Mathematics often perceived as a difficult subject with many students failing to understand why they learn mathematics. This situation has been further aggravated by the teaching and learning processes used, which is mechanistic without considering students’ needs. The learning of mathematics tends to be just a compulsory subject, in which all students have to attend its classes. Social justice framework facilitates individuals or groups as a whole and provides equitable approaches to achieving equitable outcomes by recognising disadvantage. Applying social justice principles in educational context is related to how the teachers treat their students, dictates that all students the right to equal treatment regardless of their background and completed with applying social justice issues integrated with the content of the subject in order to internalise the principles of social justice simultaneously the concepts of the subject. The study examined the usefulness of implementing the social justice framework as a means of improving the quality of mathematics teaching in Indonesia involved four teacher-participants and their mathematics classes. The study used action research as the research methodology in which the teachers implemented and evaluated their use of social justice framework in their teaching. The data were collected using multiple research methods while analysis and interpretation of the data were carried out throughout the study. The findings of the study indicated that there were a number of challengesrelated to the implementation of the social justice framework. The findings also indicated that, the teachers were provided with a comprehensive guide that they could draw on to make decisions about how they could improve their lessons. The interactions among students and between the teachers and the students improved, they became more involved in teaching and learning process. Using social justice framework helped the teachers to make mathematics more relevant to students. This increased relevance led to increasing students’ engagement in the teaching and learning process and becoming more accessible to all students. Additionally, the findings have the potential to make a contribution to those seeking to reform mathematics teaching in Indonesia. The results could inform policy makers and professional development providers about how social justice framework might contribute to the educational reform in Indonesia.

1.
Parveva
,
T.
,
Noorani
,
S.
,
Ranguelov
,
S.
,
Motiejunaite
,
A.
, &
Kerpanova
,
V.
(
2011
).
Mathematics education in Europe: Common challenges and national policies
.
Brussels
:
Eurydice
.
2.
Schmidt
,
K. D.
(
2011
).
Mathematics for a broken, beautiful world: A modular resource package for late secondary and early post-secondary math educators
. (
An Independent Learning Project
). Unpublished.
3.
Anthony
,
G.
&
Walshaw
,
M.
(
2007
).
Effective pedagogy in mathematics: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration [BES]
.
Wellington, New Zealand
:
Ministry of Education
.
4.
Hadi
,
S.
(
2002
).
Effective teacher professional development for the implementation of realistic mathematics education in Indonesia
. Enschede: Doctoral dissertation,
University of Twente
.
5.
O’Kane
,
C.
(
2002
).
Marginalized children as social actors for social justice in South Asia
.
British Journal of Social Work
,
32
,
697
710
.
6.
Keddie
,
A.
(
2011
).
Educating for diversity and social justice
.
New York
:
Routledge
.
7.
Kemmis
,
S.
, &
McTaggart
,
R.
(
1988
).
The action research planner
.
Victoria, Australia
:
Deakin University
.
8.
Creswell
,
J. W.
(
2008
).
Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research
(3rded.).
New Jersey, US
:
Pearson Education, Inc
.
9.
Morgan
,
D. L.
(
1998
).
The focus group guidebook
.
Thousand Oaks, CA
:
Sage
.
10.
Guba
,
E.
, &
Lincoln
,
Y.
(
1989
).
Fourth generation evaluation
.
Thousand Oaks, CA
:
Sage Publications
.
11.
Yin
,
R. K.
(
2011
).
Qualitative research from start to finish
.
New York
:
The Guilford Press
.
12.
Aldridge
,
J. M.
,
Fraser
,
B. J.
, &
Huang
,
I. T.C.
(
1999
).
Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods
.
The Journal of Educational Research
,
93
(
1
),
48
62
.
13.
Alhosni
,
K. Z.
(
2013
). Using productive pedagogies as a framework for promoting the quality teaching of Omani mathematics teachers. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis,
Curtin University Perth
.
14.
Bature
,
I. J.
(
2014
).
Productive pedagogies for reforming secondary school mathematics classroom practice in Nigeria
. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis,
Curtin University, Perth
.
15.
Alsharif
,
K. M.
(
2011
).
Towards quality teacher education: Productive pedagogies as a framework for Saudi pre-service teachers’ training in mathematics education
. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis,
Curtin University, Perth
.
16.
Gay
,
G.
(
2000
).
Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, & practice
.
New York, NY
:
Teachers College Press
.
17.
Cobb
,
P.
(
1994
).
Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematical development
.
Educational Researcher
,
23
(
7
),
13
20
.
18.
Calderhead
,
J.
(
1989
).
Reflective teaching and teacher education
.
Teaching and Teacher Education
,
5
,
43
51
.
19.
Mims
,
C.
(
2003
).
Authentic learning: A practical introduction & guide for implementation
.
Meridian: Middle School Computer Technology Journal
,
6
(
1
),
1
3
.
This content is only available via PDF.