The efficiency of the solar field greatly depends on the ability of the heliostats to precisely reflect solar radiation onto a central receiver. To control the heliostats with such a precision requires the accurate knowledge of the motion of each of them. The motion of each heliostat can be described by a set of parameters, most notably the position and axis configuration. These parameters have to be determined individually for each heliostat during a calibration process. With the ongoing development of small sized heliostats, the ability to automatically perform such a calibration becomes more and more crucial as possibly hundreds of thousands of heliostats are involved. Furthermore, efficiency becomes an important factor as small sized heliostats potentially have to be recalibrated far more often, due to the limited stability of the components. In the following we present an automatic calibration procedure using cameras attached to each heliostat which are observing different targets spread throughout the solar field. Based on a number of observations of these targets under different heliostat orientations, the parameters describing the heliostat motion can be estimated with high precision.

1.
K.W.
Stone
, “
Automatic heliostat track alignment method
” U.S. Patent No. 4,564,275, (14 January
1986
)
2.
M.
Berenguel
 et al., “
An artificial vision-based control system for automatic heliostat positioning offset correction in a central receiver solar power plant
,” in
Solar Energy
76
.
5
(
2004
), pp.
563
575
.
3.
M.
Zavodny
 et al., “
Tower-based CSP Artificial Light Calibration System
,” in
Energy Procedia
69
(
2015
), pp.
1488
1497
.
4.
A.
Kribus
 et al., “
Closed loop control of heliostats
,” in
Energy
29
.
5
(
2004
), pp.
905
913
.
5.
A.
Pfahl
,
R.
Buck
and
K.
Rehschuh
, “
Method for controlling the alignment of a heliostat with respect to a receiver, heliostat device and solar power plant
” U.S. Patent No. 8,651,100. (18 February
2014
)
6.
K.
Hickerson
and
D.
Reznik
, “
Heliostat with integrated image-based tracking controller
” U.S. Patent No. 7,906,750. (15 March
2011
)
7.
P.
Tolley
, “
Polymer Optics Gain Respect-New materials, improved tooling and innovative design bring plastic optics to the forefront of defense, biometrics applications and more
,” in
Photonics Spectra
37
.
10
(
2003
), pp.
76
79
.
8.
V.
Coffey
, “
Plastic Optics: Provide Precision
,” in
Photonics Spectra
46
.
12
(
2012
), pp.
50
53
.
9.
R.
Hirt
 et al., “
Ultraviolet degradation of plastics and the use of protective ultraviolet absorbers
,” in
Polymer Engineering & Science
1
.
1
(
1961
), pp.
21
25
.
10.
R.
Hartley
and
A.
Zisserman
,
Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision
, (
Cambridge University Press
,
New York
,
2004
).
11.
R.
Gonzalez
and
R.
Woods
,
Digital Image Processing (3rd Edition)
, (
Prentice-Hall, Inc.
,
Upper Saddle River
,
2006
).
12.
D.
Claus
and
A.
Fitzgibbon
, “
A rational function lens distortion model for general cameras
,” in
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(
2005
),
CVPR 2005, IEEE Computer Society Conference on
. Vol.
1
, pp.
213
219
.
13.
C.
Broyden
, “
The convergence of a class of double-rank minimization algorithms 1. general considerations
,” in
IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics
6
.
1
(
1970
), pp.
76
90
.
14.
M.
Fischler
and
R.
Bolles
, “
Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography
,” in
Communications of the ACM
24
.
6
(
1981
), pp.
381
395
.
15.
P.
Rousseeuw
and
A.
Leroy
,
Robust Regression and Outlier Detection
, (
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
,
New York
,
1987
).
This content is only available via PDF.