Heating with ICRF waves is a well-established method on present-day tokamaks and one of the heating systems foreseen for ITER. However, further work is still needed to test and optimize its performance in fusion devices with metallic high-Z plasma facing components (PFCs) in preparation of ITER and DEMO operation. This is of particular importance for the bulk ion heating capabilities of ICRF waves. Efficient bulk ion heating with the standard ITER ICRF scheme, i.e. the second harmonic heating of tritium with or without 3He minority, was demonstrated in experiments carried out in deuterium-tritium plasmas on JET and TFTR and is confirmed by ICRF modelling. This paper focuses on recent experiments with 3He minority heating for bulk ion heating on the ASDEX Upgrade (AUG) tokamak with ITER-relevant all-tungsten PFCs. An increase of 80% in the central ion temperature Ti from 3 to 5.5 keV was achieved when 3 MW of ICRF power tuned to the central 3He ion cyclotron resonance was added to 4.5 MW of deuterium NBI. The radial gradient of the Ti profile reached locally values up to about 50 keV/m and the normalized logarithmic ion temperature gradients R/LTi of about 20, which are unusually large for AUG plasmas. The large changes in the Ti profiles were accompanied by significant changes in measured plasma toroidal rotation, plasma impurity profiles and MHD activity, which indicate concomitant changes in plasma properties with the application of ICRF waves. When the 3He concentration was increased above the optimum range for bulk ion heating, a weaker peaking of the ion temperature profile was observed, in line with theoretical expectations.

1.
V.
Bergeaud
,
L.-G.
Eriksson
,
D.F.H.
Start
,
Nuclear Fusion
40
(
2000
)
35
.
2.
R.
Dumont
and
D.
Zarzoso
,
Nuclear Fusion
53
(
2013
)
013002
.
3.
R. J.
Dumont
,
Nuclear Fusion
49
(
2009
)
075033
.
4.
J.R.
Wilson
 et al.,
Physical Review Letters
75
(
1995
)
842
.
5.
C.K.
Phillips
 et al,
Physics Plasmas
2
(
1995
)
2427
.
6.
M.
Keilhacker
 et al.,
Nuclear Fusion
39
(
1999
)
209
.
7.
C.
Gormezano
 et al.,
Physical Review Letters
80
(
1998
)
5544
.
8.
F.G.
Rimini
 et al.,
Nuclear Fusion
39
(
1999
)
1591
.
9.
D.F.H.
Start
 et al.,
Physical Review Letters
80
(
1998
)
4681
.
10.
D.F.H.
Start
 et al.,
Nuclear Fusion
39
(
1999
)
321
.
11.
L.-G.
Eriksson
 et al.,
Nuclear Fusion
39
(
1999
)
337
.
12.
G.A.
Cottrell
 et al.,
Nuclear Fusion
39
(
1999
)
389
.
13.
P.
Mantica
 et al.,
Physical Review Letters
102
(
2009
)
175002
.
14.
F.
Ryter
 et al.,
Nuclear Fusion
51
(
2011
)
113016
.
15.
P.T.
Bonoli
 et al.,
Fusion Science Technology
51
(
2007
)
401
.
16.
J.-M.
Noterdaeme
 et al.,
26th EPS Conf. on Contr. Fusion and Plasma Physics
,
Maastricht
,
14 - 18 June 1999
ECA
Vol.
23J
(
1999
)
1561
1564
.
17.
J.-M.
Noterdaeme
 et al.,
Radio-Frequency Power in Plasmas
(
13th Topical Conference RF Power in Plasmas
,
1999
,
Annapolis, USA
),
AIP
,
New York
, p.
92
99
.
18.
A.
Kappatou
,
PhD
thesis
,
Eindhoven University of Technology
,
the Netherlands
(
2014
) p.
19.
T.
Kass
 et al.,
Nuclear Fusion
38
(
1998
)
807
.
20.
J.
Citrin
 et al,
Physical Review Letters
,
111
(
2013
)
155001
.
21.
J.
Garcia
 et al. 
Nuclear Fusion
55
(
2015
)
053007
.
22.
M.
Brambilla
and
R.
Bilato
,
Nuclear Fusion
49
(
2009
)
085004
.
23.
L.-G.
Eriksson
,
T.
Hellsten
and
U.
Willén
,
Nuclear Fusion
33
(
1993
)
1037
.
This content is only available via PDF.