2 dilutions was evaluated by using agar well diffusion assay and further investigated by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) within the range of 500 mg/mL to 62.5 mg/mL against oral fungi. The findings indicated that there was no effect of propolis on Candida spp for both types of propolis based on no inhibition zones was recorded. Meanwhile, for antifungal activity of honey, only honey from Trigona spp has shown activity at net preparation against C. albicans (10.47 ± 0.23 mm), C. tropicalis (12.29 ± 0.23 mm) and C. glabrata (8.69 ± 0.53 mm). For minimum inhibitory concentration, the data indicates that both propolis have shown inhibitory effect at 500 mg/mL. As for honey, Trigona spp was the effective honey that give MIC value at 250 mg/mL against Candida spp. Apis dorsata honey has shown MIC value at 500 mg/mL while Apis mellifera honey had inhibited C.albicans and C.glabrata at 500 mg/mL except for C.tropicalis at 250 mg/mL. It can be concluded that both propolis has shown weaker antifungal activity against oral fungi while only honey produced from Trigona spp had strong antifungal activity compare to other honey against oral fungi implicated in denture stomatitis.

1.
J.
Barbeau
,
J.
Seguin
,
J. P.
Goulet
,
L.
Koninck
,
S. L.
Avon
,
B.
Lalonde
,
P.
Rompre
and
N.
Deslauriers
.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,
95
(
1
),
51
9
(
2003
).
2.
K. L.
Boorn
,
Y.Y.
Khor
,
E.
Sweetman
,
F.
Tan
,
T.A.
Heard
and
K.A.
Hammer
.
Journal of Applied Microbiology
,
108
(
2010
),
1534
1543
(
2009
).
3.
M. R.
Dastouri
,
K.
Fakhimzadeh
,
J.
Shayeg
,
S. J.
Dolgari
,
M. R.
Valilou
and
S. N.
Maheri
.
Journal Animal Veterinary Advance
,
7
(
4
),
409
412
(
2008
).
4.
J. H.
Demera
and
E. R.
Angert
.
Apidologie, Springer verlag,
(
4
),
411
417
(
2004
).
5.
K. F.
Devienne
and
M. S. G.
Raddi
.
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology,
33
,
166
168
(
2002
).
6.
E. L.
Hazen
and
E. R.
Angert
.
Annals of the New York Academy of Science
,
89
,
258
266
(
1960
).
7.
Y.
Kulak
,
A.
Arikan
and
E.
Kazazoglu
.
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
,
24
,
788
790
(
1997
).
8.
P.E.
Lusby
,
A. L.
Coombes
and
J. M.
Wilkinson
.
Arch. Med. Res.
,
36
(
5
),
464
467
(
2005
).
9.
M. D.
Mignogna
,
L. Lo
Muzio
,
L. Lo
Russo
,
S.
Fedele
,
E.
Ruoppo
and
E.
Bucci
.
Oral Oncology
,
37
(
3
),
262
7
(
2001
).
10.
C. M.
Nwankwo
,
C. C.
Ezekoye
and
S. O.
Igbokwe
.
African Journal of Biotechnology
,
13
(
23
),
2367
2372
(
2014
).
11.
B. O.
Omafuvbe
and
O. O.
Akanbi
.
African Journal of Microbiology Research
,
3
(
12
),
891
896
(
2009
).
12.
L. C.
Paviani
,
C.
Dariva
,
M. C.
Marcucci
and
F. A.
Cabral
.
J Food Process Eng.
,
33
(
1
),
15
27
(
2012
).
13.
M. N.
Pemberton
,
R. J.
Oliver
and
E. D.
Theaker
.
British Dental Journal
,
196
,
529
531
(
2004
).
14.
V. R.
Santos
,
R. T. Gomes
Santiago
,
W. K.
Paula
,
A. M.
Cortes
and
S. M.
Dias
.
Journal of Basic and Applied Pharmaceutical Sciences
,
28
,
259
263
(
2007
).
15.
V. R.
Santos
,
R. T.
Gomes
,
R. A.
Mesquita
,
M. D. G.
Moura
,
E. C.
Franca
,
E. G.
Aguiar
,
M. D.
Naves
,
J. A. S.
Abreu
, and
S. R. L.
Abreu
.
Phytotherapy Research
,
22
,
1544
1547
(
2008
).
16.
A.
Shehu
,
S.
Ismail
,
M. A. K.
Rohin
,
A.
Harun
,
A. A.
Aziz
and
M.
Haque
.
J App Pharm Sci
,
6
(
2
),
044
050
(
2016
).
17.
H. T.
Tan
,
R. A.
Rahman
,
S. H.
Gan
,
A. S.
Halim
,
S. A.
Hassan
,
S. A.
Sulaiman
, and
B. S.
Kirnpal-Kaur
.
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
,
9
(
34
),
1472
6882
(
2009
).
This content is only available via PDF.