About the Undecidable Thing of Onthologic Truth of the Reality of the Fundamental Physics Available to Purchase

In the philosophy of contemporary science, different currents from thought have been arising, each one of which, it has developed methodologies that include a set of normative rules for the evaluation that must decide the acceptance or rejection of the scientific theories already elaborated. These methodologies, rivals to each other, are: “Inductivism”, “Conventionalism”, “Falsacionism” and the “Theories like structures” (Kühn and Lakatos). These evaluative methodologies of the quality and validity of the scientific knowledge (or metatheories of science) associate a epistemological validation as soon as until limit or border of science forms, it presents/displays and it describes the observable world as well as the one that there is behind the appearances. Consequence of it has been the appearance of different valorative interpretations from the representation that the scientific theories give us of which reality is called, such as “Scientific realism”, “Antirealism”, “Conjectural realism”, “Structural realism” etc that has based their theses on the problem on language, truth and reality.