This is a descriptive and non‐mathematical summary of giant planet formation theories. There are two end‐member models, core accretion and disk instability. In the core accretion model, several to ten Earth masses of solid (ice and rock) accumulate and this promotes subsequent gas accretion. In the disk instability model, a self‐ gravitating sphere of gas forms (somewhat analogous to star formation) and a core may arise through condensation and rainout from its low density envelope. The core accretion model may have a time‐scale difficulty because the formation of the embryo and infall of gas is not fast relative to the time at which the gaseous disk is removed. The disk instability model suffers from the current theoretical inability to follow the development of these putative instabilities through to the formation of a planet. Observational data on core masses in Jupiter and Saturn do not clearly favor one model. However, the existence and nature of Uranus and Neptune strongly suggest that the formation of appropriate embryos occurs. Moreover, there is considerable flexibility in the elapsed time required to form Jupiter and Saturn by the core accretion model, including times of only a few million years, compatible with disk lifetimes. This suggests that core accretion remains the favored mode in our solar system. It is possible that both mechanisms operate in general and that many extrasolar planetary systems make use of the disk instability mode. Future theory and observations are essential for deciding this issue.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
24 June 2004
THE SEARCH FOR OTHER WORLDS: Fourteenth Astrophysics Conference
13-14 October 2003
College Park, Maryland (USA)
Research Article|
June 24 2004
Formation of Giant Planets
David J. Stevenson
David J. Stevenson
Caltech, 150‐21, Pasadena CA 91125
Search for other works by this author on:
David J. Stevenson
Caltech, 150‐21, Pasadena CA 91125
AIP Conf. Proc. 713, 133–141 (2004)
Citation
David J. Stevenson; Formation of Giant Planets. AIP Conf. Proc. 24 June 2004; 713 (1): 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1774513
Download citation file:
Pay-Per-View Access
$40.00
Sign In
You could not be signed in. Please check your credentials and make sure you have an active account and try again.
13
Views
Citing articles via
Inkjet- and flextrail-printing of silicon polymer-based inks for local passivating contacts
Zohreh Kiaee, Andreas Lösel, et al.
The implementation of reflective assessment using Gibbs’ reflective cycle in assessing students’ writing skill
Lala Nurlatifah, Pupung Purnawarman, et al.
Effect of coupling agent type on the self-cleaning and anti-reflective behaviour of advance nanocoating for PV panels application
Taha Tareq Mohammed, Hadia Kadhim Judran, et al.
Related Content
Extrasolar planets—A challenge for Astronomy
AIP Conf. Proc. (November 2008)
Planet Formation
AIP Conf. Proc. (December 2009)
What is Unknown About the Statistics of Extrasolar Planetary Systems?
AIP Conf. Proc. (June 2004)
The Fourier‐Kelvin Stellar Interferometer: A Concept for a Practical Interferometric Mission for Discovering and Investigating Extrasolar Giant Planets
AIP Conf. Proc. (June 2004)
Extrasolar Planetary Systems and the Principle of Mediocrity
AIP Conf. Proc. (March 2007)