Advances in manufacturing techniques and materials have led to an increase in the demand for reliable and robust inspection techniques to maintain safety critical features. The application of modelling methods to develop and evaluate inspections is becoming an essential tool for the NDE community. Current analytical methods are inadequate for simulation of arbitrary components and heterogeneous materials, such as anisotropic welds or composite structures. Finite element analysis software (FEA), such as PZFlex, can provide the ability to simulate the inspection of these arrangements, providing the ability to economically prototype and evaluate improved NDE methods. FEA is often seen as computationally expensive for ultrasound problems however, advances in computing power have made it a more viable tool. This paper aims to illustrate the capability of appropriate FEA to produce accurate simulations of ultrasonic array inspections – minimizing the requirement for expensive test-piece fabrication. Validation is afforded via corroboration of the FE derived and experimentally generated data sets for a test-block comprising 1D and 2D defects. The modelling approach is extended to consider the more troublesome aspects of heterogeneous materials where defect dimensions can be of the same length scale as the grain structure. The model is used to facilitate the implementation of new ultrasonic array inspection methods for such materials. This is exemplified by considering the simulation of ultrasonic NDE in a weld structure in order to assess new approaches to imaging such structures.

1.
A.
Quarteroni
,
Notices of the AMS
56
,
10
19
(
2009
)
2.
O. C.
Zienkiewicz
and
R. L.
Taylor
,
The Finite Element Method
(
Butterworth-Heinemann
,
Oxford, UK
,
2000
).
3.
T. K
Helen
and
A. A.
Becker
,
Finite Element Analysis for Engineers: A Primer
(
NAFEMS
,
Hamilton, UK
,
2013
).
4.
D. V.
Hutton
and
J.
Wu
,
Fundamentals of finite element analysis
, (
McGraw-Hill
,
New York, USA
,
2004
).
5.
C.
Desilets
,
G.
Wojcik
,
L.
Nikodym
and
K.
Mesterton
, “Analyses and measurements of acoustically matched, air-coupled tonpilz transducers” in
Ultrasonics symposium 1999
, (
IEEE International
,
Nevada
,
1999
), pp.
1045
1048
.
6.
D. N
,
Alleyne
and
P.
Crawley
,
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
39
,
381
397
,
1992
.
7.
M. J. S.
Lowe
,
D. N.
Allen
and
P.
Crawley
,
Journal of Applied Mechanics
65
,
649
656
, (
1998
).
8.
G.
Wojcik
,
D.
Vaughan
,
V.
Murray
and
J.
Mould
 Jr
, “Time-domain modeling of composite arrays for underwater imaging”, in
Ultrasonics symposium 1994
, (
IEEE International
,
Cannes
,
1994
), p.
1027
32
.
9.
G.
Wojcik
,
D.
Vaughan
,
N.
Abboud
and
J.
Mould
, “Electromechanical Modeling Using Explicit Time-Domain Finite-Elements” in:
Ultrasonics symposium 1993
, (
IEEE International
,
Baltimore
,
1993
), p.
1107
12
.
10.
G.
Harvey
,
A.
Tweedie
,
C.
Carpentier
,
P.
Reynolds
, “Finite Element Analysis of Ultrasonic Phased ArrayInspections on Anisotropic Welds” in
Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation
, eds.
D. O.
Thompson
and
D. E.
Chimenti
, (
American Institute of Physics, 1335
,
Melville, NY
),
30
,
827
834
(
2010
).
11.
G.
Harvey
and
A.
Gachagan
,
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
58
,
808
819
, (
2011
).
12.
B. W.
Drinkwater
and
Wilcox
P. D
,
NDT&E International
39
,
525
541
, (
2006
).
13.
C.
Holmes
,
B. W.
Drinkwater
and
P. D.
Wilcox
,
NDT&E International
38
,
701
711
, (
2005
).
14.
J. R.
Tomlinson
,
A. R.
Wagg
and
M. J.
Whittle
,
British journal of non-destructive testing
24
,
119
124
, (
1980
).
15.
I. N.
Ermolov
, and
B. P.
Pilin
,
NDT&E International
9
,
275
280
, (
1976
).
16.
A.
Lhémery
,
P.
Calmon
,
I.
Lecœur-Tamïbi
,
R.
Raillon
and
L.
Paradis
,
NDT&E International
33
,
499
513
, (
2000
).
17.
Harfang Microtechniques Inc.
,
Characterisation Block Product Specifications
.
2006
.
18.
R.
Courant
,
K.
Friedrichs
and
H.
Lewy
.
IBM journal of Research and Development
11
,
215
234
, (
1967
).
19.
R.
O’Leary
,
G.
Brown
and
G.
Harvey
, “Droplets, vapours and clouds – a new approach to capacitive transducer manufacture”, in
Ultrasonics symposium 2013
, (
IEEE International
,
Prague
,
2013
), pp.
1105
1108
.
20.
W.
Gropp
,
E.
Lusk
,
N.
Doss
and
A.
Skjellum
,
Parallel computing
22
,
789
828
, (
1996
).
21.
C.
Carpentier
,
C.
Nageswaran
and
Y. Y.
Tse
, “Evaluation of a new approach for the inspection of austenitic dissimilar welds using ultrasonic phased array techniques”, in
Proc 10th ECNDT conference
, (
ECNDT
,
Moscow
,
2010
), pp.
442
444
.
22.
A
Juva
and
J.
Lenkkeri
, “The effect of anisotropy on the propagation of ultrasonic waves in austenitic stainless steel”, in
CSNI specialist meeting on Reliability of Ultrasonic Inspection of Austenitic Materials
, (
CSNI
,
Belgium
,
1980
), pp.
2
24
.
23.
C.
Prada
,
S.
Manneville
,
D.
Spoliansky
and
M.
Fink
,
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
99
,
2067
2076
(
1996
).
This content is only available via PDF.