This study investigates the level of knowledge and proficiency exhibited by pre-service mathematics teachers in analysing errors within students’ solutions to quadratic function problems. The effective teaching of quadratic functions requires educators to not only understand the subject matter themselves, but also to identify common misconceptions and errors that learners may encounter. Error analysis plays a pivotal role in fostering meaningful learning experiences. The research aims to examine pre-service mathematics teacher knowledge in response students work. This study is categorized as a qualitative research endeavour that adopts a descriptive-narrative methodology. It encompasses twenty-two pre-service mathematics teachers who are actively engaged in activities aimed at enhancing their professionalism within an Indonesian tertiary educational institution. The dataset is derived from the pre-service teachers’ reactions to a specific vignette. For data analysis, the framework employed revolves around evaluating teachers’ mathematical comprehension through error analysis. The findings demonstrate that a significant portion of the participating pre-service teachers encountered challenges in identifying, deciphering, and assessing errors inherent in comprehending the given questions. Furthermore, the pre-service teachers predominantly employ remedial strategies through reiterating fundamental concepts and furnishing guiding queries. The research might suggest the implementation of ongoing professional development opportunities for in-service teachers to enhance their error analysis skills in the context of quadratic functions

2.
H. I.
Korkmaz
and
O.
Şahin
,
J. Res. Child. Educ
34
,
385
405
(
2020
).
3.
B. Tataroğlu
Taşdan
and
M. Yiğit
Koyunkaya
,
Acta Didact. Napocensia
10
,
1
18
(
2017
).
4.
J.
Adler
and
Z.
Davis
,
J. Res. Math. Educ
37
,
270
296
(
2006
).
5.
H. C.
Hill
,
B.
Rowan
, and
D. L.
Ball
,
Am. Educ. Res. J
42
,
371
406
(
2005
).
6.
A.
Erdogan
,
J. Educ. Pract
8
,
65
74
(
2017
).
7.
F.
Aliustaoğlu
and
A.
Tuna
,
Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol
52
,
833856
(
2019
).
8.
R.
Even
and
D.
Tirosh
,
Educ. Stud. Math
29
,
1
20
(
1995
).
10.
D. M. G.
Kabar
and
R.
Amac
,
Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Derg
18
,
157
185
(
2018
).
11.
M.
Chen
, “
Research on Math Anxiety of Elementary School Teachers
,” in
Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Education, Language and Art (ICELA 2021)
,
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research
637
edited by
Z.
Tong
and
J.
Yan
(Atlantis Press SARL, Paris,
2022
), pp.
325
330
.
12.
S. Kula
Ünver
,
J. Pedagog. Res
4
,
359
374
(
2020
).
13.
Q.
Hu
,
J.
Son
, and
L.
Hodge
,
Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ
20
,
637
657
(
2022
).
14.
E.
Yurt
,
Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol
11
,
1328
1345
(
2023
).
15.
K.
Gerhard
,
D. J.
Jäger-Biela
, and
J.
König
,
Zeitschrift fur Erziehungswiss
26
,
653
676
(
2023
).
16.
V.
Díaz
,
M.
Aravena
, and
G.
Fores
,
Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ
16
,
em1896
(
2020
).
17.
P.
Vaiyavutjamai
,
N. F.
Ellerton
, and
M. A.
Clements
, “
Influences on student learning of quadratic equations
.,” in
Build. Connect. Res. theory Pract.
2
,
735
742
(
2005
).
18.
E. A.
Graf
,
J. H.
Fife
,
H.
Howell
, and
E.
Marquez
,
ETS Res. Rep. Ser
2018
,
1
28
(
2018
).
19.
N. W.
Damayanti
,
Purwanto
,
I. N.
Parta
, and
T. D.
Chandra
, “
Student Algebraic Reasoning to Solve Quadratic Equation Problem
,”
Journal of Physics: Conf. Series
,
IOP Conference Proceedings
1227
(IOP Publishing, Bristol, UK,
2019
), p.
012025
.
20.
I.
Santia
,
Purwanto
,
A.
Sutawidjadja
,
Sudirman
, and
Subanji
,
J. Math. Educ
10
,
365
378
(
2019
).
21.
C.
Matitaputty
,
T.
Nusantara
,
E.
Hidayanto
, and
Sukoriyanto
,
J. Math. Educ
13
,
393
414
(
2022
).
22.
H.
Chick
and
K.
Beswick
,
J. Math. Teach. Educ
21
,
475
499
(
2018
).
23.
W. Y.
Lo
,
Mathematics
8
,
1
13
(
2020
).
24.
C.
Bradbury-Jones
,
J.
Taylor
, and
O. R.
Herber
,
Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol
17
,
427
440
(
2014
).
25.
R.
Hughes
and
M.
Huby
,
Soc. Work Soc. Sci. Rev
11
,
36
51
(
2004
).
26.
C.
Jeffries
and
D. W.
Maeder
, “
Using Vignettes To Build and Assess Teacher Understanding of Instructional Strategies
,” in
Prof. Educ.
, Vol.
27
, No.
1
; 2,
17
28
(
2005
).
27.
M.
Poulou
,
Emot. Behav. Difficulties
6
,
50
62
(
2001
).
28.
B.
Stecher
,
V. N.
Le
,
L.
Hamilton
,
G.
Ryan
,
A.
Robyn
, and
J. R.
Lockwood
,
Educ. Eval. Policy Anal
28
,
101
130
(
2006
).
29.
M.
Simon
and
R.
Tierney
, “Use of vignettes in educational research on sensitive teaching functions as assessment.,” in
24th International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement
(
Limassol
,
Cyprus
,
2011
), pp.
1
13
.
30.
A.
Peng
and
Z.
Luo
,
For the Learning of Mathematics
29
,
22
25
(
2009
).
31.
C.
Matitaputty
,
KnE Soc. Sci
9
,
147
161
(
2024
).
32.
C.
Matitaputty
,
T.
Nusantara
,
E.
Hidayanto
, and
Sukoriyanto
, “
How mathematics teachers ’ special knowledge changing : A case study in the Professional Teacher Education program
,” in
J. Math. Educ
., Vol.
15
, No.
2
,
545
574
(
2024
).
33.
C.
Matitaputty
,
T.
Nusantara
,
E.
Hidayanto
, and
S.
Sukoriyanto
, “
Exploring mathematical knowledge for teaching of in-service teacher in teaching practice: A case of teaching permutation and combination
,” in
The 3rd International Conference On Mathematics And Its Applications (ICOMATHAPP) 2022,
AIP Conference Proceedings
3049
, edited by
Lathiful
Anwar
et al (AIP Publishing, Melville, NY,
2024
),
030016
.
34.
R.
Huang
and
G.
Kulm
,
J. Math. Behav
31
,
417
430
(
2012
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.