Guided wave inspection technology is most often applied as a survey tool for pipeline inspection, where relatively low frequency ultrasonic waves, compared to those used in conventional ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation (NDE) methods, propagate along the structure; discontinuities cause a reflection of the sound back to the sensor for flaw detection. Although the technology can be used to accurately locate a flaw over long distances, the flaw sizing performance, especially for flaw depth estimation, is much poorer than other, local NDE approaches. Estimating flaw depth, as opposed to other parameters, is of particular interest for failure analysis of many structures. At present, most guided wave technologies estimate the size of the flaw based on the reflected signal amplitude from the flaw compared to a known geometry reflection, such as a circumferential weld in a pipeline. This process, however, requires many assumptions to be made, such as weld geometry and flaw shape. Furthermore, it is highly dependent on the amplitude of the flaw reflection, which can vary based on many factors, such as attenuation and sensor installation. To improve sizing performance, especially depth estimation, and do so in a way that is not strictly amplitude dependent, this paper describes an approach to estimate the depth of a flaw based on a multimodal analysis. This approach eliminates the need of using geometric reflections for calibration and can be used for both pipeline and plate inspection applications. To verify the approach, a test set was manufactured on plate specimens with flaws of different widths and depths ranging from 5% to 100% of total wall thickness; 90% of these flaws were sized to within 15% of their true value. A description of the initial multimodal sizing strategy and results will be discussed.

1.
H.
Kwun
and
A. E.
Crouch
, “
Guided Wave Fills Inspection Gap
,”
Pipeline and Gas Technology
7
,
28
31
(
2006
).
2.
NACE Standard SP0313-2013
,
Guided Wave Technology for Piping Applications
,
NACE International
,
2013
.
3.
ASTM Standard E2775-11
, Standard Practice for Guided Wave Testing of Above Ground Steel Pipework Using Piezoelectric Effect Transduction,
Book of Standards
3
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2011
.
4.
ASTM Standard E2929-13
, Standard Practice for Guided Wave Testing of Above Ground Steel Pipework Using Magnetostrictive Transduction,
Book of Standards
3
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2013
.
5.
A.
Birring
, “
Sizing Discontinuities by Ultrasonics
,”
Materials Evaluation
68
(
11
),
1208
1215
(
2010
).
6.
J. L.
Rose
, “Horizontal Shear,” in
Ultrasonic Waves in Solid Media
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge UK
, pp.
241
244
(
1999
).
7.
M.
Hirao
and
H.
Ogi
,
EMATs for Science and Industry – Noncontacting Ultrasonic Measurements
(
Kluwer Academic Publishers
,
Dordrecht, the Netherlands
,
2003
)
This content is only available via PDF.