Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is an imaging system which has advantages over computed tomography (CT). Recently, CBCT has become widely used for oral and maxillofacial imaging. In CT scan, Hounsfield Unit (HU) is proportional to the degree of x-ray attenuation by the tissue. In CBCT, the degree of x-ray attenuation is shown by gray scale (voxel value). The aim of the present (in vitro) study was to investigate the relationship between gray scale in CBCT and HU in CT scan. In this descriptive study, the anthropomorphic head phantom was scanned with CBCT and CT scanner. Gray scales and HUs were detected on images at the crown of the teeth, trabecular and cortical bone of mandible. The images were analyzed to obtain the gray scale value and HU value. The obtained value then used to investigate the relationship between CBCT gray scales and HUs. For the statistical analysis, t-test, Pearson’s correlation and regression analysis were used. The differences between the gray scale of CBCT and HU of CT were statistically not significant, whereas the Pearson’s correlation coefficients demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between gray scale of CBCT and HU of CT values. Considering the fact that gray scale in CBCT is important in pre assessment evaluation of bone density before implant treatments, it is recommended because of the lower dose and cost compared to CT scan.

1.
P.
Aranyarachkul
,
J.
Caruso
,
B.
Gantes
, et al.,
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
20
,
416
424
(
2005
).
2.
V.
Arisan
,
Z. C.
Karabuda
,
H.
Avsever
,
T.
Özdemir
,
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
15
,
893
906
(
2013
).
3.
M.
Cassetta
,
L. V.
Stefanelli
,
S.
Di Carlo
,
G.
Pompa
and
E.
Barbato
,
European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences
16
,
1425
1429
(
2012
).
4.
M.
Cassetta
,
L. V.
Stefanelli
,
A.
Pacifici
,
L.
Pacifici
and
E.
Barbato
,
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
16
,
893
906
(
2014
).
5.
A.
Katsumata
,
A.
Hirukawa
,
S.
Okumura
,
M.
Naitoh
,
M.
Fujishita
,
E.
Ariji
, et al.,
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
104
,
829
836
(
2007
).
6.
M. O.
Lagravère
,
Y.
Fang
,
J.
Carey
,
R. W.
Toogood
,
G. V.
Packota
and
P. W.
Major
.
Dentomaxillofomaxillofacial Radiology
35
,
407
409
(
2006
).
7.
P.
Mah
,
T. E.
Reeves
and
W. D.
McDavid
,
Dentomaxillofac Radiol
39
,
323
335
(
2010
).
8.
M.
Naitoh
,
A.
Hirukawa
,
A.
Katsumata
and
E.
Ariji
,
Clin Oral Implants Res
20
,
503
506
(
2009
).
9.
M. L.
Oliveira
,
D. Q.
Freitas
,
G. M. B.
Ambrosano
and
F.
Haiter-Neto
,
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
43
, (
2014
)
20140128
.
10.
A.
Parsa
,
N.
Ibrahim
and
B.
Hassan
.
The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
27,
1438
1442
(
2012
).
11.
R.
Pauwels
,
O.
Nackaerts
,
N.
Bellaiche
,
H.
Stamatakis
,
K.
Tsiklakis
,
A.
Walker
, et al.,
Br J Radiol
86
, (
2013
)
20120135
.
12.
R.
Pauwels
,
R.
Jacobs
,
S. R.
Singer
and
M.
Mupparapu
,
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
44
, (
2015
)
20140238
.
13.
T.
Razi
,
M.
Niknami
and
F. A.
Ghazani
.
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospect
8
,
107
110
(
2014
).
This content is only available via PDF.