Degradation of the cable jacket, electrical insulation, and other cable components of installed cables within nuclear power plants (NPPs) is known to occur as a function of age, temperature, radiation, and other environmental factors. System tests verify cable function under normal loads; however, the concern is over cable performance under exceptional loads associated with design-basis events (DBEs). The cable’s ability to perform safely over the initial 40-year planned and licensed life has generally been demonstrated and there have been very few age-related cable failures. With greater than 1000 km of power, control, instrumentation, and other cables typically found in an NPP, replacing all the cables would be a severe cost burden. Justification for life extension to 60 and 80 years requires a cable aging management program to justify cable performance under normal operation as well as accident conditions. Currently the gold standard for determining cable insulation degradation is the elongation-at-break (EAB). This, however, is an ex-situ measurement and requires removal of a sample for laboratory investigation. A reliable nondestructive examination (NDE) in-situ approach is desirable to objectively determine the suitability of the cable for service. A variety of tests are available to assess various aspects of electrical and mechanical cable performance, but none of these tests are suitable for all cable configurations nor does any single test confirm all features of interest. Nevertheless, the complete collection of test possibilities offers a powerful range of tools to assure the integrity of critical cables. Licensees and regulators have settled on a practical program to justify continued operation based on condition monitoring of a lead sample set of cables where test data is tracked in a database and the required test data are continually adjusted based on plant and fleet-wide experience. As part of the Light Water Reactor Sustainability program sponsored by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the U.S. Department of Energy, and industry (represented by the Electric Power Research Institute), an assessment of cable NDE methods was commissioned. Technologies include both bulk electrical measurements (Tan δ, time domain reflectometry, frequency domain reflectometry (FDR), partial discharge, and other techniques) and local insulation measurement (indenter, dynamic mechanical analysis interdigital capacitance, infrared spectral measurement, etc.). This aging cable NDE program update reviews the full range of techniques but focuses on the most interesting test approaches that have a chance to be deployed in-situ, particularly including Tan δ, FDR, and ultrasound methods that have been reviewed most completely in this progress period.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
10 February 2016
42ND ANNUAL REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION: Incorporating the 6th European-American Workshop on Reliability of NDE
26–31 July 2015
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Research Article|
February 10 2016
Assessment of NDE for key indicators of aging cables in nuclear power plants – Interim status
S. W. Glass;
S. W. Glass
a)
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, US
Search for other works by this author on:
P. Ramuhalli;
P. Ramuhalli
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, US
Search for other works by this author on:
L. S. Fifield;
L. S. Fifield
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, US
Search for other works by this author on:
M. S. Prowant;
M. S. Prowant
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, US
Search for other works by this author on:
G. Dib;
G. Dib
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, US
Search for other works by this author on:
J. R. Tedeschi;
J. R. Tedeschi
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, US
Search for other works by this author on:
J. D. Suter;
J. D. Suter
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, US
Search for other works by this author on:
A. M. Jones;
A. M. Jones
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, US
Search for other works by this author on:
M. S. Good;
M. S. Good
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, US
Search for other works by this author on:
A. F. Pardini;
A. F. Pardini
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, US
Search for other works by this author on:
T. S. Hartman
T. S. Hartman
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
, P.O. Box 999, Richland, Washington 99352, US
Search for other works by this author on:
a)
Corresponding author: Bill.Glass@pnnl.gov
AIP Conf. Proc. 1706, 170006 (2016)
Citation
S. W. Glass, P. Ramuhalli, L. S. Fifield, M. S. Prowant, G. Dib, J. R. Tedeschi, J. D. Suter, A. M. Jones, M. S. Good, A. F. Pardini, T. S. Hartman; Assessment of NDE for key indicators of aging cables in nuclear power plants – Interim status. AIP Conf. Proc. 10 February 2016; 1706 (1): 170006. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4940629
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Design of a 100 MW solar power plant on wetland in Bangladesh
Apu Kowsar, Sumon Chandra Debnath, et al.
Inkjet- and flextrail-printing of silicon polymer-based inks for local passivating contacts
Zohreh Kiaee, Andreas Lösel, et al.
Production and characterization of corncob biochar for agricultural use
Praphatsorn Rattanaphaiboon, Nigran Homdoung, et al.
Related Content
Frequency domain reflectometry NDE for aging cables in nuclear power plants
AIP Conference Proceedings (February 2017)
The NASA cosmic ray program for the 1990’s and beyond Interim report of the NASA Cosmic Ray Program Working Group
AIP Conference Proceedings (March 1990)
Interim sites for spent nuclear fuel are of limited value
Physics Today (April 2007)
Conformable eddy current array delivery
AIP Conference Proceedings (February 2016)
Comparison of wind power estimates from the ECMWF reanalyses with direct turbine measurements
J. Renewable Sustainable Energy (June 2009)