Students taking introductory physics courses not only need to learn the fundamental concepts and to solve simple problems but also need to learn to approach more complex problems and to reason like scientists. Hypothetico‐deductive reasoning is considered one of the most important types of reasoning employed by scientists. If‐then logic allows students to test hypotheses and reject those that are not supported by testing experiments. Can we teach students to reason hypothetico‐deductively and to apply this reasoning to problems outside of physics? This study investigates the development and transfer from physics to real life of hypothetico‐deductive reasoning abilities by students enrolled in an introductory physics course at a large state university. The abilities include formulating hypotheses and making predictions concerning the outcomes of testing experiments. (The work was supported by NSF grant REC 0529065.)
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
30 January 2007
2006 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE
26-27 July 2006
Syracuse, New York (USA)
Research Article|
January 30 2007
Studying Transfer Of Scientific Reasoning Abilities Available to Purchase
Eugenia Etkina;
Eugenia Etkina
Graduate School of Education, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08904
Search for other works by this author on:
Anna Karelina;
Anna Karelina
Graduate School of Education, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08904
Search for other works by this author on:
Maria Ruibal Villasenor
Maria Ruibal Villasenor
Graduate School of Education, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08904
Search for other works by this author on:
Eugenia Etkina
Graduate School of Education, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08904
Anna Karelina
Graduate School of Education, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08904
Maria Ruibal Villasenor
Graduate School of Education, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08904
AIP Conf. Proc. 883, 81–84 (2007)
Citation
Eugenia Etkina, Anna Karelina, Maria Ruibal Villasenor; Studying Transfer Of Scientific Reasoning Abilities. AIP Conf. Proc. 30 January 2007; 883 (1): 81–84. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2508696
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Effect of coupling agent type on the self-cleaning and anti-reflective behaviour of advance nanocoating for PV panels application
Taha Tareq Mohammed, Hadia Kadhim Judran, et al.
Design of a 100 MW solar power plant on wetland in Bangladesh
Apu Kowsar, Sumon Chandra Debnath, et al.
With synthetic data towards part recognition generalized beyond the training instances
Paul Koch, Marian Schlüter, et al.
Related Content
Learning of content knowledge and development of scientific reasoning ability: A cross culture comparison
Am. J. Phys. (December 2009)
Microcomputer data management in an introductory physics laboratory
Am. J. Phys. (February 1982)
Interpreting FCI scores: Normalized gain, preinstruction scores, and scientific reasoning ability
Am. J. Phys. (December 2005)
FCI normalized gain, scientific reasoning ability, thinking in physics, and gender effects
AIP Conf. Proc. (February 2012)
Using Students' Design Tasks to Develop Scientific Abilities
AIP Conf. Proc. (November 2007)