Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) slag is a by-product generated during low-carbon steel refining has increased throughout the year. Only a few EAF slag is being utilized for construction applications, and the remaining were stockpiled without full utilization. Iron compound is a significant component in EAF slag that has great potential to carry anti-fungal properties. EAF slag is rich in iron and can be utilized as an alternative to the anti-fungal agent for wood products. Therefore, this project aims to determine the suitability of iron compound-rich EAF (obtained from Malaysia’s steel manufacturer) slag as an anti-fungal agent that the inhibition zone of brown rot and white rot fungi were investigated. For the anti-fungal assay, potato dextrose agar (PDA) was used as media to culture the brown rot (Coniophora puteana) and white rot (Lentinus Sajor-caju) fungi. Then, the EAF slag powder was placed surrounding rot fungi to observe the inhibition zone for 30 days. The anti-fungal assay, EAF slag, was also compared to synthetic iron compounds such as pure Fe, Fe2O3, and Fe3O4. The EAF slag was also characterized using X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) to identify the phases present. The fundamental of this experiment is to find what phases exist in EAF slag that works excellent on inhibiting the growth of rot fungi. From this experiment, EAF slag shows no inhibition zone towards brown rot and white rot fungi. However, pure Fe2O3 and Fe show the most significant influence on the inhibition zone towards brown and white rot fungi growth, respectively, on day 30 of the fungal assay. It shows that the EAF slag does not significantly influence rot fungi as the inorganic agent to protect the wood from brown rot and white rot fungi attacks.

1.
M.N.
Lam
,
D.H.
Le
and
S.
Jaritngam
,
Cons. and Build. Mat.
191
,
912
933
(
2018
).
2.
I.
Sosa
,
C.
Thomas
,
J. A.
Palanco
,
J.
Setien
and
P.
Tamayo
,
App. Sci.
10
,
773
(
2020
).
3.
A.
Santamaria
,
F.
Faleschini
,
G.
Giacomello
,
K.
Brunelli
,
J.S.
Jose
,
C.
Pellegrino
and
M.
Pasetto
,
J. of Clean. Product.
205
,
599
609
(
2018
).
4.
S.O.
Omale
,
T.S.Y.
Choong
,
L.C.
Abdullah
,
S.I.
Siajam
, and
W.W.
Yi
,
Heliyon
,
5
,
1
8
(
2019
).
5.
P.T.
Teo
,
A.A.
Seman
,
C.M.
Kho
and
N.M.
Sharif
,
J. of Clean. Product.
241
,
118144
(
2019
).
6.
C.L.
Beh
,
T.G.
Chuah
,
M.N.
Nourouzi
and
T.
Choong
,
J. of Chem.
9
,
2557
2564
(
2012
).
7.
N.
Nasuha
,
B.H.
Hameed
and
P.U.
Okoye
,
J. of Env. Chem. Eng
,
9
,
104831
(
2021
).
8.
S.
Saqib
,
W.
Zaman
,
F.
Ullah
,
I.
Majeed
,
A.
Ayaz
and
M.F.H.
Munis
,
App. Organo. Chem.
33
,
5190
(
2019
).
9.
H.S.
So
,
H.S.
Jang
,
B.R.
Lee
and
S.Y.
So
,
Cons. And Build. Mat.
108
,
154
162
(
2016
).
10.
S.
Parveen
,
A.H.
Wani
,
M.A.
Shah
,
H.S.
Devi
,
M.Y.
Bhat
and
J.A.
Koka
,
Microb. Patho.
115
,
287
292
(
2018
).
11.
A.
Taufiq
,
D.
Arista
,
A.
Rachmawati
,
N.
Ramadhani
,
R.E.
Saputro
and
N.H.
Sunaryono
,
AIP Conf. Proceed.
2234
,
040026
(
2020
).
12.
E.
Saied
,
S.S.
Salem
,
A.A.
Al-Askar
,
F.M.
Elkady
,
A.A.
Arishi
and
A.H.
Hashem
,
Bioeng.
9
,
397
(
2022
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.