From the standpoint both of research and instruction, the variable and dynamic nature of students’ thought processes poses a significant challenge to PER. It is difficult merely to assess and characterize the diverse phases of students’ thinking as they gain and express understanding of a concept. (We might call this the “kinematics” of students’ thought processes.) Much harder still is uncovering the various factors (instructional method, student characteristics, etc.) that influence and determine the trajectory of students’ thinking. (We could call this the “dynamics” of students’ thinking.) The task of deciphering the mutual interaction of these factors adds to the challenge. I will outline some of the initial work that has been done along these lines by various researchers, and I will identify some directions for future research that I think might be fruitful for workers in PER.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
16 September 2005
2004 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE
4-5 August 2004
Sacramento, California (USA)
Research Article|
September 16 2005
How Do You Hit A Moving Target? Addressing The Dynamics Of Students’ Thinking
David E. Meltzer
David E. Meltzer
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University
Search for other works by this author on:
AIP Conf. Proc. 790, 7–10 (2005)
Citation
David E. Meltzer; How Do You Hit A Moving Target? Addressing The Dynamics Of Students’ Thinking. AIP Conf. Proc. 16 September 2005; 790 (1): 7–10. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2084688
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
Design of a 100 MW solar power plant on wetland in Bangladesh
Apu Kowsar, Sumon Chandra Debnath, et al.
Social mediated crisis communication model: A solution for social media crisis?
S. N. A. Hamid, N. Ahmad, et al.
The effect of a balanced diet on improving the quality of life in malignant neoplasms
Yu. N. Melikova, A. S. Kuryndina, et al.
Related Content
Reaching More Students Through Thinking in Physics
Phys. Teach. (February 2017)
Oersted Lecture 2013: How should we think about how our students think?
Am. J. Phys. (June 2014)
Toward Meaning and Scientific Thinking in the Traditional Freshman Laboratory: Opening the “Idea Space”
AIP Conference Proceedings (October 2010)
Improving students’ critical thinking skills in senior high school through STEM-integrated modeling instruction
AIP Conf. Proc. (April 2020)
Critical thinking of english education students program in constructing reading comprehension question
AIP Conf. Proc. (August 2023)