It has been well known that in the point of view of a distant observer, all in‐falling matter to a black hole (BH) will be eventually stalled and “frozen” just outside the event horizon of the BH, although an in‐falling observer will see the matter falling straight through the event horizon. Thus in this “frozen star” scenario, as distant observers, we could never observe matter falling into a BH, neither could we see any “real” BH other than primordial ones, since all other BHs are believed to be formed by matter falling towards singularity. Here we first obtain the exact solution for a pressureless mass shell around a pre‐existing BH. The metrics inside and interior to the shell are all different from the Schwarzschild metric of the enclosed mass, meaning that the well‐known Birkhoff Theorem can only be applied to the exterior of a spherically symmetric mass. The metric interior to the shell can be transformed to the Schwarzschild metric for a slower clock which is dependent of the location and mass of the shell; we call this Generalized Birkhoff Theorem. Another result is that there does not exist a singularity nor event horizon in the shell. Therefore the “frozen star” scenario is incorrect. We also show that for all practical astrophysical settings the in‐falling time recorded by an external observer is sufficiently short that future astrophysical instruments may be able to follow the whole process of matter falling into BHs. The distant observer could not distinguish between a “real” BH and a “frozen star”, until two such objects merge together. It has been proposed that electromagnetic waves will be produced when two “frozen stars” merge together, but not true when two “real” bare BHs merge together. However gravitational waves will be produced in both cases. Thus our solution is testable by future high sensitivity astronomical observations.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.