After the production of via the reaction, there is a requirement for separating from bulk . Although a number of separation methods have been demonstrated, the possibility of using a cartridge-based system is particularly attractive for routine use in a good manufacturing practice (GMP) regulatory environment. This study confirmed that hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) solid phase extraction (SPE) with PEG as stationary phase is an efficient and easily automated method for separating molybdate and pertechnetate, and that PEG degradation in the conditions used does not affect the performance of the resin. In addition, reversed phase SPE using Waters Oasis® HLB shows promise for successful separation of molybdenum and technetium and work continues to extend this technology to readily available commercial SPE cartridges.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
19 December 2012
14TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON TARGETRY AND TARGET CHEMISTRY
26–29 August 2012
Playa del Carmen, Máxico
Research Article|
December 19 2012
Separation of molybdenum and technetium
J. D. Andersson;
J. D. Andersson
Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
K. Gagnon;
K. Gagnon
Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
J. S. Wilson;
J. S. Wilson
Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
J. Romaniuk;
J. Romaniuk
Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
D. N. Abrams;
D. N. Abrams
Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
S. A. McQuarrie
S. A. McQuarrie
Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta,
Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
AIP Conf. Proc. 1509, 233–238 (2012)
Citation
J. D. Andersson, K. Gagnon, J. S. Wilson, J. Romaniuk, D. N. Abrams, S. A. McQuarrie; Separation of molybdenum and technetium. AIP Conf. Proc. 19 December 2012; 1509 (1): 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4773975
Download citation file:
611
Views
Citing articles via
Inkjet- and flextrail-printing of silicon polymer-based inks for local passivating contacts
Zohreh Kiaee, Andreas Lösel, et al.
Design of a 100 MW solar power plant on wetland in Bangladesh
Apu Kowsar, Sumon Chandra Debnath, et al.
Effect of coupling agent type on the self-cleaning and anti-reflective behaviour of advance nanocoating for PV panels application
Taha Tareq Mohammed, Hadia Kadhim Judran, et al.
Related Content
XAFS Study of the Chemical and Structural States of Technetium in Fe(III) Oxide Co‐Precipitates
AIP Conference Proceedings (February 2007)
Stationary corrosion potential of technetium in LiCl–KCl–CsCl eutectic melt
AIP Conf. Proc. (December 2019)
Calculation of cross-sections of deuterium (D, N) reactions for the production of Technetium-99m used in the medical field
AIP Conf. Proc. (November 2024)
Phonon spectrum and electron-phonon interaction in technetium
Low Temp. Phys. (May 2005)
The Magnetic Anisotropy of Scandium, Dilute Scandium Alloys, and Technetium
AIP Conference Proceedings (March 1972)