Digital Transformation concept is an ongoing process during which firms permanently change their methods, products, and processes to pursue advantages offered by digital technology. The public sector is expected to continue being influential and credible in the face of the ongoing upheaval. Transformation at the grassroots requires the expertise of the government officials. This study aims to discover the challenges that affect the performance of individuals during public sector digital transfonnation through the view point of practitioners. In this regard, we outline the suggested solutions to the challenges that the practitioners face. A total of six public sector officials who were at different levels were interviewed. The results showed that lack of knowledge and skills, resistance to change and adaptability, ineffective time management, low motivation and absence of digital mindset are the obstacles met. These challenges will be built into the theory of employee dynamic capability.

1.
S.
Schneider
&
O.
Kokshagina
,
Digital transformation: What we have learned (thus far) and what is next
.
Creativity and Innovation Management,
30
(
2021
)
384
411
. .
2.
F. Prezioso
,
Gianluca
;
Ceci
&
S.
Za
, Is this what you want? Looking for the appropriate digital skills set.
Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation
(
Springer Cham
,
2021
), pp.
1
7
. .
3.
T. H.
Davenport
&
J.
Kirby
,
SPRING 2016 Just How Smart Are Smart Machines?
MIT Sloan Management Review,
1
(
2016
)
7
.
4.
Y.
Qin
,
Z.
Xu
,
X.
Wang
, &
M.
Skare
,
Artificial Intelligence and Economic Development: An Evolutionary Investigation and Systematic Review
(
Springer US
,
2023
). .
5.
C.
Iordache
,
I.
Marien
, &
D.
Baelden
,
Developing digital skills and competences: A quick-scan analysis of 13 digital literacy models
.
Italian Journal of Sociology of Education,
9
(
2017
)
6
30
. .
6.
T.
Neeley
&
P.
Leonardi
,
Developing a Digital Mindset What ls a Digital Mindset?
Harvard Business review,
May-June
2
(
2022
).
7.
V.
Benke
,
The Digital Mindset A theoretical discussion
,
2013
.
8.
A.
Bienkowska
&
K.
Tworek
,
Job performance model based on Employees’ Dynamic Capabilities (EDC
).
Sustainability (Switzerland)
,
12
(
2020
). .
9.
S. L.
Dworkin
,
Sample size policy for qualitative studies using in-depth interviews
.
Archives of Sexual Behavior
,
41
(
2012
)
1319
1320
. .
10.
M.
Asim
,
Impact of Motivation on Employee Performance with Effect of Training : Specific to Education Sector
of.
3
(
2013
)
1
9
.
11.
J.
Rodriguez
&
K.
Walters
,
The Importance of Training and Development in Employee Performance and Evaluation.
(
2019
).
12.
T. T.
Sousa-Zomer
,
A.
Neely
, &
V.
Martinez
,
Digital transforming capability and performance: a microfoundational perspective
.
International Journal of Operations and Production Management
,
40
(
2020
)
1095
1128
. .
13.
G.
Verona
&
M.
Zollo
,
The Human Side of Dynamic Capabilities: A Holistic Leaming Model
.
Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management
, (
2015
)
535
550
. .
14.
R.
Murugesan
&
R.
Jayavelu
,
The Influence of Big Five Personality Traits and Self-efficacy on Entrepreneurial Intention: The Role of Gender.
2
(
2017
). .
15.
V.
Ambrosini
&
G.
Altintas
,
Dynamic Managerial Capabilities
(
2019
). .
16.
C. B.
Neck
&
C. P.
Neck
,
Seize the Day: Executive Thought Self-leadership and Heterogeneity Among Dynamic Managerial Capability Underpinning Cognitive Capabilities
.
Journal ofManagement and Strategy
,
13
(
2022
)
12
. .
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.