The growing demand for power supply worldwide has intensified the use of electrical energy, leading to increased greenhouse gas emissions and their detrimental effects on global warming. As a result, research focusing on renewable energy and carbon trading has seen a substantial surge in publications documented in Scopus. In light of this trend, this study provides a comprehensive overview of renewable energy research and carbon trading using bibliometric analysis. A total of 925 articles were carefully selected through manual screening. Findings from the bibliometric analysis reveal that China and the USA stand out as the most productive countries in renewable energy and carbon trading research. Notably, these nations also contribute significantly to CO2 emissions. The prominence of these countries suggests a proactive engagement in seeking environmental solutions and mitigating their carbon footprints. On the other hand, countries such as the USA, Russian Federation, Japan, Germany, Iran, Other Asia Pacific countries, Saudi Arabia, Canada, Brazil, Mexico, Australia, and the United Kingdom demonstrate higher CO2 emissions stemming from coal consumption, unlike China, India, South Korea, Indonesia, and South Africa. These disparities can be linked to the distinct political policies pursued by these nations. This study sheds light on the current state of renewable energy research and carbon trading, highlighting the key players and their respective contributions to greenhouse gas emissions. Such insights are vital for policymakers, stakeholders, and researchers to foster sustainable development and combat the pressing challenges posed by climate change.

1.
bp.
Statistical Review of World Energy 2022.
2022
.
2.
Sueyoshi
T
,
Goto
M.
Performance assessment of japanese electricity and gas companies during 2002–2018: Three dea approaches
.
Energies (Basel)
.
2021
Mar 2;
14
(
6
).
3.
Sarica
K
,
Or
I.
Efficiency assessment of Turkish power plants using data envelopment analysis
.
Energy.
2007
;
32
(
8
):
1484
99
.
4.
Nicholls
RJ
,
Marinova
N
,
Lowe
JA
,
Brown
S
,
Vellinga
P
,
De Gusmão
D
, et al.
Sea-level rise and its possible impacts given a “beyond 4°C world” in the twenty-first century
. In:
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. Royal Society
;
2011
. p.
161
81
.
5.
Wang
H
,
Chen
Z
,
Wu
X
,
Nie
X.
Can a carbon trading system promote the transformation of a low-carbon economy under the framework of the porter hypothesis? —Empirical analysis based on the PSM-DID method
.
Energy Policy.
2019
Jun 1;
129
:
930
8
.
6.
Ellegaard
O
,
Wallin
JA
.
The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact?
Scientometrics.
2015
Dec 1;
105
(
3
):
1809
31
.
7.
Moral-Muñoz
JA
,
Herrera-Viedma
E
,
Santisteban-Espejo
A
,
Cobo
MJ
.
Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. Vol. 29, Profesional de la Informacion
.
El Profesional de la Informacion
;
2020
.
8.
Duan
H
,
Hu
Q.
Local officials’ concerns of climate change issues in China: A case from Jiangsu
.
J Clean Prod.
2014
Feb 1;
64
:
545
51
.
9.
Gong
X
,
Zhou
SX
.
Optimal production planning with emissions trading
.
Oper Res.
2013
Jul;
61
(
4
):
908
24
.
10.
Liu
CH
,
Lin
SJ
,
Lewis
C.
Evaluation of thermal power plant operational performance in Taiwan by data envelopment analysis
.
Energy Policy.
2010
Feb;
38
(
2
):
1049
58
.
11.
Farrahi Moghaddam
R
,
Farrahi Moghaddam
F
,
Cheriet
M.
A modified GHG intensity indicator: Toward a sustainable global economy based on a carbon border tax and emissions trading
.
Energy Policy.
2013
Jun;
57
:
363
80
.
12.
Jiang
J
,
Xie
D
,
Ye
B
,
Shen
B
,
Chen
Z.
Research on China’s cap-and-trade carbon emission trading scheme: Overview and outlook
. Vol.
178
,
Applied Energy. Elsevier Ltd
;
2016
. p.
902
17
.
13.
Network for Greening the Financial System NGFS Scenarios for central banks and supervisors
.
2022
.
14.
Org W. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2023.
2023
; Available from: www.worldbank.org
15.
Shi
S
,
Yin
J.
Trends in the evolution of Sustainable Development Research in China: A Scientometric Review
.
2022
; Available from:
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.