Much of the research investigating how a student reasons or what knowledge structures they possess and utilize has typically been done using clinical interviews. Clinical interviews are often semi‐structured and may or may not involve demonstration equipment. In the early 1980’s, mathematics researchers began using a new style of interviewing which they termed the “teaching experiment.” These two methods will be compared and contrasted within the context of sound. Two groups of students from a conceptually‐based introductory physics course were interviewed in an effort to understand how they view the production of sound in musical instruments; one group was interviewed using clinical interviews while the second group was interviewed using the teaching experiment.
Skip Nav Destination
,
,
,
Article navigation
9 September 2004
2003 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE: 2003 Physics Education Conference
6-7 August 2003
Madison, Wisconsin (USA)
Research Article|
September 09 2004
The Teaching Experiment — What it is and what it isn’t Available to Purchase
Paula V. Engelhardt;
Paula V. Engelhardt
Physics Department, Kansas State University, Manhattan KS, 66506‐2601
Search for other works by this author on:
Edgar G. Corpuz;
Edgar G. Corpuz
Physics Department, Kansas State University, Manhattan KS, 66506‐2601
Search for other works by this author on:
Darryl J. Ozimek;
Darryl J. Ozimek
Physics Department, Kansas State University, Manhattan KS, 66506‐2601
Search for other works by this author on:
N. Sanjay Rebello
N. Sanjay Rebello
Physics Department, Kansas State University, Manhattan KS, 66506‐2601
Search for other works by this author on:
Paula V. Engelhardt
Edgar G. Corpuz
Darryl J. Ozimek
N. Sanjay Rebello
Physics Department, Kansas State University, Manhattan KS, 66506‐2601
AIP Conf. Proc. 720, 157–160 (2004)
Citation
Paula V. Engelhardt, Edgar G. Corpuz, Darryl J. Ozimek, N. Sanjay Rebello; The Teaching Experiment — What it is and what it isn’t. AIP Conf. Proc. 9 September 2004; 720 (1): 157–160. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1807278
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
Citing articles via
The implementation of reflective assessment using Gibbs’ reflective cycle in assessing students’ writing skill
Lala Nurlatifah, Pupung Purnawarman, et al.
Effect of coupling agent type on the self-cleaning and anti-reflective behaviour of advance nanocoating for PV panels application
Taha Tareq Mohammed, Hadia Kadhim Judran, et al.
Classification data mining with Laplacian Smoothing on Naïve Bayes method
Ananda P. Noto, Dewi R. S. Saputro
Related Content
Development of learning tools based on learning cycle 7E assisted by mind mapping for problem solving for junior high school students
AIP Conf. Proc. (February 2023)
Answering Essay Questions
Phys. Teach. (March 2008)
Assessment Strategies to Guide Instruction
Phys. Teach. (February 2007)
2018 Millikan Medal Award Lecture: Breaking out of the physics silo
Am. J. Phys. (June 2019)