The study was carried out to reconstruct the science teaching materials charged view of the nature of science (VNOS). This reconstruction process using the Model of Educational Reconstruction (MER), which is the framework for research and development of science education as well as a guide for planning the teaching of science in the schools is limited in two stages, namely: content structure analysis, and empirical studies of learners. The purpose of this study is to obtain a pre-conception of learners and prospective scientists to the topic of the nature of the material and utilization. The method used to descriptive with the instruments is guidelines for interviews for 15 students of class VIII, text analysis sheet, sheet analysis of the concept, and the validation sheet indicators and learning objectives NOS charged on cognitive and affective aspects. The results obtained in the form of pre-conceptions of learners who demonstrate almost 100% of students know the types of materials and some of its nature, the results of the scientist’s perspective on the topic of the nature of the material and its use, as well as the results of the validation indicators and learning objectives charged NOS and competencies PISA 2015 cognitive and affective aspects with CVI value of 0.99 and 1.0 after being validated by five experts. This suggests that the indicators and the resulting learning objectives feasible and can proceed to the reconstruction of teaching materials on the topic of material properties and utilization.

1.
J.
Holbrook
and
M.
Rannikmae
,
Intl. J. Environ. Sci. Educ.
4
,
275
288
(
2009
).
2.
OECD
,
PISA 2012 Results in Focus What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know
(
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2014
).
3.
OECD
,
PISA 2015 Draft Science Framework
(
OECD Publishing
,
Paris
,
2013
).
4.
W. F.
McComas
,
The nature of Science in Science Education Rationales and Strategies
(
Kluwer Academic Press
,
United States of America
,
2002
).
5.
N. G.
Lederman
dan
A.
El-Khalik
,
J. Res. Sci. Teach.
39
,
497
521
(
2002
).
6.
S.
Zubaidah
,
S.
Mahanal
 et al,
Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam
(
Kemendikbud
,
Jakarta
,
2014
), pp.
108
126
.
7.
A. N.
Aulia
, “
Analisis Buku Teks Biologi SMP Di Kota Bandung Berdasarkan Hakikat Sains
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung
,
2013
.
8.
J.
Holbrook
,
Chem. Educ. Intl.
6
,
1
12
(
2005
).
9.
V. L.
Ackerson
,
J. Sci. Teach. Educ.
21
,
723
745
(
2010
).
10.
R. S.
Schwartz
,
Intl. J. Sci. Educ.
30
,
727
771
(
2008
).
11.
R.
Duit
,
H.
Gropengießer
, and
U.
Kattmann
,
Sci. Educ. Res. Pract. Eur. Cultural Perspective Sci. Educ.
5
,
13
37
(
2012
).
12.
F. R.
Wilson
,
W.
Pan
, and
D. A.
Schumsky
,
Meas. Eval. Couns. Dev.
20
,
1
14
(
2012
).
13.
A.
Laherto
,
Making use of Educational Research in the Planning of a Nanoscience Exhibition
,
1
7
(
2012
).
This content is only available via PDF.