The human auditory system has a remarkable ability to “hear out” a wanted sound (target) in the background of unwanted sounds. One important property of sound which helps us hear-out the target is inharmonicity. When a single harmonic component of a harmonic complex is slightly mistuned, that component is heard to separate from the rest. At high harmonic numbers, where components are unresolved, the harmonic segregation effect is thought to result from detection of modulation of the time envelope (roughness cue) resulting from the mistuning. Neurophysiological research provides evidence that such envelope modulations are represented early in the auditory system, at the level of the auditory nerve. When the mistuned harmonic is a low harmonic, where components are resolved, the harmonic segregation is attributed to more centrally-located auditory processes, leading harmonic components to form a perceptual group heard separately from the mistuned component. Here we consider an alternative explanation that attributes the harmonic segregation to detection of modulation when both high and low harmonic numbers are mistuned. Specifically, we evaluate the possibility that distortion products in the cochlea generated by the mistuned component introduce detectable beating patterns for both high and low harmonic numbers. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were measured using 3, 7, or 12-tone harmonic complexes with a fundamental frequency (F0) of 200 or 400 Hz. One of two harmonic components was mistuned at each F0: one when harmonics are expected to be resulted and the other from unresolved harmonics. Many non-harmonic DPOAEs are present whenever a harmonic component is mistuned. These non-harmonic DPOAEs are often separated by the amount of the mistuning (ΔF). This small frequency difference will generate a slow beating pattern at ΔF, because this beating is only present when a harmonic component is mistuned, it could provide a cue for behavioral detection of harmonic complex mistuning and may also be associated with the modulation of auditory nerve responses.

1.
Fishman
YI
,
Steinschneider
MS
(
2010
)
Neural correlates of auditory scene analysis based on inharmonicity in monkey primary auditory cortex
.
J Neurosci
30
:
12480
12494
2.
Hartmann
WM
,
McAdams
S
,
Smith
BK
(
1990
)
Hearing a mistuned harmonic in an otherwise periodic complex tone
.
J Acoust Soc Am
88
:
1712
1724
3.
Kleiner
M
,
Brainard
D
,
Pelli
D
(
2007
)
What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3? Perception 36 ECVP Abstract Supplement 14
4.
Lee
J
,
Green
DM
(
1994
)
Detection of a mistuned component in a harmonic complex
.
J Acoust Soc Am
96
:
716
725
5.
Lutfi
RA
,
Yost
WA
(
1981
)
Measurement of the 2f1-f2 cubic difference tone with the binaural masking level difference
.
J Acoust Soc Am
69
:
216
222
6.
Moore
BC
,
Peter
RW
,
Glasberg
BR
(
1985
)
Thresholds for the detection of inharmonicity in complex tones
.
J Acoust Soc Am
77
:
1861
1867
7.
Moore
BC
,
Glasberg
BR
,
Peter
RW
(
1986
)
Thresholds for hearing mistuned partials as a separate tones in harmonic complexes
.
J Acoust Soc Am
80
:
479
483
8.
Puria
S
(
2003
)
Measurements of human middle ear forward and reverse acoustics: implications for otoacoustic emissions
.
J Acoust Soc Am
113
:
2773
89
9.
Siegel
,
JH
(
2007
) Calibrating otoacoustic emission probes. In
Robinette
MS
,
Theodore
JG
(eds)
Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications
,
Stuttgart
:
Thieme
, pp.
403
428
10.
Sinex
DG
(
2008
)
Responses of cochlear nucleus neurons to harmonic and mistuned complex tones
.
Hear Res
238
:
39
48
11.
Sinex
DG
,
Guzik
H
,
Li
H
,
Sabes
JH
(
2003
)
Responses of auditory nerve fibers to harmonic and mistuned complex tones
.
Hear Res
182
:
130
139
12.
Sinex
DG
,
Sabes
JH
,
Li
H
(
2002
)
Responses of inferior colliculus neurons to harmonic and mistuned complex tones
.
Hear Res
168
:
150
162
This content is only available via PDF.